This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Attribute ranks are a flawed concept?

Started by scottishstorm, October 05, 2009, 07:57:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3
User actions

gabriel_ss4u

#30
October 21, 2009, 09:52:43 PM
no self update... I'm just OCD about doing it myself and keeping track.
I should say, after reviewing my post, I never mentioned that the ".5"s of the matching ranks are in order of stuff, good to bad.
All generations IMC are compared across the board with # value.

A PC with a pt. value of 75 in Psyche and an elder with the same pt. value in the same attribute will be determined by stuff, and if still even... it goes to the elder. (this is without any other determining factors)

I can e-mail you the excel speadsheet if you like boulet, then you can cut/paste & rework as you like.

:) :) :)
Gabriel_ss4u
From the Halls of Amber to the Courts of Chaos - and beyond.
Champions since 1982
ADRPG since 1992
Supers & Sci-Fant since fa-eva.
http://gabriel-ss4u.deviantart.com/
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1198352862
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3
User actions