SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

A Humble Proposal...

Started by Mr. Analytical, November 29, 2006, 08:17:36 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mr. Analytical

I've noticed a trend in recent times that I think is most unfortunate.

It started with the Borg Wars and has now moved over to the issue of open rolling.

It seems that what happens is that Pundit will post an observation, people will then discuss it but when people see the discussion going off in a different direction, rather than try to drag it round to what they want to talk about, they just start a new thread.

During the Borg Wars the Pundit did this at least three times and now I'm seeing other people doing it too.

So please... if people aren't interested in your take on a debate, don't start up a new thread in order to garner people's attention.  It makes it very difficult to follow a discussion.

Sosthenes

Erm, hmm? That's the correct way to go. If you don't want to derail the thread, start a new discussion. If nobody wants to read that, at least they're not subjected to weird tangents in the original thread.
 

TonyLB

It's nice if you can remember to post a link to the new thread in the prior one (and a back-link to the prior thread in the new one) though.  That makes it a bit easier for people to track how things evolve if they're not right there in the moment.
Superheroes with heart:  Capes!

Mr. Analytical

It's one thing to start up a new thread when the existing thread veers off course , but it's quite another to start a new thread because you want to re-state what you've said before or just draw attention to your take on the question.

Spike

Y'know, this bears repeating...


I think I'll go make a new thread!


Just joking. I'm with you on this, man. I'd rather have one massive thread than five slightly less massive thread. If I care I only need to slog through one, if I don't I only need to ignore...One.
For you the day you found a minor error in a Post by Spike and forced him to admit it, it was the greatest day of your internet life.  For me it was... Tuesday.

For the curious: Apparently, in person, I sound exactly like the Youtube Character The Nostalgia Critic.   I have no words.

[URL=https:

RPGPundit

I think there are two cases where making new threads are warranted:

1. When your original thread has been derailed for whatever reason, and you want to restate your point in order to try to generate discussion about your original intended subject, and not whatever the people who hijacked your thread wanted it to be about.

2. when you think of something related but different from the subject of the thread, and in order NOT to hijack the thread, you choose to allow that discussion to continue and post your own thread in order to talk about your new concept.

I think both of these are acceptable, and recommended rather than derailing a current thread.

Hey, we're not the big purple here, as long as they actually HAVE a subject, we can't really have enough new threads. The more the merrier.

RPGPundit
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you\'ve played \'medieval fantasy\' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

Spike

Not that I want moderators running around closing threads, here, but I think you've got it a bit wrong. I've seen a number of good and interesting threads just disappear, completely smothered by five threads about the Borg, then three or four threads about noblis, then...

Very rapidly, this site seems less about gaming and more a place for fans and haters to fight a war, while people like me duck the bullets and occasionally fire of a volley to vent our frustration. Lots of threads is good, sure, but right now it feels a little one note-ish. There's got to be a middle ground.


Also: Attempting to 'rerail' your own thread? Lame. You said you peice, people commented on it. Its there for everyone to read, if they haven't already.  Want to put your thread back on track? Do it in your original thread.  To be honest, I can't really tell you the difference between the three Borg is a moron threads you did. Nor do I care.
For you the day you found a minor error in a Post by Spike and forced him to admit it, it was the greatest day of your internet life.  For me it was... Tuesday.

For the curious: Apparently, in person, I sound exactly like the Youtube Character The Nostalgia Critic.   I have no words.

[URL=https:

Sosthenes

I kinda miss the threaded discussions Usenet provided. Sadly the apparent ease of forums has killed the superior solution.

(Yes, I'm aware that I can switch to a threaded view here, but that wouldn't change much)
 

David R

Quote from: Mr. AnalyticalIt's one thing to start up a new thread when the existing thread veers off course , but it's quite another to start a new thread because you want to re-state what you've said before or just draw attention to your take on the question.

Okay, enough already, it was me... me I tell you. I just... wanted.. (sobbing)..wanted to discuss the whole story gaming angle about the GM's perogative...It wont happen again :D

Regards,
David R

mythusmage

Over at Circus Maximus there is an option to "fork" a thread. A button you can use to create a new thread off an old one. Since this site uses vBulletin as well, I'm wondering if that option could be enabled here.
Any one who thinks he knows America has never been to America.