TheRPGSite

Here's the EnWorld thread (http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?659197-Dice-Action-Camera-players-in-sex-scandal!)

Sum: ProJared, a well-known Youtuber, D&D celeb, and self-described "male Feminist", has been busted by his wife for an extramarital affair with a fellow "Dice, Camera, Action!" player. Plus, our buddy was also exposed for sending out pics of his junk to other gamers!

Have these people no decency?!?! The horror .... the ... horror ...

LOL! 2019 is looking like the Year of Social Annihilation. The SJWs are falling like dominoes!

His wife is pretty hot.  I’d hit dat.

I watched a few episodes of  "Dice, Camera, Action!".  Mainly for the smoking hot redhead former beauty queen who was playing a Paladin.   Don't tell me this ProJared guy was banging her?

Quote from: Crusader X;1087185I watched a few episodes of  "Dice, Camera, Action!".  Mainly for the smoking hot redhead former beauty queen who was playing a Paladin.   Don't tell me this ProJared guy was banging her?

Apparently he was banging a chick named Holly Conrad.  Google her.  Not that hot but I'd still hit dat.

Quote from: myleftnut;1087186Apparently he was banging a chick named Holly Conrad.  Google her.  Not that hot but I'd still hit dat.

Ah, ok.  I vaguely remember Holly.  Anna Prosser was the hot redhead.

I didn't know enough about any of the cast to tell if they were SJWs or not.  Was the show still airing?

Quote from: Crusader X;1087189Ah, ok.  I vaguely remember Holly.  Anna Prosser was the hot redhead.

I didn't know enough about any of the cast to tell if they were SJWs or not.  Was the show still airing?

To be honest I have no clue who these people are.

(https://pics.me.me/days-since-last-male-feminist-accused-of-sexual-misconduct-0-28554192.png)

Apparently he sent his dick pics to someone underage?  Or maybe I misheard.  I hope that's not the case.

Quote from: Ratman_tf;1087192(https://pics.me.me/days-since-last-male-feminist-accused-of-sexual-misconduct-0-28554192.png)

EVERY.  FUCKING.  TIME.  Every time.  EVERY TIME.

Quote from: thedungeondelver;1087194Apparently he sent his dick pics to someone underage?  Or maybe I misheard.  I hope that's not the case.

If true that's criminal. I'm inclined to believe his scorned soon to be exwife made it up. I've had some psycho girlfriends who became psycho ex's.  If I was some internet star I'd get metoo'd faster than I can say I'm woke.

Quote from: myleftnut;1087197If true that's criminal. I'm inclined to believe his scorned soon to be exwife made it up. I've had some psycho girlfriends who became psycho ex's.  If I was some internet star I'd get metoo'd faster than I can say I'm woke.

Greetings!

No doubt. Of course, no one ever wants to believe that women can be lying, decietful, and manipulative for the purposes of their own gain or their pleasure in getting revenge. No, never. Furthermore, it always boggles me that so many people are eager to believe that women are these sweet, innocent, pure creatures.

Few seem to want to face the harsh truth of women--many, many of them are absolute hedonists that love wallowing in debauchery at every opportunity.

Women love sending nude pics to men--they do it all the time to men that they find attractive. Women love stealing men from other women. The challenge, the ego-stroking, the competitiveness against other women, the hot, illicit sex--all of that is like a MOAB of coke to their brains. They fucking love it. Women love orgies, affairs, playing grab-ass with a stable of fuck boys online, all of it.

I'm sure this SJW is a moron, and it wouldn't surprise me if he is guilty of whatever. All along the way, though, there were probably hordes of women banging him eagerly behind his wife's back. Fucking desperately hungry they were. This shit happens all the time.

Sad.

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

Quote from: myleftnut;1087186Apparently he was banging a chick named Holly Conrad.  Google her.  Not that hot but I'd still hit dat.

Looks a bit too much "danger haired" for my tastes.

ProJared cheated on his hot wife to chase the skirt of an ugly feminist hipster who looks eerily similar to the children's book character and SJW hero Harry Potter.

Yep, sounds like a typical "male feminist" SJW

I'll admit, I liked some of ProJared's non-political videos but I always knew he was an idiot.

But this is dumb even by his standards.

Seriously, I think ProJared just went full retard on this one.

Quote from: Shasarak;1087199Looks a bit too much "danger haired" for my tastes.

Greetings!

LOL!:D You know, I often look at lots of these women, 20ish to early 30's, and even if some of them are otherwise physically attractive, to some extent, I'm always left with an overwhelming feeling of repulsion, and just saying to myself, "Oh, fuck no."

I don't know their names, I've never met them--or seeing them in public, work, etc, I just notice them briefly and move on. So many of them seem just like a fucking trainwreck.

Maybe I'm just getting old.:D

Even if I was 25 or 30, though, I would reject 90% of them, you know? Isn't that wierd of me?

I remember when I was 18 to 25, etc, damn. Thousands of hot women everywhere. Have women been getting ugly or what? Is there something wrong with me?

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

Quote from: myleftnut;1087197If true that's criminal. I'm inclined to believe his scorned soon to be exwife made it up. I've had some psycho girlfriends who became psycho ex's.  If I was some internet star I'd get metoo'd faster than I can say I'm woke.

His soon to be ex-wife had nothing to do with those allegations, though.  Jared ran a semi-secret blog where he would post nudes his fans sent him, and he was also apparently into sending his fans nude pictures of himself.  Although the blog was for people 18 and above, there was no method of age verification, and at least one of the fans he solicited nudes from and sent nudes to was underage.  That person contacted the production company Jared works with last month with the allegations, and they launched a private investigation.

Jared announced his divorce on Twitter, apparently without contacting his wife, who he'd actually blocked on Twitter.  In the aftermath of that drama, people who'd been involved with Jared's blog or who he'd sent pictures to started weighing in on Twitter.  The person who had contacted NormalBoots made the allegations public, which forced the production company's hand.  They announced the existence of the investigation and hastily got rid of Jared.

I have no idea if his (soon to be ex-)wife is psycho or not, but from what I've seen, all she's guilty of is having her husband be lie to her, cheat on her, and announce his divorce from her in a public and humiliating fashion.

Quote from: SHARK;1087201Greetings!

LOL!:D You know, I often look at lots of these women, 20ish to early 30's, and even if some of them are otherwise physically attractive, to some extent, I'm always left with an overwhelming feeling of repulsion, and just saying to myself, "Oh, fuck no."

I don't know their names, I've never met them--or seeing them in public, work, etc, I just notice them briefly and move on. So many of them seem just like a fucking trainwreck.

Maybe I'm just getting old.:D

Even if I was 25 or 30, though, I would reject 90% of them, you know? Isn't that wierd of me?

I remember when I was 18 to 25, etc, damn. Thousands of hot women everywhere. Have women been getting ugly or what? Is there something wrong with me?

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

Agreed.

As someone in the 25-30 age group, if I see a dangerhair, I stay the fuck away.

Never stick your dick in a leftist hipster. Or make eye contact with them for that matter...

The only good things that dangerhairs have ever done for me is that they reaffirm my bisexuality and let me know what kind of women to avoid in my life.

Quote from: The Scythian;1087202His soon to be ex-wife had nothing to do with those allegations, though.  Jared ran a semi-secret blog where he would post nudes his fans sent him, and he was also apparently into sending his fans nude pictures of himself.  Although the blog was for people 18 and above, there was no method of age verification, and at least one of the fans he solicited nudes from and sent nudes to was underage.  That person contacted the production company Jared works with last month with the allegations, and they launched a private investigation.

Jared announced his divorce on Twitter, apparently without contacting his wife, who he'd actually blocked on Twitter.  In the aftermath of that drama, people who'd been involved with Jared's blog or who he'd sent pictures to started weighing in on Twitter.  The person who had contacted NormalBoots made the allegations public, which forced the production company's hand.  They announced the existence of the investigation and hastily got rid of Jared.

I have no idea if his (soon to be ex-)wife is psycho or not, but from what I've seen, all she's guilty of is having her husband be lie to her, cheat on her, and announce his divorce from her in a public and humiliating fashion.

Greetings!

Good to know, Scythian. This Jared guy sounds like a real winner. His poor wife getting jacked like that, just so her husband Jared can bang some worthless skank. Very sad.

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

Is it just me or does Projared look like BA Felton from Knights of the Dinner Table.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]3381[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]3383[/ATTACH]

Evidence is good in these situations but did those accusations come out before this cheating situation?  I believe I've seen people jump on the accusations bandwagon. Don't get me wrong I'm not defending the guy. Someone who cheats on his wife is not a man.

Is it just me or does Projared look like BA Felton from Knights of the Dinner Table

[ATTACH=CONFIG]3384[/ATTACH]  [ATTACH=CONFIG]3385[/ATTACH]

Maybe it is just the eyes.

Quote from: Shasarak;1087209Is it just me or does Projared look like BA Felton from Knights of the Dinner Table

[ATTACH=CONFIG]3384[/ATTACH]  [ATTACH=CONFIG]3385[/ATTACH]

Maybe it is just the eyes.

Uncanny resemblance!

Quote from: Crusader X;1087189Ah, ok.  I vaguely remember Holly.  Anna Prosser was the hot redhead.

Googling indicates she was Miss Oregon 2011!

(https://pics.wikifeet.com/Anna-Prosser-Feet-2644341.jpg)

What does this even have to do with RPGs beyond a tangential involvement?

Who is this ProJared dude? How is he a "D&D Celeb"?

Quote from: Theory of Games;1087180LOL! 2019 is looking like the Year of Social Annihilation. The SJWs are falling like dominoes!

LET THE BODIES HIT THE FLOOR!!!

Quote from: SHARK;1087201Have women been getting ugly or what? Is there something wrong with me?

There's lots wrong with you! :eek:

But you're right about women getting fugly.

Tramp stamps were dumb enough, but neck tats & tit tats is just suicidal desecration of any beauty that had been there, plus they scream that her brain is lost to bad places.

I'm sure "tat shaming" is on the Thought Crime list, but me and my dick don't give a shit.

Quote from: Melan;1087235What does this even have to do with RPGs beyond a tangential involvement?

A gamer got nookie! Huzzah?

QuoteWhat does this even have to do with RPGs beyond a tangential involvement?

QuoteWho is this ProJared dude? How is he a "D&D Celeb"?

