This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Shockingly, WokeSR Furious At the OSR Game Jam on Itch.io

Started by RPGPundit, March 04, 2022, 08:04:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Theory of Games

If you could ignore 5e & the Wokenfold for 30 days, they might disappear. Sometimes I wonder if you aren't a Woke mole screaming at them just to give them relevance.

Leave them alone and they will die quietly.
TTRPGs are just games. Friends are forever.

GeekyBugle

Quote from: Theory of Games on March 08, 2022, 07:08:58 PM
If you could ignore 5e & the Wokenfold for 30 days, they might disappear. Sometimes I wonder if you aren't a Woke mole screaming at them just to give them relevance.

Leave them alone and they will die quietly.

Totally, Pundit is to blame for the woke infestation on all media, entertainment, corporations and academia.  ::)
Quote from: Rhedyn

Here is why this forum tends to be so stupid. Many people here think Joe Biden is "The Left", when he is actually Far Right and every US republican is just an idiot.

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."

― George Orwell

Dropbear

Quote from: HappyDaze on March 08, 2022, 04:11:47 PM
Quote from: GeekyBugle on March 08, 2022, 12:35:15 PM
Quote from: HappyDaze on March 08, 2022, 12:15:22 PM
Quote from: Abraxus on March 08, 2022, 12:08:17 PM
What gets me is that each time cocksuck soyarmy was asked to provide a burden of proof or a citation he was unable to beyond " check the internet ".
Yeah..no if your going to make a personal attack on someone character and claim it to be 100% true it's on you to do the work. Not for those listening to you.

Again this place is not rpg.net where absolute proof is your fellow SJW buddies claiming it's true.
IRL, it's always ultimately the responsibility of the audience to do the research and fact checking. Sure, you can hope that the presenter will do that, but if they don't (or worse, they do but in an incompetent or even a misleading manner), it's still the audience that has to decide what to do with/about it. That said, it sure is appreciated when the presenter cites sources, but outside of certain situations (e.g., academics, professional publications) such isn't the norm.

"Because we're currently able to defame anyone without a shred of evidence no one should demand such evidence ever"

Fuck off HappyDerp.

Pics or it didn't happen, Either cocksuck soyarmy can back up his extraordinary claims or he'll be called a liar.
Courts of law can demand evidence. GeekyNobody can fuck right off.

Those who slip things sideways out of their head and expect others to believe them with no proof behind their statements beyond "I think/I heard a bunch of people think this thing" can fuck right off. Court of law or no. They simply aren't worth your time arguing with or listening to. Their claims may beg to be investigated, but that's usually just their way of crying out for attention. And since they can't get any positive attention in their everyday interactions, they feel rewarded by negative attention.

HappyDaze

Quote from: Dropbear on March 09, 2022, 06:55:08 AM
Quote from: HappyDaze on March 08, 2022, 04:11:47 PM
Quote from: GeekyBugle on March 08, 2022, 12:35:15 PM
Quote from: HappyDaze on March 08, 2022, 12:15:22 PM
Quote from: Abraxus on March 08, 2022, 12:08:17 PM
What gets me is that each time cocksuck soyarmy was asked to provide a burden of proof or a citation he was unable to beyond " check the internet ".
Yeah..no if your going to make a personal attack on someone character and claim it to be 100% true it's on you to do the work. Not for those listening to you.

Again this place is not rpg.net where absolute proof is your fellow SJW buddies claiming it's true.
IRL, it's always ultimately the responsibility of the audience to do the research and fact checking. Sure, you can hope that the presenter will do that, but if they don't (or worse, they do but in an incompetent or even a misleading manner), it's still the audience that has to decide what to do with/about it. That said, it sure is appreciated when the presenter cites sources, but outside of certain situations (e.g., academics, professional publications) such isn't the norm.

"Because we're currently able to defame anyone without a shred of evidence no one should demand such evidence ever"

Fuck off HappyDerp.

Pics or it didn't happen, Either cocksuck soyarmy can back up his extraordinary claims or he'll be called a liar.
Courts of law can demand evidence. GeekyNobody can fuck right off.

Those who slip things sideways out of their head and expect others to believe them with no proof behind their statements beyond "I think/I heard a bunch of people think this thing" can fuck right off. Court of law or no. They simply aren't worth your time arguing with or listening to. Their claims may beg to be investigated, but that's usually just their way of crying out for attention. And since they can't get any positive attention in their everyday interactions, they feel rewarded by negative attention.
Care to cite a source for that?

THE_Leopold

#49
Quote from: RPGPundit on March 08, 2022, 03:26:13 PM



Worth it though. Especially the last five hours!


