This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

[MERGED] danskmacabre's Review Links

Started by danskmacabre, April 28, 2016, 11:25:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

danskmacabre


danskmacabre

For those who are interested, I have done a Stars without Number review here:
https://rpgworkshop.wordpress.com/2016/01/20/a-stars-without-number-review/

danskmacabre

Why merge 2 separate threads for 2 separate RPGs?

brettmb

Because no actual reviews are present, just links.

danskmacabre

Quote from: brettmb;894985Because no actual reviews are present, just links.

Links to reviews. If that's a problem, just tell me and I can change it. I'm not trying to con anyone, it's just wordpress has better formatting etc.

brettmb

If you want to repost them with the actual review, that would be great and I'll delete this thread.

danskmacabre

Quote from: brettmb;895029I you want to repost them with the actual review, that would be great and I'll delete this thread.

I did post them with the actual review.. A link to the actual review.   Why is that a problem?
I guess I'm missing something here...  What difference does it make whether the review is posted directly in this thread or a link is posted?

brettmb

A link is not a review. A link is a link to another web site that has the review. The thread has to have the actual review to qualify as a review.

danskmacabre

Quote from: brettmb;895160A link is not a review. A link is a link to another web site that has the review. The thread has to have the actual review to qualify as a review.

Why? What's the problem?
Why does the actual text of the review have to actually be in the thread? Why isn't a link just as good?

brettmb

Because that's the way it is.

Not sure what happened to the cooperative " If that's a problem, just tell me and I can change it," but now you're just trying to be disruptive.