Critical Role gets talked about fairly often on here.  ProJared is/was on a similar D&D livestream show titled "Dice, Camera, Action!", which is officially run by WotC and DMed by WotC's Chris Perkins.  The show has been airing for at least a few years now.  But probably not anymore.

[video=youtube;a1ZbgywIF6Y]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1ZbgywIF6Y&t=12s[/youtube]

I had to look up what "dangerhair" was on the Urban Dictionary. I read the definition to my wife and we both laughed so hard we had tears in our eyes. Pure gold.

Edit: The part that got us was the use in a sentence.
   

Quote"Stay away from Zoey. She's a danger hair— cute but crazy. Like a poison dart frog."

Do you guys remember how Gamer Gate got started? It was because a female game reviewer was cheating on her boyfriend. What's interesting is that this YouTuber is in all of this trouble for cheating on his wife but if the roles were reversed, he'd be attacked for slut shaming. Just interesting.

Quote from: Melan;1087235What does this even have to do with RPGs beyond a tangential involvement?

At first blush, not much.

However, as publishers have embraced liveplay streams, Twitch, Youtube and twitter as the primary means of marketing their games, they've become vulnerable to this type of social media scandal. The people involved in these productions tend to be narcissistic drama queens, and their scandals get massively amplified on social media. If WotC shuts down Dice, Camera, Action because of this, it loses a major plank in its marketing strategy.  

I guess companies don't really get to pick their market. But it's becoming evident there's a cost to WotC's reliance on the young, nerdy, woke, extremely online crowd and the flakes who pass as celebrities to that crowd.

Quote from: Haffrung;1087266At first blush, not much.

However, as publishers have embraced liveplay streams, Twitch, Youtube and twitter as the primary means of marketing their games, they've become vulnerable to this type of social media scandal. The people involved in these productions tend to be narcissistic drama queens, and their scandals get massively amplified on social media. If WotC shuts down Dice, Camera, Action because of this, it loses a major plank in its marketing strategy.  

I guess companies don't really get to pick their market. But it's becoming evident there's a cost to WotC's reliance on the young, nerdy, woke, extremely online crowd and the flakes who pass as celebrities to that crowd.

Get woke...go broke.

Quote from: Melan;1087235What does this even have to do with RPGs beyond a tangential involvement?

Cooch, for the win!!!

Quote from: Haffrung;1087266I guess companies don't really get to pick their market.

   I keep coming back to Tolkien and the hippies and neopagans in this regard.

I feel like this should be in other games.  ProJared is more known for his connection with Game Grumps and Nintendo game reviews.

Has anyone seen this "Dice, Camera, Action"?

How does it compare to Critical Role or other YouTubed D&D?

Quote from: Haffrung;1087266However, as publishers have embraced liveplay streams, Twitch, Youtube and twitter as the primary means of marketing their games, they've become vulnerable to this type of social media scandal.

THIS is an extremely good point.

Companies have handed off marketing to fans and amateurs, cuz its cheap and effective when everything goes smoothly.

But when things go off the rails? The company now has lost control of its marketing.

Quote from: Haffrung;1087266The people involved in these productions tend to be narcissistic drama queens, and their scandals get massively amplified on social media.

In LA, we call this breed of demihumans "actors".

YouTube has only cut out the middleman filters and now many more of the demihumans can be seen preening on screens, instead of just preening while waiting tables.

But big Hollywood productions have been sideswiped by the antics and scandals of professional actors since the movies began. Of course, the scandal media was slower (and easier for studios to control) than today's 24/7 social media outrage fest where most everyone online has been Pavlovian trained to twitch at every new scandal.

QuoteFew seem to want to face the harsh truth of women--many, many of them are absolute hedonists that love wallowing in debauchery at every opportunity.





Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

Not nearly enough of them and thank TLoPh for those that are.
(tloph is the true higher power: The Laws of Physics)

Much as how the idiocy of the Christian Right and the Atheist Left help reaffirm my practice of Hellenic Paganism by letting me know that I made the right decision to abandon authoritarian death cults, the screeching dangerhair sows of the Millennial Left reaffirm my bisexuality.

When my generation has so many of their women be so downright repulsive and despicable, it makes me glad that I can find companionship among my fellow men and those women who are not shrieking punk harpies and blue-haired communist sows.

My girlfriend may not be a super-hot bombshell in terms of physical beauty, but she is a calm and reasonable woman who has a good personality and a lot of the same interests as me.

I aimed within my league and I was able to find a woman who so far seems to be a good match for me, and I consider myself lucky in doing so.

Anyone who saw my old YouTube videos knows I am not a looker in any way and am ugly as sin.

But I have been taking a lot better care of myself lately and I found a girl in my area who I had common interests with and already kind of knew beforehand and we actually started out as just friends before it eventually progressed into a relationship.

You just gotta go with the flow, keep your cool, take good care of yourself, and let things happen at their own pace organically and you just might find the right someone to be with and even if you don't, it's really not that big of a deal.

I actually was fine with being single before but I am also enjoying having a girlfriend now and if more men my age listened to advice like this and less women my age were repulsive dangerhairs, there would not be an incel movement.

Yeah, there were always guys who could never get any since the dawn of time, but the Millennials were the first generation to turn it into a political movement instead of something to keep to one's self.

Oddly enough, the majority of incels aren't the repulsive brony neckbeards that the Left makes them out to be. I've had some morbid curiosity about this movement which is frankly ridiculous but is made out to be this grandiose boogeyman by the SJW Left.

They're mostly mildly awkward young guys who have been misinformed by mainstream media and radical feminism and they grow up thinking that TV sitcoms and John Hughes teen flicks are real life and they have a lot of misplaced anger as a result.

Combine that misplaced anger and misinformation with the sense of entitlement that so many Millennials have regardless of political affiliation and you get the idiocy of the incel movement.

Honestly, if they could just keep their head down and aim within their league instead of acting like spoiled idiots, a good number of the incels could actually get laid.

You aren't entitled to a smoking hot 10/10 popular girl.

If you want to have sex with the prom queen, you gotta have enough game to win her over. But if you keep your head down, take care of yourself and try to aim within your league, you can find the right person.

You may not have enough game to get the hottest girl in town, but if you go in with the right attitude and take care of yourself, you could definitely get a date with the quiet chubby girl sitting alone in the corner writing Sailor Moon fanfiction and even if she's not conventionally attractive, it's still better than being constantly lonely, bitter, and angry over bullshit that stops being important once high school ends.

And who knows? You might just be happier with the quiet mousy chick or the chubby weeb than you would be with the popular blonde bombshell, whether if she is your girlfriend or just a friend.

Physical beauty is only skin deep, and a woman with a good personality, common interests, and emotional compatibility is always a better choice for a partner, regardless of appearances.

Both dangerhairs and incels are prime examples of the failure of the Millennial generation and are both products of misinformation from a mix of the mainstream media, the mistaken belief that pop culture is reality, our broken education system of underfunded public schools and colleges that are little more than overpriced diploma mills that double as indoctrination camps, and the fact that our out-of-touch Boomer grandparents spoiled us rotten while our apathetic Generation X Goth parents didn't bother to raise us right.

Now, I mentioned that stuff to bring me to the topic of ProJared.

ProJared was a nerdy YouTuber and gamer geek who had actually made it in a way.

He was a minor celebrity with a monetized and fairly popular YouTube channel and was married to a literal beauty queen (despite him looking like the deformed bastard child of Jerry Seinfeld and Toucan Sam) and yet he threw it all away so he could score with an ugly dangerhair sow.

ProJared was like the reverse incel stereotype. He was an ugly pathetic dork who had no social skills and despite that, he had money, publicity, and a beautiful wife who seemed to treat him well.

But sadly ProJared self-imploded due to a mix of unwarranted entitlement, stupidity, an insistence on a more ideologically pure partner, and of course, generally being unable to keep it in his pants.

Quote from: Spinachcat;1087298Has anyone seen this "Dice, Camera, Action"?

How does it compare to Critical Role or other YouTubed D&D?

I've watched a few episodes.  Chris Perkins is a good DM.  The girls (Anna and Holly) are good and engaging roleplayers.  Particularly Anna.  The guys (ProJared and the other guy) are dull and are easily outshined by the girls.  Normally I wouldn't judge a person's roleplaying abilities, but these shows are broadcast as entertainment, so...

I may have watched one episode of Critical Role, so its hard for me to compare the two.  Neither show held my interest for long.  The best D&D streaming show IMO was Matt Mercer running Tomb of Annihilation for a group of non-Critical Role actors, including Joe Manganiello and Deborah Ann Woll.  Matt, Joe, and Deborah Ann are much more charismatic than the average roleplayer, so they were fun to watch.

Hahahaha. People here love their prurient gossip, it seems. I haven't seen the show and have no opinion on the melodrama. As for those expressing distaste for "dangerhairs", I'm sure those women are very thankful for your lack of interest in them.

Quote from: SavageSchemer;1087252I had to look up what "dangerhair" was on the Urban Dictionary. I read the definition to my wife and we both laughed so hard we had tears in our eyes. Pure gold.

Edit: The part that got us was the use in a sentence.
   

Quote"Stay away from Zoey. She's a danger hair-- cute but crazy. Like a poison dart frog."

Indeed! Appropriate science quote here:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]3388[/ATTACH]

Quote from: jhkim;1087318Hahahaha. People here love their prurient gossip, it seems. I haven't seen the show and have no opinion on the melodrama. As for those expressing distaste for "dangerhairs", I'm sure those women are very thankful for your lack of interest in them.

At least they have you, eh John. :p

Quote from: jhkim;1087318Hahahaha. People here love their prurient gossip, it seems. I haven't seen the show and have no opinion on the melodrama. As for those expressing distaste for "dangerhairs", I'm sure those women are very thankful for your lack of interest in them.


Indeed! Appropriate science quote here:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]3388[/ATTACH]

Lol at dangerhairs thinking anyone wants to willingly have sex with them.

You'd have to be a really deranged sexual predator with no game and no standards to want to have sex with a dangerhair.

Of course, most dangerhairs are disgusting misandrist hipster sows who think anyone with a Y chromosome is automatically a sexual predator by virtue of being born with a dick.

And tellingly, a lot of the lesbian dangerhairs tend to be "femcels", having the same mentality as male incels, only from a lesbian perspective instead of a heterosexual male one.