That was interesting and painful to listen to as the circular logic on HD kept repeating himself ad nauseum.    If it was just you and Max that would've been fine but HD was drunk as a skunk and I was hoping there would be more points to be made near the last hour.

Got to the end now I'm watching the original video.  The leaps in logic and dismissal of reading what was posted is astounding.  I don't think it took this guy 40hrs to make the video, more in the hundreds as he had to edit shit out left and right. 

All to be wrong.

God bless John Potato
NKL4Lyfe

Dropbear

Quote from: HappyDaze on March 09, 2022, 08:18:20 AM
Quote from: Dropbear on March 09, 2022, 06:55:08 AM
Quote from: HappyDaze on March 08, 2022, 04:11:47 PM
Quote from: GeekyBugle on March 08, 2022, 12:35:15 PM
Quote from: HappyDaze on March 08, 2022, 12:15:22 PM
Quote from: Abraxus on March 08, 2022, 12:08:17 PM
What gets me is that each time cocksuck soyarmy was asked to provide a burden of proof or a citation he was unable to beyond " check the internet ".
Yeah..no if your going to make a personal attack on someone character and claim it to be 100% true it's on you to do the work. Not for those listening to you.

Again this place is not rpg.net where absolute proof is your fellow SJW buddies claiming it's true.
IRL, it's always ultimately the responsibility of the audience to do the research and fact checking. Sure, you can hope that the presenter will do that, but if they don't (or worse, they do but in an incompetent or even a misleading manner), it's still the audience that has to decide what to do with/about it. That said, it sure is appreciated when the presenter cites sources, but outside of certain situations (e.g., academics, professional publications) such isn't the norm.

"Because we're currently able to defame anyone without a shred of evidence no one should demand such evidence ever"

Fuck off HappyDerp.

Pics or it didn't happen, Either cocksuck soyarmy can back up his extraordinary claims or he'll be called a liar.
Courts of law can demand evidence. GeekyNobody can fuck right off.

Those who slip things sideways out of their head and expect others to believe them with no proof behind their statements beyond "I think/I heard a bunch of people think this thing" can fuck right off. Court of law or no. They simply aren't worth your time arguing with or listening to. Their claims may beg to be investigated, but that's usually just their way of crying out for attention. And since they can't get any positive attention in their everyday interactions, they feel rewarded by negative attention.
Care to cite a source for that?

Theory of Games, post #45

Mishihari

Quote from: HappyDaze on March 09, 2022, 08:18:20 AM
Care to cite a source for that?

That was an opinion, not a statement of fact.  Opinions do not require proof.  Learn to logic.

HappyDaze

Quote from: Mishihari on March 09, 2022, 04:34:16 PM
Quote from: HappyDaze on March 09, 2022, 08:18:20 AM
Care to cite a source for that?

That was an opinion, not a statement of fact.  Opinions do not require proof.  Learn to logic.
You might be surprised how freely facts and opinions mix here, as there are no formal rules for discussion one or the other exclusively. Learn to read the site.

Mishihari

Quote from: HappyDaze on March 09, 2022, 06:47:04 PM
Quote from: Mishihari on March 09, 2022, 04:34:16 PM
Quote from: HappyDaze on March 09, 2022, 08:18:20 AM
Care to cite a source for that?

That was an opinion, not a statement of fact.  Opinions do not require proof.  Learn to logic.
You might be surprised how freely facts and opinions mix here, as there are no formal rules for discussion one or the other exclusively. Learn to read the site.

Dude, you're just digging yourself deeper.  You might want to consider quitting while you still have a shred of credibility.

HappyDaze

Quote from: Mishihari on March 09, 2022, 06:53:33 PM
Quote from: HappyDaze on March 09, 2022, 06:47:04 PM
Quote from: Mishihari on March 09, 2022, 04:34:16 PM
Quote from: HappyDaze on March 09, 2022, 08:18:20 AM
Care to cite a source for that?

That was an opinion, not a statement of fact.  Opinions do not require proof.  Learn to logic.
You might be surprised how freely facts and opinions mix here, as there are no formal rules for discussion one or the other exclusively. Learn to read the site.

Dude, you're just digging yourself deeper.  You might want to consider quitting while you still have a shred of credibility.
Nobody here has a shred of credibi!ity. This is a giant shit pit that we all roll in. Don't delude yourself that it's anything more.

