TheRPGSite

Fan Forums => The Official Amber DRPG, Erick Wujcik, and Lords of Olympus Forum => Topic started by: James McMurray on January 07, 2008, 02:35:18 PM

Title: Inquiry posted at rpg.net
Post by: James McMurray on January 07, 2008, 02:35:18 PM
The question is "Why does anyone praise this as a system?"

Found here (http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?t=372666).
Title: Inquiry posted at rpg.net
Post by: RPGPundit on January 07, 2008, 03:33:15 PM
Most of the people involved in that thread are idiots. Amber is a great system the same way that Diplomacy is a great system. Its one of the few truly workable truly brilliant rules-lite mechanics, and it encourages creative description in a way so many other systems tried and failed at doing, and encourages roleplaying likewise.

RPGPundit
Title: Inquiry posted at rpg.net
Post by: brettmb2 on January 07, 2008, 03:54:33 PM
The nice thing about it is that the simplicity doesn't paint you into a corner like most of the "story games" do. In other words, you have a lot of freedom, which promotes storytelling instead of forcing you to tell a story.
Title: Inquiry posted at rpg.net
Post by: James McMurray on January 07, 2008, 09:42:26 PM
Tell them, not me. :)
Title: Inquiry posted at rpg.net
Post by: Malleus Arianorum on January 08, 2008, 06:51:50 AM
:stirthepot:
Title: Inquiry posted at rpg.net
Post by: Jason D on January 08, 2008, 03:25:47 PM
Quote from: RPGPunditMost of the people involved in that thread are idiots.
I think you've got it reversed.

Most of the 50+ posts on that thread are in support of Amber's system, with one or two critics (including one complete fool I've long ago placed on my ignore list).
Title: Inquiry posted at rpg.net
Post by: Croaker on January 08, 2008, 03:38:18 PM
I figured as much, thus my incomprehension of pundit's comment.
Title: Inquiry posted at rpg.net
Post by: James McMurray on January 08, 2008, 04:07:47 PM
I have a theory that Pundit reads a post far enough to determine whether the poster agrees with him or not. If they don't, he reads the whole thing to stoke his hate furnaces. Once he's read at least a part of them all, he decides how many people are for and against him based on the number of words he's read, not the number of posts.

Or he might just have a blind spot for usernames that aren't on his Watch List, and so think that one very vocal anti-Amber poster is really 15 people making seperate, but strangely related, posts.
Title: Inquiry posted at rpg.net
Post by: RPGPundit on January 09, 2008, 09:45:56 AM
Quote from: jdurallI think you've got it reversed.

Most of the 50+ posts on that thread are in support of Amber's system, with one or two critics (including one complete fool I've long ago placed on my ignore list).

Well maybe, but the most vocal ones, the ones who are actually INVOLVED and directing the thread, are idiots.

Note that some of the defenders of Amber on that thread are idiots too, because they're engaging in poor apologetics, failing to do a good job to explain WHY the other guys are idiots.

RPGPundit
Title: Inquiry posted at rpg.net
Post by: Seanchai on January 09, 2008, 12:55:37 PM
Quote from: RPGPunditNote that some of the defenders of Amber on that thread are idiots too, because they're engaging in poor apologetics, failing to do a good job to explain WHY the other guys are idiots.

Can't we just tar them with the Swine brush and be done with it?

Seanchai
Title: Inquiry posted at rpg.net
Post by: Trevelyan on January 10, 2008, 01:45:36 PM
I've added my tuppence to the debate.
Title: Inquiry posted at rpg.net
Post by: gabriel_ss4u on January 17, 2008, 01:40:45 PM
Quote from: James McMurrayTell them, not me. :)


Ummm...
Just who was asking that 1st question?

Oh, thought so... send them a link too...
I agree with the 1st 2 replies.
Title: Inquiry posted at rpg.net
Post by: Trevelyan on January 18, 2008, 09:27:12 AM
Quote from: TrevelyanI've added my tuppence to the debate.
I should probably add that I'm know as Mozart in those parts.