Also, a lot of the femcel dangerhairs have a virulent and bigoted hatred of bisexuals, considering bisexual women to be traitors to the LGBT cause and also guilty of the sin of having "straight privilege" and treating bisexual men with the same despicable sexist contempt they treat every other male.

If you need a concrete reason as to why punk rock was a mistake, dangerhairs would be the perfect example.

They got the idea of dying their hair in bright colors from the punk subculture after all, and most of them are hipsters as well. Need I remind you that the hipsters are one of the many bastard offspring of the punks.

The punk subculture was pretty repulsive on its own, but it also spawned a lot of other despicable and horrifying subcultures and trends.

Goths, Alternative Rock, Emos, Hipsters, Skinheads, ANTIFA and the revival of Anarchism in the current era can all be traced back to the grave mistake that was punk rock.

If had a time machine, I would go back in time to the 1970's and track down both Johnny Ramone and Sid Vicious, walk up to them, put a revolver to the back of their heads and gun them down before either of them could spread their cultural contagion.

jkhim, the next time you're out buying groceries and some Millennial sow with brightly colored dyed hair is irrationally shrieking at you over some bullshit "microaggression" because you made the mistake of saying "Excuse me" while you passed by her in the produce aisle, be sure to remember this post and think about what I said.

Once that happens (and it's only a matter of "when" rather than "if") you will be ferverently in support of both Punk Demolition Night and the Second March To The Sea.

Quote from: S'mon;1087320At least they have you, eh John. :p

Heh! Well, there's only so much of me to spread around. :p

Quote from: Doc Sammy;1087327jkhim, the next time you're out buying groceries and some Millennial sow with brightly colored dyed hair is irrationally shrieking at you over some bullshit "microaggression" because you made the mistake of saying "Excuse me" while you passed by her in the produce aisle, be sure to remember this post and think about what I said.

Once that happens (and it's only a matter of "when" rather than "if") you will be ferverently in support of both Punk Demolition Night and the Second March To The Sea.

I'm pretty familiar with the type. As it turns out, tomorrow is Mother's Day in the U.S., and I just called my son to remind him to call his dangerhair mother. For what it's worth, we did divorce after 12 years of marriage, but we've stayed amicable and have cooperated well in co-parenting.

Quote from: jhkim;1087334Heh! Well, there's only so much of me to spread around. :p



I'm pretty familiar with the type. As it turns out, tomorrow is Mother's Day in the U.S., and I just called my son to remind him to call his dangerhair mother. For what it's worth, we did divorce after 12 years of marriage, but we've stayed amicable and have cooperated well in co-parenting.

Remember, not every woman with brightly dyed hair is a dangerhair.

All dangerhairs are women with brightly dyed hair, but not all women with brightly dyed hair are dangerhairs.

If you were married to her for over a decade, are on amicable terms with each other, and had a kid together, then she probably is NOT the kind of Bolshevik hipster sow that I describe in my previous post, but instead is just a normal woman that just dyed her hair in a weird color.

I think if you haven't watched "Dice, Camera, Action!" you've been sleeping on the greater media spectacle of D&D. WotC is using these people to advance the hobby.

So, it plays as true tabletop RPG content, regardless of critics who nay-say.

When they put these SJWs way out front as representatives of the hobby, there's credence in what they do & say. Semi-authority. It's no different than if TSR had a group of employees run a series of games online.

Mentzer, Webb, Zach S, hell even Pundit --- rpg celebs in their own right, get attacked for every little thing they do that "offends" the SJW crowd. But, the WotC crew is untouchable?

Nope.

I will touch them as much and often as I like. I want to see them exposed. I watched "Dice, Camera, Action" run the revised Ravenloft campaign. While I thought the presentation was garbage, it's impactful because the people they chose, who defended SJW values, have been exposed as libertines.

It's Pie-in-the-face moments like this that reveal the SJW crowd are NOT as pristine as they claim to be. They are not moral paragons capable of telling the rest of us how to game.

This is important in the battle of pushing SJW propaganda away from the hobby.

Quote from: jhkim;1087318Hahahaha. People here love their prurient gossip, it seems. I haven't seen the show and have no opinion on the melodrama.

No opinion on the sexual harassment and taking advantage of women?

Quote from: Theory of Games;1087337I think if you haven't watched "Dice, Camera, Action!" you've been sleeping on the greater media spectacle of D&D. WotC is using these people to advance the hobby.

So, it plays as true tabletop RPG content, regardless of critics who nay-say.

When they put these SJWs way out front as representatives of the hobby, there's credence in what they do & say. Semi-authority. It's no different than if TSR had a group of employees run a series of games online.

Mentzer, Webb, Zach S, hell even Pundit --- rpg celebs in their own right, get attacked for every little thing they do that "offends" the SJW crowd. But, the WotC crew is untouchable?

Nope.

I will touch them as much and often as I like. I want to see them exposed. I watched "Dice, Camera, Action" run the revised Ravenloft campaign. While I thought the presentation was garbage, it's impactful because the people they chose, who defended SJW values, have been exposed as libertines.

It's Pie-in-the-face moments like this that reveal the SJW crowd are NOT as pristine as they claim to be. They are not moral paragons capable of telling the rest of us how to game.

This is important in the battle of pushing SJW propaganda away from the hobby.

Greetings!

Excellent, Theory of Games! Stay vigilant!

SJW's are toxic. They have this bizarre, and maniacal desire to corrupt, pollute, and or destroy everything in society. Art, music, film, books, games, sports, schools, churches, everything. Every institution, every endeavor, must be corrupted and dominated by the SJW's, or destroyed and banned, sued out of existence. Protests, litigation, economic influence, shaming, boycotts, editorial and political control, all the way down to just exerting social control by their numbers. Think about how they react and treat everything. It's disgusting and evil.

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

Quote from: SHARK;1087352Greetings!

Excellent, Theory of Games! Stay vigilant!

SJW's are toxic. They have this bizarre, and maniacal desire to corrupt, pollute, and or destroy everything in society. Art, music, film, books, games, sports, schools, churches, everything. Every institution, every endeavor, must be corrupted and dominated by the SJW's, or destroyed and banned, sued out of existence. Protests, litigation, economic influence, shaming, boycotts, editorial and political control, all the way down to just exerting social control by their numbers. Think about how they react and treat everything. It's disgusting and evil.

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

This guy gets it.

The SJW's are a cult, a secular leftist equivalent of the Religious Right fundamentalists from back in the day.

Actually, to call them equivalent would be somewhat of a fallacy.

As bad as the Religious Right is, the SJW's are worse than them in every way conceivable.

They are more fanatical, more dangerous, more powerful, and even more taboo to challenge.

Even under the conservative administrations of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, both of whom enjoyed widespread support from the Religious Right (and Bush in particular pandered to them) it was still possible to question the Reiigious Right or even downright condemn them without being branded as a Satanist by the mainstream media and essentially de-platformed and unpersoned.

The SJW's even have their own version of the Satanic Panic in the form of the Alt-Right Panic.

Now you can't even question SJW rhetoric openly in the mainstream without being branded as "Alt-Right" and if you condemn them outright, then you're done for. The Silicon Valley commissars will unperson and deplatform you, and the violent leftist gangs will attack you and possibly try to murder you.

The only question would be whether the leftist gang member coming to attack you will be a black supremacist thug armed with a gun or an Anarcho-Communist punk thug armed with a bike lock (or alternately, a baseball bat painted in the colors of the transgender pride flag)

This is why we must be vigilant and stand up to this Neo-Bolshevik cult while we still can.

We don't want SJW's to turn America into Oceania

It is time to rise up and fight back against these zealots.

Never forget that SJW's are secular Puritans!

Let's take back Animal Farm from the swine and colonize the evil leftist ethnostate of Wakanda on behalf of Crystal Tokyo and the Hidden Leaf Village!

Remove Soy. America Strong. God Save The Tsar!

Quote from: Doc Sammy;1087363We don't want SJW's to turn America into Oceania

The future is a boot stomping on a human face

Quote from: Theory of Games;1087337It's Pie-in-the-face moments like this that reveal the SJW crowd are NOT as pristine as they claim to be. They are not moral paragons capable of telling the rest of us how to game.

This is important in the battle of pushing SJW propaganda away from the hobby.

Agreed. It's like the 80s church ladies saga when the televangelists were exposing themselves as moral frauds.

Definitely time to strike.

"Male Feminist" is becoming synonymous with "Creepy Asshole" and THAT needs to be spread far and wide.

Quote from: jhkimI'm pretty familiar with the type. As it turns out, tomorrow is Mother's Day in the U.S., and I just called my son to remind him to call his dangerhair mother. For what it's worth, we did divorce after 12 years of marriage, but we've stayed amicable and have cooperated well in co-parenting.

Quote from: Doc Sammy;1087336If you were married to her for over a decade, are on amicable terms with each other, and had a kid together, then she probably is NOT the kind of Bolshevik hipster sow that I describe in my previous post, but instead is just a normal woman that just dyed her hair in a weird color.

Doc Sammy, given your insults, I'm pretty sure that I don't want to get into analyzing my family in public with you - but I am quite certain that you'd classify her as a dangerhair. Punk rock fan, 90s riot grrl, feminist, disability activist, etc. If you still have doubts you can PM me.

From where I sit, I think there's far more ugliness in the insults thrown around here than in the people that they're being thrown at.

Quote from: Lurtch;1087256Do you guys remember how Gamer Gate got started? It was because a female game reviewer was cheating on her boyfriend. What's interesting is that this YouTuber is in all of this trouble for cheating on his wife but if the roles were reversed, he'd be attacked for slut shaming. Just interesting.

If that were true, the wife would be getting hit with lawsuits and attacked by the media. The relevant difference here is that he cheated with a fellow YouTuber and not with a journo.

It's also a mistake to assume that SJWs care at all about social justice. They regularly prove that they don't. The driving force behind this behaviour is narcissism; the politics are incidental.

Quote from: jhkim;1087413Doc Sammy, given your insults, I'm pretty sure that I don't want to get into analyzing my family in public with you - but I am quite certain that you'd classify her as a dangerhair. Punk rock fan, 90s riot grrl, feminist, disability activist, etc. If you still have doubts you can PM me.

From where I sit, I think there's far more ugliness in the insults thrown around here than in the people that they're being thrown at.

Eh, even with that information, I still would not classify her as a dangerhair and thus any of my insults would not apply to her at all.