Tubesock Army

#55
Quote from: RPGPundit on March 08, 2022, 03:25:28 PM
Quote from: Tubesock Army on March 08, 2022, 09:23:19 AM
Quote from: oggsmash on March 07, 2022, 09:20:20 PM
Quote from: Tubesock Army on March 07, 2022, 08:44:58 PM
Quote from: oggsmash on March 07, 2022, 02:59:43 PM
Quote from: Tubesock Army on March 07, 2022, 02:53:49 PM
Quote from: Abraxus on March 07, 2022, 11:41:43 AM
Quote from: Tubesock Army on March 07, 2022, 08:46:10 AM
Quote from: Abraxus on March 07, 2022, 08:44:03 AM
Your the one tossing out allegations and hearsay on a person character. You lose the right to get pissy passive aggressive when your called to provide proof and or citations. Otherwise it never happened.

Sorry this ain't Rpg.net or other work forums. We don't simply trust you for being woke and kissing mod ass.

Who's getting pissy, I just said I find it credible. Lighten up, Francis.

So your just being a disingenuous bad faith troll then. Got it bye bye Francis.

It's funny how often the posters here claim some moral high ground in order to flounce. "You are arguing in bad faith, and to prove that I am arguing in good faith, I shall refuse to engage you any further! I said GOOD DAY, SIR!" That's easily how 75% of disagreements on this forum end up. You nerds really need to touch grass.


  Well, if they are talking to you, they probably do have moral high ground.  I mean in this thread you have reeled back an accusation twice (or maybe once if you dont know the definition of credible) after stating it as fact.  That is dishonest.  You know how moral high ground works right?

I'm not reeling back anything, dipshit. I believe that Taylor Lane is blackcat. That hasn't changed. You can believe whatever you like. Perhaps you think it's all a big coincidence that the blackcat account got nuked as soon as the allegation was made, or that Taylor hasn't denied it. The last bit tells me they know that someone has receipts. But like I said, you do you, I don't give a fuck.

  Except you have walked back your accusation, twice.  If you are now saying that was not your intent, ok.  It would be cool for the forum to have a big meet up, then we could all call one another names in person.  I think you would have a blast.

I don't know, I'd hate to tangle with a guy who makes threats on the internet lmao.

Also, it wasn't an "EssJayDub" who outed Taylor/blackcat. It was a friend of theirs.

The first person I saw making the claim was definitely a leftist SJW, who's claim to the assertion was just that "they sound like that person". That's it.  If you have anything predating that, or better proof, go right ahead. Post it.











KEK

Tubesock Army

Quote from: Theory of Games on March 08, 2022, 07:08:58 PM
If you could ignore 5e & the Wokenfold for 30 days, they might disappear. Sometimes I wonder if you aren't a Woke mole screaming at them just to give them relevance.

Leave them alone and they will die quietly.

30 DAYS TO FLATTEN THE CURVE

Shasarak

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on March 08, 2022, 03:42:21 PM
Fuck what the wokies and zoomers think. I got banned from a zoomer discord (I didn't have a choice of venue because it was a really obscure topic) for failing to format my posts the right way. I went out my way to be saccharine, even though it was insanely difficult due to my ASD. They didn't care. Fucking zoomers told me that I was too high maintenance for them. How asinine can they get? These are people who send political opponents death threats. Somehow dealing with my completely unintentional faux pas from time to time was too much for them. I hate them. I hate them so much. I have gone through way too much shit in my life. I don't need these fucking asshats ruining every hobby I show interest in. Argh!

I must admit that it would be fascinating to see a saccharine sweet BoxCrayonTales
Who da Drow?  U da drow! - hedgehobbit

There will be poor always,
pathetically struggling,
look at the good things you've got! -  Jesus

Shasarak

Quote from: HappyDaze on March 09, 2022, 06:59:40 PM
Quote from: Mishihari on March 09, 2022, 06:53:33 PM
Quote from: HappyDaze on March 09, 2022, 06:47:04 PM
Quote from: Mishihari on March 09, 2022, 04:34:16 PM
Quote from: HappyDaze on March 09, 2022, 08:18:20 AM
Care to cite a source for that?

That was an opinion, not a statement of fact.  Opinions do not require proof.  Learn to logic.
You might be surprised how freely facts and opinions mix here, as there are no formal rules for discussion one or the other exclusively. Learn to read the site.

Dude, you're just digging yourself deeper.  You might want to consider quitting while you still have a shred of credibility.
Nobody here has a shred of credibi!ity. This is a giant shit pit that we all roll in. Don't delude yourself that it's anything more.

Hey, I have a shred of credibility!





I stole it from GeekyBugle
Who da Drow?  U da drow! - hedgehobbit

There will be poor always,
pathetically struggling,
look at the good things you've got! -  Jesus

Cat the Bounty Smuggler

So, serious question, since I had never heard of this Black Cat account before this thread: what bad things are they supposed to have done? I've been trawling what tweets I can find and... they seem to be anti-woke and pro-Israel. What am I missing here?