This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Line of succession

Started by RPGPundit, August 20, 2007, 11:53:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

RPGPundit

So, in your campaigns, what's the correct line of succession, pre first series, and post first-series?

RPGPundit
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you\'ve played \'medieval fantasy\' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

Malleus Arianorum

Whoever wins won by right of inheritance. The patriarchal / matriarchal / bastard stuff is just rationalization.
That\'s pretty much how post modernism works. Keep dismissing details until there is nothing left, and then declare that it meant nothing all along. --John Morrow
 
Butt-Kicker 100%, Storyteller 100%, Power Gamer 100%, Method Actor 100%, Specialist 67%, Tactician 67%, Casual Gamer 0%

Otha

A line of succession only truly matters when there is some kind of authority to appeal to.  In medieval Europe, the Church held a great deal of power to enthrone and dethrone monarchs, especially in the smaller countries.

Despite Corwin's musings, I really don't think it applies to Amber.  Bleys tried to take the throne even though he was way down the list compared to Eric and Corwin.

Post-patternfall, Random intends to live forever.
 

SunBoy

Aye, but he'll bore of the throne pretty soon. In some ways, Random is the most "Oberon-like" of the princes. Even if he lives and reigns forever, it is bound to be some kind of conflict about him not being there, or not caring. After all, he's not the kind of chap to stay in one place for too long. That opens, IMO, a whole lot of possibilities for a post-second series campaign, were the line of succession is not so very clear.
"Real randomness, I\'ve discovered, is the result of two or more role-players interacting"

Erick Wujcik, 2007

Otha

Well in that case you're not talking about succession you're talking about usurpation.
 

Gavken

All lines of succession should start with ME. It is difficult for most characters to concede that anyone else has a worthwhile claim to the throne, although there will be a number of political characters who like Fiona stand back and let the others slug it out and eliminate themselves first.

Having said that the books make it clear that Corwin believes the order of birth is significant in the line of succession, although he is quite prepared to ignore it so that he can promote himself.

Gavin
 

Otha

Actually, I think the number of canon characters who are interested in the throne is fairly small, but maybe that's because the lesser lights know that they'd get plowed under if they tried.
 

Otha

Gavken, does he really?

Or does he use it as an excuse?  Clearly Bleys could care less about it.
 

RPGPundit

The excuses are important.  Maybe a better way of expressing the original post would be to say: how can each branch of the family justify their own succession, and simultaneously downplay the claims of any of the others?

I think there's a few things to consider here: first, there's age and seniority.
Second, is legitimacy imparted by Oberon.
And post-patternfall, there's the religious question of the Unicorn's selection of Random.

RPGPundit
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you\'ve played \'medieval fantasy\' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

Otha

That's a much better question.  How does each person view the succession?

In my current game, Eithne views herself as queen, when Tir-na Nog'th has never really needed one and never had any kind of enduring authority.

I'm waiting, right now, for the other PC's to either acknowledge her authority or challenge it.  That's dramatic.
 

Croaker

Quote from: RPGPunditThe excuses are important.  Maybe a better way of expressing the original post would be to say: how can each branch of the family justify their own succession, and simultaneously downplay the claims of any of the others?
Yup, I always tried to do things like this in my various Throne wars: The first born would be an illegitimate bastard who was never recognized, another would have been born later, illegimitate also, but were recognized, yet another was the firstborn to oberon's first official wife, but was destituted...
So each player could conceivably claim to have a right to the throne greater than the others.
 

gabriel_ss4u

I notice that sometimes, when RPGPundit starts a tread it seems SOME replies are nothing more than an attempt to pick apart the logic of his questions rather than give a true reply to advance the thread.
WTF???

I thought it a good question.

My answer is I go along with Corwin's explanation given to Ganelon in SotU.

However, here is an excerpt from RZ in the forward to the book Black Road War
(this is merely additional info for whoever wants - it IS a tough book to track down for a fair price.)

RZ SAYS;
*
Mother............................. Offspring
Moins............................... Llewella
Rilga.................................Caine , Julian, Gerard

(Aged more rapidly than many; retired to a Shrine of the Unicorn and spent her final yrs. as something of a recluse.)
Paulette...........................Random, Mirelle
(High-strung; a suicide; possibly from our shadow Earth)
Dybele.............................Flora
(Died in childbirth)
Lora...............................Sand, Delwin
(Oberon married her in another shadow while Rilga was still living @ her shrine; different time stream, though; tricky to date)
Kinta.............................Coral
Deela the Desacratrix.......Dalt

(Died leading her troops into battle)
Harla............................None known
(Didn't work out, and they separated by mutual consent; no record of divorce or annulment; no record of marriage either; peculiar, as Oberon did for a time refer to her as his wife.)

Questions of sequence do arise with respect to various Shadow-Paradoxes, to which Merlin refers later in the series when thinking upon the ease with which interpretations of birth precedence could be challenged. This has mainly to do with the fact that some of the Amberites were born in Shadows possessed of radically different time streams.*

*Written by Roger Zelazny and Taken from "the Black Road War"  by Neil Randall
Gabriel_ss4u
From the Halls of Amber to the Courts of Chaos - and beyond.
Champions since 1982
ADRPG since 1992
Supers & Sci-Fant since fa-eva.
http://gabriel-ss4u.deviantart.com/
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1198352862

Uncle Twitchy

Doesn't he say in the Merlin Chronicles that Harla was Delwin and Sand's mother?
 

gabriel_ss4u

Remind me, WHO says?

Shadow Knight says Harla is Sand's mummy.
I'd have to scour my novels for further info.

What I wrote was excerpted from a novel 'which way' adventure, and the written forward was by Roger Zelazny, and that is what he wrote. (I believe it was written at the time the 2nd or 3rd Merlin book was out.)
copyright 1988
Gabriel_ss4u
From the Halls of Amber to the Courts of Chaos - and beyond.
Champions since 1982
ADRPG since 1992
Supers & Sci-Fant since fa-eva.
http://gabriel-ss4u.deviantart.com/
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1198352862

Uncle Twitchy

Quote from: gabriel_ss4uRemind me, WHO says?

The guy that wrote the Merlin Chronicles, smartass. :p

QuoteWhat I wrote was excerpted from a novel 'which way' adventure, and the written forward was by Roger Zelazny, and that is what he wrote. (I believe it was written at the time the 2nd or 3rd Merlin book was out.)
copyright 1988

I'm aware. And I'm rereading the Merlin Chronicles now and in Blood of Amber (page 115 of the first edition Avon paperback if you want to be pedantic) Zelazny specifically states that Harla is Delwin and Sand's mother.