She's too functional of a person to even qualify as a dangerhair.

There are plenty of non-SJW women with dyed hair. I have a friend like that, she is certainly eccentric, but very nice and not an SJW.

When my ex and I split, she didn't dye her hair, but she did go into the SJW pool for awhile, pussy hats and Black Lives Matter stickers. Since she got a boyfriend it's eased off pretty well entirely - only thing recently was she didn't want to let our boy listen to Sabaton, because she thought they were White Supremacist. Eventually he convinced her otherwise.

Quote from: Ratman_tf;1087341No opinion on the sexual harassment and taking advantage of women?

Setting up a group and sharing pictures of each other is juvenile, but is it harassment? I have no idea, I suppose it depends on the laws of the countries where it happened, the terms of the group and whether members knew what was going to happen.

Unless the SJW in question campaigned against the type of thing that he allegedly took part in, I don't see the problem, apart from being a juvenile dick in the first place.

Quote from: jhkim;1087318Hahahaha. People here love their prurient gossip, it seems. I haven't seen the show and have no opinion on the melodrama. As for those expressing distaste for "dangerhairs", I'm sure those women are very thankful for your lack of interest in them.

Indeed! Appropriate science quote here:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]3388[/ATTACH]

I wonder if that makes me an anti-aposematist?  Good old science never lets me down.

Science is the marker.

Science, according to the late Carl Sagan, is the pursuit of truth.

How many people even grasp the trans-intellectual aspect of pursuing truth? People want to use science and religion as weapons to assume higher positions above others.

But, it's just finding truth (science) and disseminating truth as morality (religion).

Truth and Morality dissected as Game. Game being the purest expression of functional ideology.

I look at SJWs and see their flawed game and how if they win, everyone loses.

People, humanity, try to embrace the SJW perspective to be comfortable. Can you be comfortable falling through darkness?

I imagined if Hell was a real place and you ended up there - how do you find comfort there? Where's the win condition --- in Hell?

Or, in Heaven looking down, how can you feel as though you WON, when certain friends & family are tortured FOREVER?

Again, this is a f-d up representation of forum posting. I should be  lot less expressive and more accommodating of other views. I should be afraid of public opinion. I should ---

FUCK IT. Tell me what you think. I can accept being wrong. I just can't accept being censored.

Quote from: jhkim;1087413From where I sit, I think there's far more ugliness in the insults thrown around here than in the people that they're being thrown at.

I live in LA and I spend too much time in the Bay Area. From where I stand, the insults around here are laughably light compared to the noise coming from dangerhairs. If somebody wants to be a freakshow, that's their All-American right to be as freaky as they want to be. It's Constitutionally protected freedom of expression. But the normalizing of their freakshow existence into the rest of society? Fuck that shit.

And I'm also deeply unimpressed with socialists driving their SUVs to Starbucks complaining about capitalism and climate change.

Quote from: S'mon;1087429only thing recently was she didn't want to let our boy listen to Sabaton, because she thought they were White Supremacist. Eventually he convinced her otherwise.

Excellent taste in metal! Sabaton is tremendously fun in concert. I've seen them 6 times over the years and got pit tix for the new tour with Hammerfall (another great live band). They are headlining Wacken this year and I'm tempted to go. Sabaton and Alestorm tour the US heavily, but sadly Powerwolf does not.

Here's Sabaton playing Counterstrike (their song about the IDF) in Israel (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsLMt49W5Y8). Total white supremacy!

Quote from: soltakss;1087430Setting up a group and sharing pictures of each other is juvenile, but is it harassment? I have no idea, I suppose it depends on the laws of the countries where it happened, the terms of the group and whether members knew what was going to happen.

Unless the SJW in question campaigned against the type of thing that he allegedly took part in, I don't see the problem, apart from being a juvenile dick in the first place.

According to some sources, he solicited nudes from underaged girls.

https://www.theverge.com/2019/5/9/18538265/projared-youtube-underage-photo-allegations-heidi-ofarrel-game-grumps

Quote from: Ratman_tf;1087545According to some sources, he solicited nudes from underaged girls.

https://www.theverge.com/2019/5/9/18538265/projared-youtube-underage-photo-allegations-heidi-ofarrel-game-grumps

Well then. Want to see how the SJWs spin this one.

Quote from: Brad;1087547Well then. Want to see how the SJWs spin this one.

Probably just blame it on the kid.  Stupid kids sending people nude photos.

Predictable how it has been OK for so long to talk shit about guys who wear fedoras but say anything bad about "dangerhair" and suddenly the usual suspects will have objections.

Quote from: ArrozConLeche;1087654Predictable how it has been OK for so long to talk shit about guys who wear fedoras but say anything bad about "dangerhair" and suddenly the usual suspects will have objections.

Neckbeard is a good one too. Usually goes along with fedora wearer.

Quote from: Ratman_tf;1087657Neckbeard is a good one too. Usually goes along with fedora wearer.

"Sir, you may insult me. You may insult my neckbeard. You may even insult my fedora. But you Shall Not insult my danger-haired damsel!!"

Quote from: ArrozConLeche;1087654Predictable how it has been OK for so long to talk shit about guys who wear fedoras but say anything bad about "dangerhair" and suddenly the usual suspects will have objections.

Makes me want to buy a fedora if this stupid shit keeps happening.

I'm de-stigmatizing the mullet by growing one.

Quote from: S'mon;1087660"Sir, you may insult me. You may insult my neckbeard. You may even insult my fedora. But you Shall Not insult my danger-haired damsel!!"

It is instructive how the sex of the target affects some people's reactions. :D

Quote from: Ratman_tf;1087657Neckbeard is a good one too. Usually goes along with fedora wearer.

Greetings!

Interesting! Since when did wearing a Fedora become something to mock? I've been wearing a Fedora for years. They aren't cheap, either, especially a good one. I think mine cost $150 to $200 dollars. My girlfriend bought it for me, as she said I look very good in a Fedora, and she has always thought they looked sharp and sexy on a man.

In public, I have also had many women approach me, and right up to me and say, the Fedora looks so awesome and sharp on me. I have to say, in my experience, wearing a Fedora gets plenty of positive attention from women, of many ages. Likewise, men as well have remarked how cool the hat looks, also both younger and older men.

Men don't, of course, but in more social gatherings, the women *love* flirting with me, and asking me if they can wear my Fedora, and often taking pics of them, and their girlfriends passing it around and posing, and so on. All a whole lot of fun.

I think that is pretty cool, you know?

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

Quote from: ArrozConLeche;1087663I'm de-stigmatizing the mullet by growing one.

I've been wanting to bring the mullet back for a while. A venerable hairstyle of ancient warriors, keeps your neck warm and doesn't obscure your vision.  I'm in if you are.

Also, velcro shoes.

Quote from: ArrozConLeche;1087663I'm de-stigmatizing the mullet by growing one.

As someone who was a kid in rural Appalachia during the 1990's, I had a mullet when I was a little kid.

It was actually kind of cool and I would definitely consider growing one out again.

Quote from: SHARK;1087684Greetings!

Interesting! Since when did wearing a Fedora become something to mock? I've been wearing a Fedora for years. They aren't cheap, either, especially a good one. I think mine cost $150 to $200 dollars. My girlfriend bought it for me, as she said I look very good in a Fedora, and she has always thought they looked sharp and sexy on a man.

In public, I have also had many women approach me, and right up to me and say, the Fedora looks so awesome and sharp on me. I have to say, in my experience, wearing a Fedora gets plenty of positive attention from women, of many ages. Likewise, men as well have remarked how cool the hat looks, also both younger and older men.

Men don't, of course, but in more social gatherings, the women *love* flirting with me, and asking me if they can wear my Fedora, and often taking pics of them, and their girlfriends passing it around and posing, and so on. All a whole lot of fun.

I think that is pretty cool, you know?

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

The fedora-shaming concept is another example of Millennial idiocy. The much-derided headgear they often cite aren't even actual fedoras, but cheap trilby hats that anyone can buy at their local Walmart or Target for ten bucks or less.

If the women actually see a well-kept and well-dressed man in an actual wide-brimmed fedora, they would likely be impressed and would not assume you are a neckbeard basement dweller

Unless they're a fanatical dangerhair sow, but those insane leftists barely qualify as people at this point.

Honestly, the trilby neckbeard men and the dangerhair sows are both a millstone around society's neck and both should be grateful they live in a wealthy capitalistic Western democratic republic like the United States.

If the dangerhairs got to live in their ideal Anarcho-Communist utopia, they would be dead within a day or two, three days tops if they are really lucky.

Where can I change my username to Mullatino (http://www.mulletjunky.com/mullatino.htm)?

Quote from: SHARK;1087684Greetings!

Interesting! Since when did wearing a Fedora become something to mock? I've been wearing a Fedora for years. They aren't cheap, either, especially a good one. I think mine cost $150 to $200 dollars. My girlfriend bought it for me, as she said I look very good in a Fedora, and she has always thought they looked sharp and sexy on a man.

In public, I have also had many women approach me, and right up to me and say, the Fedora looks so awesome and sharp on me. I have to say, in my experience, wearing a Fedora gets plenty of positive attention from women, of many ages. Likewise, men as well have remarked how cool the hat looks, also both younger and older men.

Men don't, of course, but in more social gatherings, the women *love* flirting with me, and asking me if they can wear my Fedora, and often taking pics of them, and their girlfriends passing it around and posing, and so on. All a whole lot of fun.

I think that is pretty cool, you know?

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

Traditionally fedoras were worn by cool dudes. So now there are a fair number of overweight neckbeards who seem to think that wearing a fedora will make them look cool, too.

Personally I recently bought a Barbour huntin'/fishin' type floppy green hat, and I definitely look cool in it. :D

Quote from: Joey2k;1087688I've been wanting to bring the mullet back for a while. A venerable hairstyle of ancient warriors, keeps your neck warm and doesn't obscure your vision.  I'm in if you are.

It's not a mullet, it's just long hair.  At least that is my reply as mine grows.

I guess you could sum it up as 'male nerd shaming.' Awkward nerd boys take up D&D, and for decades there was stigma around it. Suddenly it's popular now since I guess that the visible people now are more telegenic. If masses of male nerds all of a sudden showed interest in, say, poker, I'm pretty sure that would become stigmatized too.

For that matter, I'm sure that basement dwelling is not stigmatized because of the basement dwelling, but because of who's dwelling in it.

Quote from: ArrozConLeche;1087700I guess you could sum it up as 'male nerd shaming.' Awkward nerd boys take up D&D, and for decades there was stigma around it.

I feel that nearly all stigmas are bullshit. In my experience, there is little correlation between being good-looking and/or fashionable, with being a decent human being.

There are plenty of people who are good-looking, fashionable, and/or rich while also being total assholes. And there are plenty of people who are ugly, introverted, struggling nerds who are still upright and decent human beings.

It's called the halo effect and it's very real.

Quote from: S'mon;1087696Traditionally fedoras were worn by cool dudes. So now there are a fair number of overweight neckbeards who seem to think that wearing a fedora will make them look cool, too.

Personally I recently bought a Barbour huntin'/fishin' type floppy green hat, and I definitely look cool in it. :D

Greetings!

That's right, my friend! Wear that cool hat! Fedora's are awesome, stylish, classy, and cool, as you mentioned. I have at various times worn my black Fedora at work. Trainloads of compliments, from both men and women alike. Some of my friends and colleagues at work would joke that I always looked fucking sharp, and with the Fedora I looked like Al Capone, or some bad-ass gangster.:D Women, especially, are impressed.

I usually wear a sharp suit; black jacket, black trousers and dress shoes, white or coloured dress shirt, coloured tie, black and silver-trimmed suspenders. Silver and diamond watch. So a black Fedora added a smooth touch. I'm always clean-shaven, smelling good, looking professional. It's a requirement of my job.:D

I haven't met anyone that wasn't positively impressed.

So, yeah, it's kind of weird to hear about these Jabba neckbeards trying to look cool wearing a Fedora. The Fedora is a sharp accessory, but it requires that you go the whole hog and look the part. Shorts and flip-flops, a huge belly, and a snarling garden for a beard, I'm afraid, just don't cut it.:D

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

Quote from: SHARK;1087737Greetings!

That's right, my friend! Wear that cool hat!

Googling indicates it's a "Barbour Waxed Sports Hat" - and that the £35 I paid was about £13 more than the going rate online - but of course in the store I got to try it on first.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]3394[/ATTACH]

Awesome hat for marching the kid to school of a morning (3.2 mile round trip for me). Fits really well, keeps the rain off (with the waxing it just rolls off), very comfy. Much better than trying to lug an umbrella around.

In order not to get banned for straying off topic, may I suggest it would be a great quest Maguffin for a modern action or zombie horror game? :D

Quote from: ArrozConLeche;1087700I guess you could sum it up as 'male nerd shaming.' Awkward nerd boys take up D&D, and for decades there was stigma around it. Suddenly it's popular now since I guess that the visible people now are more telegenic. If masses of male nerds all of a sudden showed interest in, say, poker, I'm pretty sure that would become stigmatized too.

For that matter, I'm sure that basement dwelling is not stigmatized because of the basement dwelling, but because of who's dwelling in it.

Masses of male nerds show up pretty regularly in poker. I played in a high-level, for me ($600 entry) in upstate New York and three of us talked about gaming on every break during day two. And this was before the recent resurgence of D&D.

Quote from: S'mon;1087757Googling indicates it's a "Barbour Waxed Sports Hat" - and that the £35 I paid was about £13 more than the going rate online - but of course in the store I got to try it on first.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]3394[/ATTACH]

Awesome hat for marching the kid to school of a morning (3.2 mile round trip for me). Fits really well, keeps the rain off (with the waxing it just rolls off), very comfy. Much better than trying to lug an umbrella around.

In order not to get banned for straying off topic, may I suggest it would be a great quest Maguffin for a modern action or zombie horror game? :D

The Hat of d02?

Quote from: WillInNewHaven;1087782Masses of male nerds show up pretty regularly in poker. I played in a high-level, for me ($600 entry) in upstate New York and three of us talked about gaming on every break during day two. And this was before the recent resurgence of D&D.

OK. I wasn't aware poker was regarded as a nerd past time. That's interesting.

Quote from: ArrozConLeche;1087788OK. I wasn't aware poker was regarded as a nerd past time. That's interesting.

My understanding is that poker is where a bunch of M:tG champions went after besting M:tG competitions.

Quote from: RandyB;1087784The Hat of d02?

It knows no limit.

Where o where is the tallyboard for male feminists vs. non-feminists in the gaming industry doing this stuff? I lost the count!

Can you imagine the shitstorm his life is right now?  From superstar-wannabe, to oh shit they are publicly shaming me to death.  Every time he wakes up, his first thought is, oh shit.

Quote from: Melan;1087235What does this even have to do with RPGs beyond a tangential involvement?

Projared works for Wizards of the Coast. He's a celebrity employee of WoTC.

And yet the same people who were demanding that WoTC denounce my very existence and call for me to be driven out of the hobby are now downplaying the fact that a radical SJW hard-left employee turned out to be a piece of shit... again.

Never heard of him, but then I am happily out of touch. So he was some kind of big deal superfan. Figures.

Quote from: tenbones;1087895Where o where is the tallyboard for male feminists vs. non-feminists in the gaming industry doing this stuff? I lost the count!

It's not only in tabletop. There's a Hugo Schwyzer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Schwyzer) in every rabid, preachy male feminist.

Quote from: ArrozConLeche;1087951It's not only in tabletop. There's a Hugo Schwyzer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Schwyzer) in every rabid, preachy male feminist.

Heh, Schwyzer.  Guy spends his whole academic career a medieval historian then starts teaching Gender Studies classes.  Sounds legit. :rolleyes:

Quote from: ArrozConLeche;1087951It's not only in tabletop. There's a Hugo Schwyzer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Schwyzer) in every rabid, preachy male feminist.

Yeah but I'm trying to keep it gaming related!

Quote from: CRKrueger;1087958Heh, Schwyzer.  Guy spends his whole academic career a medieval historian then starts teaching Gender Studies classes.  Sounds legit. :rolleyes:

So you're saying he has more academic credentials than an above average gender studies prof?

Quote from: Ratman_tf;1087545According to some sources, he solicited nudes from underaged girls.

https://www.theverge.com/2019/5/9/18538265/projared-youtube-underage-photo-allegations-heidi-ofarrel-game-grumps

In that case, it comes under the laws of the land bit and he should be treated accordingly.

Quote from: soltakss;1088341In that case, it comes under the laws of the land bit and he should be treated accordingly.

Absolutely.

Quote from: jhkim;1087318Hahahaha. People here love their prurient gossip, it seems. I haven't seen the show and have no opinion on the melodrama. As for those expressing distaste for "dangerhairs", I'm sure those women are very thankful for your lack of interest in them.


Indeed! Appropriate science quote here:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]3388[/ATTACH]

If the Dangerhair is supposed to serve to warn predators....
How come it attracts the male feminists?
#YesAllMaleFeminists and #ResetTheClock exist for a reason.

See, I thought this was going to be about how he cheated with his dice or rules in a game session. Instead it's something that doesn't matter to gamers. Or shouldn't.

ProJared is an ugly and dishonest pedophile and I would not have sex with him.

But maybe the Aryan Brotherhood will. I'm fairly sure the peckerwoods in the Washington Department of Corrections will give a celebrity like him a welcoming party in the showers....

And if they won't, I'm sure the more down low homeboys of the BGF will.

Get ready to squeal like a pig, ProJared!

ProJared may have an ugly toucan nose, but I wonder if he's got a real purdy mouth on him or not....

Quote from: Doc Sammy;1088426ProJared is an ugly and dishonest pedophile and I would not have sex with him.

But maybe the Aryan Brotherhood will. I'm fairly sure the peckerwoods in the Washington Department of Corrections will give a celebrity like him a welcoming party in the showers....

And if they won't, I'm sure the more down low homeboys of the BGF will.

Get ready to squeal like a pig, ProJared!

ProJared may have an ugly toucan nose, but I wonder if he's got a real purdy mouth on him or not....

If I may: wishing rape upon another human being is uncouth and uncalled for, and does not suit a gentleman, Doc Sammy.

You seem a little tense.

Peace.

Quote from: Lychee of the Exchequer;1088440If I may: wishing rape upon another human being is uncouth and uncalled for, and does not suit a gentleman, Doc Sammy.

You seem a little tense.

Peace.

I suppose you are correct.

I'm just pissed at ProJared because he willingly and knowingly tried to solicit sex from minors. Multiple minors on multiple occasions.

I really fucking hate pedophiles, okay...

Quote from: Doc Sammy;1088443I'm just pissed at ProJared because he willingly and knowingly tried to solicit sex from minors. Multiple minors on multiple occasions.

Is this something factual? Do you have evidence for what you are saying? If so, link it.

There's a huge chasm between posting weenie pics on an adult forum and soliciting underage sex.

ProJared is a SJW shitbag, but nobody deserves to hit with untrue rumors of pedophilia.

Quote from: Spinachcat;1088499Is this something factual? Do you have evidence for what you are saying? If so, link it.

There's a huge chasm between posting weenie pics on an adult forum and soliciting underage sex.

ProJared is a SJW shitbag, but nobody deserves to hit with untrue rumors of pedophilia.

So far the youngest "victim" was 15 at the time, so no pedophilia. There were accusations since before his "divorce" made to his place of work, when the accusations became public he got fired, so far there are 3 accusers, tow have made the accusations directly and one by the words of the first, this one supposedly has evidence.

I agree nobody should get hit with unconfirmed accusations, yet SJWs have years singing "believe the victim". So I'm happy to oblige in their case. Maybe living under the rules they wish to enforce in others might change their minds if they have any.

Yes, the LOLZ are indeed mighty when the "believe the victim" trope chews apart a SJW asshat, but I don't want our forum spreading misinformation.

So what kind of accusations are we talking about? Teens finding weenie pics? Or actual soliciting of underage sex? AKA, he knew they were a minor.

If solicitation, that is serious shit. If we're gonna be tossing that talk about, we need at least links to these allegations.

Also, if ProJared solicited underage sex, I assume there is police involvement so we should see some kind of police reporting.

Quote from: Spinachcat;1088503Yes, the LOLZ are indeed mighty when the "believe the victim" trope chews apart a SJW asshat, but I don't want our forum spreading misinformation.

So what kind of accusations are we talking about? Teens finding weenie pics? Or actual soliciting of underage sex? AKA, he knew they were a minor.

If solicitation, that is serious shit. If we're gonna be tossing that talk about, we need at least links to these allegations.

Also, if ProJared solicited underage sex, I assume there is police involvement so we should see some kind of police reporting.

So far I know of no police report, only the 3 "victims" I mentioned, the second one supposedly made the accusations to his work place, this from the mouth of the first "victim", and now the third one who claims was 15 at the time and he knew, got the lewds and said thanks. Also the first "victim" claims to have been 16 at the time and sent him several lewds while he knew she was 16. Not sure about the age of consent there.

Quote from: Kyle Aaron;1088417See, I thought this was going to be about how he cheated with his dice or rules in a game session. Instead it's something that doesn't matter to gamers. Or shouldn't.

Shouldn't, but DOES, because of Bill Webb. Webb's an independent game designer with old-school leanings being attacked by the SJW/new-school posers.

They continually attacked another award-winning, independent game designer with old-school leanings in Zak S.

They repeatedly attack RPGPundit, the fucker who maintains this site, and (maybe you don't recall) held up the rpg banner on TBP while Ron Edwards & his Forge asshairs argued "system matters" (as long as it was a system that embraced their Left-Wing PsyOps).

According to TBP & EnWorld, Frank Mentzer's the fucking devil.

Meanwhile, is there even a thread on TBP about ProJared the Predator?

[video=youtube;XOeYax787K0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOeYax787K0[/youtube]

The Third Rule of any game or con: "If the opponent is very good, he will place his victim inside an environment he can control."

Ring any bells?

Seems like yet another case of 'polyamory' gone wrong.

• Reddit thread (https://www.reddit.com/r/HobbyDrama/comments/br5uz3/update_to_the_update_gaming_youtubers_projared/)
  
• Holly's tweets (https://archive.is/1De2t)
  
• Heidi's response (https://archive.is/CiDHt)
  

This is why you should never get involved in a relationship with emotional needy people. Friends and allies like these are worse than enemies, and as much as I like polyamory in theory, it's still a huge red flag in practice. And never solicit anything from your fans, because the ones who comply are often exactly this, even when of legal age.

Quote from: Heidi o'FerrallP.S. If you decide to stay in the guest room that doesn't mean you have to bang or anything. I never thought Diath and Strix would be the type to do it right away anyway. But you know them better than me. (https://archive.is/KNquo)

And never, ever, get involved with anyone who has trouble emotionally differentiating you from your D&D characters.

Quote from: Anon Adderlan;1088961Seems like yet another case of 'polyamory' gone wrong.

• Reddit thread (https://www.reddit.com/r/HobbyDrama/comments/br5uz3/update_to_the_update_gaming_youtubers_projared/)
  
• Holly's tweets (https://archive.is/1De2t)
  
• Heidi's response (https://archive.is/CiDHt)
  

This is why you should never get involved in a relationship with emotional needy people. Friends and allies like these are worse than enemies, and as much as I like polyamory in theory, it's still a huge red flag in practice. And never solicit anything from your fans, because the ones who comply are often exactly this, even when of legal age.



And never, ever, get involved with anyone who has trouble emotionally differentiating you from your D&D characters.

(https://i.imgur.com/Qaq2xmM.gif)

What's with white progressive social media stars being disproportionately degenerate?

Quote from: Lurtch;1088979What's with white progressive social media stars being disproportionately degenerate?

Greetings!

Hello, Lurtch! I think it is reflective of the fact that Liberalism ultimately embraces an absolute Hedonism, and an attitude of non-judgmentalism. You can trace this dynamic historically, as Liberals--later attempting to rebrand themselves as "progressives"--constantly yammer on about being "non-judgmental" and always seeking to lower the boundaries in every aspect of hedonism. Telivision, film, music, dancing, literature, and within social life, family life, criminal justice, divorce courts, everything is corrupted, and polluted.

I've heard estabished academics have now written official papers calling for the acceptance of adult-child sex, them saying that children can enjoy sex too, and that such behavior should not be criminalized. See also the growing prominence and influence of NAMBLA. And always, always the champions of these degenerates are themselves highly educated sociologists, sexologists, and psychologists. Always so educated, and credentialed, and very very Liberal. There have also been some indications that a trend is emerging with bestiality being embraced and increasingly approved of. I have also heard of an increasing embracement of incest. All of these developments are merely tentatively discussed and skittishly approved of now--but such approval and practice, will surely grow. In 10 years, maybe a bit more, all of these things will be legal, and approved. They will be eagerly gulped down and enjoyed by the masses.

Liberals love depravity, lawlessness, and absolute hedonism. They will continue to corrupt and degrade our entire society, steadily and progressively dragging our entire culture into a total cesspool of depravity. They love this, they hate Christianity, the Church, morality, and authority. They want our society to be swimming in a cesspool.

How do you think we have gotten to where we are? There are people alive right now that deplore where our society has arrived at. They have seen our society rapidly change in its moral codes and behavior drastically in every way, from the years of their childhoods to where we are now.

All over the internet, all of these depraved progressive degenerates indulge in "polyamoury" adultery, fucking kids, and every other kind of depravity. Often such gets wrapped up in divorce, thus opening the door to more child neglect, shitty childhoods, which in turn become awash in failed relationships, drugs, alcohol, and depravity as well. And yet, the "Progressives" continue to insist and demand that they know the right way to build relationships, they know the right way to raise children, and they know the right ways for everything. While our society continues to choke on shit. Yeah, right right. Progressives are pathetic degenerates.

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

Quote from: Anon Adderlan;1088961Seems like yet another case of 'polyamory' gone wrong.

This is why you should never get involved in a relationship with emotional needy people. Friends and allies like these are worse than enemies, and as much as I like polyamory in theory, it's still a huge red flag in practice.

   Polyamory almost never works in practice, suggesting the theory is deeply flawed. Read Genesis sometime. :)

Man, you guys are funny. If you really think adultery, paedophilia, and lawlessness are more common in 'progressive cesspools' like Seattle than in salt-of-the-earth Idaho or Kentucky, you're fucking deluded.

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/2019-02-11/what-is-the-divorce-rate-by-state

Oh look, divorce rates are highest in Arkansas, Alabama, Kentucky, Oklahoma, and Idaho.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_religiosity

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-most-dangerous-states-in-the-u-s.html

And when we compare state religiosity with crime, we find the 10 most religious states are also some of the most crime-ridden (violent crime ranking in brackets):

Alabama (7)
Louisiana (5)
Tennessee (4)
Mississippi (36)
Oklahoma (14)
Texas (17)
Kentucky (44)
Arkansas (6)
West Virginia (27)
South Carolina (10)

Conversely, the 10 least religious states are also some of the safest:

Vermont (49)
New Hampshire (48)
Massachusetts (23)
Maine (50)
Washington (32)
Connecticut (46)
Montana (37)
Oregon (26)
Alaska (1)
New York (24)

As much as the dogmatic self-regard of SJWs is hard to stomach, the reactionary know-nothing tirades you guys vent here are no better. Two sides of the same coin.

Quote from: Armchair Gamer;1089001Polyamory almost never works in practice, suggesting the theory is deeply flawed. Read Genesis sometime. :)

Greetings!

LOL! Very good, Armchair Gamer! I agree. In discussing such things like "Polyamoury" becoming the fashionable thing in today's society, I always remind my friends that throughout the Bible, even when such is otherwise *legal*--the whole lets have multiple partners just never works out. Even when it isn't the husband suggesting it, but the wife--ala Sarah and Haggar--emotions change down the road, and it always ends up in resentment and hatred, all the way around.

In one of my history classes, we discussed how like, 2500 years ago, a Greek wife had her beloved husband's gravestone inscribed with "All of our life, he loved only me, his wife." The professor made the point that having multiple wives and concubines was legal and permissable at the time in Greek society, and for a Greek wife to purposely have such an inscription made upon her husband's gravestone was a huge statement of intense devotion and respect--and revealed how deeply meaningful and important it was to this Greek wife that her husband loved only her. The subtext of course being, even way back then, monogamy mattered. Monagamy is something that is deeply powerful, and meaningful, whether you are a noble or a peasant.

I'm also reminded of an old story of ancient Rome. An elder Roman husband passed away, and left his wife as the Mistress of everything--their lands, animals, wealth, slaves, and everything. The day after the husband's funeral, the Roman wife had her husband's favourite concubine for the last many years brought before her. The Roman wife, normally serene and happy--had the concubine brutally tortured and killed, right before her. She participated, as well as observed every step of such, face to face. While her husband lived, the concubine was safe. After his death, however, the Roman wife poured out her wrath against her ruthlessly, and unflinchingly.

People don't like their mate fucking around with other people. Whenever you embrace that--even when beforehand everyone *seems* all cool with it or approving--afterwards, it seems to open up doors to uncontrollable emotions and passions that can either be the end of the relationship, or otherwise prove to be fatal.

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

Quote from: Anon Adderlan;1088961And never, ever, get involved with anyone who has trouble emotionally differentiating you from your D&D characters.

(https://www.chick.com/images/tracts/0046/0046_03.gif)

Quote from: Haffrung;1089003And when we compare state religiosity with crime, we find the 10 most religious states are also some of the most crime-ridden (violent crime ranking in brackets):

Alabama (7)
Louisiana (5)
Tennessee (4)
Mississippi (36)
Oklahoma (14)
Texas (17)
Kentucky (44)
Arkansas (6)
West Virginia (27)
South Carolina (10)

Conversely, the 10 least religious states are also some of the safest:

Vermont (49)
New Hampshire (48)
Massachusetts (23)
Maine (50)
Washington (32)
Connecticut (46)
Montana (37)
Oregon (26)
Alaska (1)
New York (24)

As much as the dogmatic self-regard of SJWs is hard to stomach, the reactionary know-nothing tirades you guys vent here are no better. Two sides of the same coin.

Where are you getting your data from?

The examples you provide, you're claiming that Alaska is one of the least religious, but one of the safest.

The Wikipedia link you provide confirms that Alaska is one of the least religious (at least, according to the article), but the worldatlas link you provide shows that Alaska is the most dangerous for violent crime.

Likewise, Maine is one of the least religious (per the Wikipedia article), neck-in-neck with Alaska, but is the safest state (per worldatlas).

So, bunk?  Please, if I've misread something, correct me.

The Wikipedia article includes some US territories, and therefore ranks American Samoa as #1 for religiosity, and ranks Alaska #52 (followed only by Massachusetts, Washington, New Hampshire and Vermont.

Likewise, the worldatlas site ranks the five least dangerous states as Connecticut (#46), Virginia (#47), New Hampshire (#48), Vermont (#49) and Maine (#50).

I'm not sure what the numbers you noted next to the states necessarily mean.

For example, you have Oregon as (26), yet Wikipedia ranks Oregon as 27 by population, 50 by religiosity and worldatlas has Oregon as 37 on the danger meter.  WTF does 26 represent?

Please explain your methodology.  Some stuff lines up with your claims (i.e. Vermont), other is way off (i.e. Alaska).

tl;dr:

Ultimately, if I'm reading correctly, your sources really prove nothing.  Per your sources:

Maine:  One of the lowest for religiosity, one of the lowest for crime
Alaska:  Lower even than Maine for relgiosity, but #1 highest for crime.

Quote from: Armchair Gamer;1089001Polyamory almost never works in practice, suggesting the theory is deeply flawed. Read Genesis sometime. :)

From what I've read of studies, current polyamorous relationships have a divorce rate much higher than monogamy (up to 90%), which roughly matches my personal experience. On the other hand, I know some people who seem to be part of the 10% whose relationships work out. Monogamous marriages often fail as well. That doesn't mean the theory is flawed - it means that people can be bad at implementing it.

I suggest against reading Genesis for your relationship advice, though. Try the New Testament, at least. :D

Quote from: jhkim;1089014I suggest against reading Genesis for your relationship advice, though. Try the New Testament, at least. :D

   Genesis isn't for general relationship advice, but as a good collection of hegative examples of 'here's what happens when people try polygamy, even when it's permitted.' For relationship advice, you look to Jesus and St. Paul, as well as the Song of Songs and commentaries thereon, and St. John Paul II for non-inspired but still good work.

Quote from: HaffrungAnd when we compare state religiosity with crime, we find the 10 most religious states are also some of the most crime-ridden (violent crime ranking in brackets):

Alabama (7)
Louisiana (5)
Tennessee (4)
Mississippi (36)
Oklahoma (14)
Texas (17)
Kentucky (44)
Arkansas (6)
West Virginia (27)
South Carolina (10)

Conversely, the 10 least religious states are also some of the safest:

Vermont (49)
New Hampshire (48)
Massachusetts (23)
Maine (50)
Washington (32)
Connecticut (46)
Montana (37)
Oregon (26)
Alaska (1)
New York (24)

As much as the dogmatic self-regard of SJWs is hard to stomach, the reactionary know-nothing tirades you guys vent here are no better. Two sides of the same coin.

Quote from: kythri;1089013For example, you have Oregon as (26), yet Wikipedia ranks Oregon as 27 by population, 50 by religiosity and worldatlas has Oregon as 37 on the danger meter.  WTF does 26 represent?

Please explain your methodology.  Some stuff lines up with your claims (i.e. Vermont), other is way off (i.e. Alaska).

That looks like a typo. He listed Montana (37) and Oregon (26) next to each other, but in the worldatlas link it's Montana (26) and Oregon (37).

Quote from: kythri;1089013Ultimately, if I'm reading correctly, your sources really prove nothing.  Per your sources:

Maine:  One of the lowest for religiosity, one of the lowest for crime
Alaska:  Lower even than Maine for relgiosity, but #1 highest for crime.

Any distribution has outliers - that doesn't disprove a trend. It looks like there is high scatter, at the very least, and it effectively disputes claims of the opposite trend.

Quote from: Haffrung;1089003Man, you guys are funny. If you really think adultery, paedophilia, and lawlessness are more common in 'progressive cesspools' like Seattle than in salt-of-the-earth Idaho or Kentucky, you're fucking deluded.

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/2019-02-11/what-is-the-divorce-rate-by-state

Oh look, divorce rates are highest in Arkansas, Alabama, Kentucky, Oklahoma, and Idaho.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_religiosity

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-most-dangerous-states-in-the-u-s.html

And when we compare state religiosity with crime, we find the 10 most religious states are also some of the most crime-ridden (violent crime ranking in brackets):

Alabama (7)
Louisiana (5)
Tennessee (4)
Mississippi (36)
Oklahoma (14)
Texas (17)
Kentucky (44)
Arkansas (6)
West Virginia (27)
South Carolina (10)

Conversely, the 10 least religious states are also some of the safest:

Vermont (49)
New Hampshire (48)
Massachusetts (23)
Maine (50)
Washington (32)
Connecticut (46)
Montana (37)
Oregon (26)
Alaska (1)
New York (24)

As much as the dogmatic self-regard of SJWs is hard to stomach, the reactionary know-nothing tirades you guys vent here are no better. Two sides of the same coin.

This guy gets it.

The progressives wouldn't be so degenerate if the old Religious Right weren't Puritan blowhards.

Honestly, the SJW Left and the Christian Right are both fun-hating moral authoritarians who want to ban anything they don't agree with.

Besides, most SJW's are extremely sex-negative and prudish, it's just based in a radical feminist authoritarian mindset instead of the Christian authoritarian mindset that the old moral guardians had.

Despite their outwardly pro-LGBT stance and platitudes speaking favorably of polyamory, the Millennial Left hate sex every bit as much as the Religious Right does, doubly so if it's male sexuality of any kind, and then triple that if it's heterosexual male sexuality.

SJW's are essentially secular Puritans who want the same type of soulless sex-negative society of old, except female-dominated instead of male-dominated.

Again, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Or in this case, for every idiotic overreaction there is an equally idiotic yet opposite overreaction.

Quote from: kythri;1089013Ultimately, if I'm reading correctly, your sources really prove nothing.  Per your sources:

Maine:  One of the lowest for religiosity, one of the lowest for crime
Alaska:  Lower even than Maine for relgiosity, but #1 highest for crime.

I just graphed it from his sources. It definitely has high scatter, but there is a trend line of lower rank in religiosity corresponds to lower rank in violent crime.  

[ATTACH=CONFIG]3419[/ATTACH]

This is, of course, a correlation - not a causation. There are a huge number of other variables in the states that could account for it. It does dispute there being a strong effect either way.

Quote from: kythri;1089013Where are you getting your data from?
...
Ultimately, if I'm reading correctly, your sources really prove nothing.  Per your sources:

Maine:  One of the lowest for religiosity, one of the lowest for crime
Alaska:  Lower even than Maine for relgiosity, but #1 highest for crime.

He is also leaving out demographics within those states, and which areas are 'religious', and which are not.

When an entire states crime rate is averaged, high crime inner city areas can throw the overall numbers through the roof. Despite areas with different demographics and 'religion' within the states showing much lower per-capita numbers.

In other words, don't look into his methodology - just be shocked! And assume he's right.

Quote from: jhkim;1089024I just graphed it from his sources. It definitely has high scatter, but there is a trend line of lower rank in religiosity corresponds to lower rank in violent crime.  

...

This is, of course, a correlation - not a causation. There are a huge number of other variables in the states that could account for it. It does dispute there being a strong effect either way.

Sources do matter: and Demographics matter too...

States with more religious populations tend to have fewer homicides and fewer suicides:
http://marripedia.org/effects_of_religious_practice_on_crime_rates


So we can go back and forth playing google-fu all day...

Quote from: jhkim;1089024I just graphed it from his sources. It definitely has high scatter, but there is a trend line of lower rank in religiosity corresponds to lower rank in violent crime.  

[ATTACH=CONFIG]3419[/ATTACH]

This is, of course, a correlation - not a causation. There are a huge number of other variables in the states that could account for it. It does dispute there being a strong effect either way.

This is BS pushed by anti-theists (not the same as atheists even if all anti-theists are atheists the same isn't true in reverse), You find more relation with education, family structure (more single mothers more crime), community cohesion, and economic status.

Quote from: GeekyBugle;1089061This is BS pushed by anti-theists (not the same as atheists even if all anti-theists are atheists the same isn't true in reverse), You find more relation with education, family structure (more single mothers more crime), community cohesion, and economic status.

Some data was offered - it was disputed - I put up the full data to show the scatter. And I specifically said that it was correlation, not causation. I agree that the correlation is not strong (high scatter), and that other variables will have a stronger prediction.

Personally, I think Christianity is a good influence. However, people can be Christian and still be total assholes - so it's not an overwhelming influence.

Quote from: jhkim;1089064Some data was offered - it was disputed - I put up the full data to show the scatter. And I specifically said that it was correlation, not causation. I agree that the correlation is not strong (high scatter), and that other variables will have a stronger prediction.

Personally, I think Christianity is a good influence. However, people can be Christian and still be total assholes - so it's not an overwhelming influence.

Didn't mean to imply it was you pushing the BS, sorry.

Christianity is a good influence because it pushes for the marriage to survive and makes a community more cohesive by offering a common point. The same could be said of other religions if they do those two things and don't push to destroy the host country.

Agreed, you can find massive assholes everywhere no matter their beliefs (or lack of).

Only one caveat, when any religion (maybe with the exception of jainism) is taken to the extreme and becomes a fundamentalist branch of the religion.

I love how this kind of fire and brimstone tirade goes unremarked on this forum:

QuoteSee also the growing prominence and influence of NAMBLA. And always, always the champions of these degenerates are themselves highly educated sociologists, sexologists, and psychologists. Always so educated, and credentialed, and very very Liberal. There have also been some indications that a trend is emerging with bestiality being embraced and increasingly approved of. I have also heard of an increasing embracement of incest...

Liberals love depravity, lawlessness, and absolute hedonism. They will continue to corrupt and degrade our entire society, steadily and progressively dragging our entire culture into a total cesspool of depravity. They love this, they hate Christianity, the Church, morality, and authority. They want our society to be swimming in a cesspool.

But a post using data to challenge the assertion that irreligious communities are cesspools of vice gets picked apart.

This place is a mirror-image of RPGnet. The opposite of batshit dogmatic tribalism isn't the truth. It's just another kind of batship dogmatic  tribalism.

Quote from: Haffrung;1089074I love how this kind of fire and brimstone tirade goes unremarked on this forum:



But a post using data to challenge the assertion that irreligious communities are cesspools of vice gets picked apart.

This place is a mirror-image of RPGnet. The opposite of batshit dogmatic tribalism isn't the truth. It's just another kind of batship dogmatic  tribalism.

Go to rpg.net and post a rebuttal against (pulls topic out of a hat) rape culture. See how far you get.
Meanwhile you can post exactly what you've posted here. And keep posting.
That's the difference.

Quote from: Haffrung;1089074I love how this kind of fire and brimstone tirade goes unremarked on this forum:



But a post using data to challenge the assertion that irreligious communities are cesspools of vice gets picked apart.

This place is a mirror-image of RPGnet. The opposite of batshit dogmatic tribalism isn't the truth. It's just another kind of batship dogmatic  tribalism.

Greetings!

Haffrung, these various topics are things I have read in the news. I was shocked when I read of some moron psychologist at a known university back east somewhere wrote a paper defending child/adult sex. At one time in this country, even suggesting such an attitude would have gotten your career roasted. Now, however, these various *liberal* academics have gradually been moving and writing in support of this kind of shit. Same thing with NAMBLA, and the other stuff. It isn't like I just made this stuff up, Haffrung.

I have read of it, however, and these topics are slowly gaining more and more support. I wish that it wasn't true, Haffrung, but again, I've seen these things bubble up over the recent years. And every time, it is some Liberal nutjob supporting it, coddling it, or chewy-chewy backpeddling it, while tap-dancing so they don't actually "judge" anyone, or anyone's special preferences, kinks, or bizarre beliefs.

And yes, there is some conservative, church-going types that also support this BS. But they sure as fuck don't do it publicly. Most conservatives I know would have these kinds of degenerates strung the fuck up.

I point this stuff out for discussion, because I have read it is slowly gaining credibility, and is supported by degenerate Liberals. The same way that every other vice in our society has been supported by degenerate Liberals, from "No-Fault" Divorce, to Abortion on Demand, to coddling criminals, to pumping our schools with more and more sex education, including teaching grade schoolers about anal sex and other BS, to being tolerant of drugs, and on and on and on.

Again, historically, most conservatives have not supported such ideas. But many, many Liberals have gulped that shit down--while also constantly working to make sure all of the cesspool gets shoved down everyone else's throats as well, whether they approve of it or not.

Oh, and another thing, Haffrung. Maybe up there in Liberal-dominated Canada few people oppose their culture being drowned into a cesspool, but here, in America, and right here on our forums, are many, many people that stand against and oppose probably 90% of the Liberal agenda on virtually everything. Again and again, it isn't conservative, *church-going* folks that are fighting to pump this shit into our schools, our courts, and our society. It's always fucking Liberals.

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

Eh, I hate liberal degeneracy too, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

NAMBLA are a bunch of sick fucks who should fuck off and die, but let's not kid ourselves and deny that the War on Drugs was a failure from the onset and that outlawing abortion and divorce would actually make things any better.

I'm all for legal weed and legal abortion (especially in the cases of rape, incest, or a medical emergency) but I'm just as disgusted by the other aspects of the Left's agenda as I am with the agendas of the Religious Right. Both are fun-hating tyrants and moral authoritarians.

Just because NAMBLA are evil, it does not mean that Westboro Baptist Church is good.

We shouldn't trade one dystopia for another.

The Soviets were scum through and through, but so were the Puritans.

Quote from: Doc Sammy;1089090Eh, I hate liberal degeneracy too, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

What a fucking fence-sitter, agreeing with certain policies and agendas you agree with from otherwise opposing viewpoints but not unanimously agreeing with all the others due to party affiliation. How about go get indoctrinated by someone and come back so you can throw your feces like a real man, idiot loser.

Quote from: Haffrung;1089003Man, you guys are funny. If you really think adultery, paedophilia, and lawlessness are more common in 'progressive cesspools' like Seattle than in salt-of-the-earth Idaho or Kentucky, you're fucking deluded.

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/2019-02-11/what-is-the-divorce-rate-by-state

Oh look, divorce rates are highest in Arkansas, Alabama, Kentucky, Oklahoma, and Idaho.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_religiosity

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-most-dangerous-states-in-the-u-s.html

And when we compare state religiosity with crime, we find the 10 most religious states are also some of the most crime-ridden (violent crime ranking in brackets):

Alabama (7)
Louisiana (5)
Tennessee (4)
Mississippi (36)
Oklahoma (14)
Texas (17)
Kentucky (44)
Arkansas (6)
West Virginia (27)
South Carolina (10)

Conversely, the 10 least religious states are also some of the safest:

Vermont (49)
New Hampshire (48)
Massachusetts (23)
Maine (50)
Washington (32)
Connecticut (46)
Montana (37)
Oregon (26)
Alaska (1)
New York (24)

As much as the dogmatic self-regard of SJWs is hard to stomach, the reactionary know-nothing tirades you guys vent here are no better. Two sides of the same coin.

Since we are picking random data points out to try to make political points. What % of the population in the states with high violent crime are black versus the states with low violent crime?

I know you're stupid but picking a couple variables out to try to make a political point opens you up to some really evil stuff.

Quote from: Ratman_tf;1089077Go to rpg.net and post a rebuttal against (pulls topic out of a hat) rape culture. See how far you get.
Meanwhile you can post exactly what you've posted here. And keep posting.
That's the difference.

Haffrung doesn't want to go down the road he is going down but he's too stupid to realize it.

Quote from: Antiquation!;1089095What a fucking fence-sitter, agreeing with certain policies and agendas you agree with from otherwise opposing viewpoints but not unanimously agreeing with all the others due to party affiliation. How about go get indoctrinated by someone and come back so you can throw your feces like a real man, idiot loser.

Are you being sarcastic or something?

The internet combined with my autism has made it difficult to tell whether or not someone online is being sarcastic or if it's a case of Poe's Law in full effect...

Quote from: Doc Sammy;1089101Are you being sarcastic or something?

The internet combined with my autism has made it difficult to tell whether or not someone online is being sarcastic or if it's a case of Poe's Law in full effect...

Definite sarcasm. ;)

Quote from: Antiquation!;1089108Definite sarcasm. ;)

Thank you for the clarification, my good man.

Quote from: Jaeger;1089037He is also leaving out demographics within those states, and which areas are 'religious', and which are not.

When an entire states crime rate is averaged, high crime inner city areas can throw the overall numbers through the roof. Despite areas with different demographics and 'religion' within the states showing much lower per-capita numbers.

In other words, don't look into his methodology - just be shocked! And assume he's right.

Did you say, Demographics?  Here comes Logic to the rescue.  Two thumps up, for Logic!!!

Late to the party, but I didn't see it mentioned here on a quick gloss through, but do you all realize this issue with ProJared also came to light because of his wife Holly's connection with the KickVic movement? These SJW's hit jobs and their backlash are crossing genre's now, from Anime (the KickVic saga) to games and beyond. While it seems they are losing, they are increasing these attacks in scope and desperation.

But WHAT IF we're the devil?

What if the Social Justice people are correct?

What if we're wrong and TBP has a moral standard that escapes us?

What if TheRpgSite is a ridiculous trollcave?

We should let these good people be. Their outcry is clearly justified.

What if we're not smart enough to understand the greater argument of "Social Justice"?

[video=youtube;92gP2J0CUjc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92gP2J0CUjc[/youtube]

Quote from: Theory of Games;1089250But WHAT IF we're the devil?

[video=youtube;hn1VxaMEjRU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn1VxaMEjRU[/youtube]

Quote from: Theory of Games;1089250But WHAT IF we're the devil?

What if the Social Justice people are correct?

What if we're wrong and TBP has a moral standard that escapes us?

What if TheRpgSite is a ridiculous trollcave?

We should let these good people be. Their outcry is clearly justified.

What if we're not smart enough to understand the greater argument of "Social Justice"?

[video=youtube;92gP2J0CUjc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92gP2J0CUjc[/youtube]

It's a good thing to always take stock of your beliefs to make sure they align with reality and your morality. However this reminds me of the old adage... "Keep an open mind, but not so open that it falls out of your head." The real question is, do you think they ever even consider that possibility of their own fallibility, or do they spend most of their time in self congratulatory, faux moral smugness?

Quote from: Anon Adderlan;1088961Seems like yet another case of 'polyamory' gone wrong.

I've never seen it go right. Humans are weird about sex. One night stand orgies kinda work because there's no aftermath as all the participants go their separate ways, but swingers live in a minefield. It's bad enough for couples to argue about "you looked at my sister's ass, you were flirting with my brother" versus "I liked being fucked by that guy more than you, that girl's body was so much better than yours".

Sorry, don't need the drama.

Quote from: Anon Adderlan;1088961And never, ever, get involved with anyone who has trouble emotionally differentiating you from your D&D characters.

Hey baby, I fuck like a Half-Orc bard!

Quote from: Haffrung;1089074I love how this kind of fire and brimstone tirade goes unremarked on this forum:

You are 100% welcome to remark upon anything you feel needs remarking upon.

Do you disagree there is an intelligentsia promoting the acceptance of pedophilia?

I saw an article Shark was referencing and it was creepy as fuck. But for me, the WAY bigger promoters of pedophilia is the MSM. Remember Jon Benet? The child "beauty queen" who was murdered. The media always used her glam shots in their depictions, not family photos of a child being a child. And now the MSM is promoting "Desmond is Amazing" a pre-pubescent boy who does striptease drag shows cheered as a trans role model.

The USA has a very fucked up relationship with children and sex in our media. It's a bad combo of puritanism and voyeurism.

Quote from: Razor 007;1089130Did you say, Demographics?  Here comes Logic to the rescue.  Two thumps up, for Logic!!!

Boo!! Logic ruins all the fun.

:cool:

Quote from: Theory of Games;1089250But WHAT IF we're the devil?

Dibs on Khorne!!!

BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE!!!

Quote from: Theory of Games;1089250What if the Social Justice people are correct?

What if we're wrong and TBP has a moral standard that escapes us?

If we drank all the whiskey in Scotland and all the tequila in Mexico, we still couldn't come around to those questions making a shred of sense!!

No. SJWs don't give an actual fuck about women, minorities or the disabled. It's all virtue signalling white knight bullshit.

If you believe in equality, you believe others can champion themselves, control themselves and think and speak for themselves.

Quote from: Theory of Games;1089250What if TheRpgSite is a ridiculous trollcave?

We are are ridiculous trollcave!!! That's why this place is so much fun, but here EVERYONE is welcome to be a ridiculous troll in our ridiculous cave.

Is poly that lasts six years with the same people and all three of them are still friends "gone wrong?" If so, I'll take the memories and let you puritans be right.