Quote from: Gaming ReportThe Grievance Committee of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America has announced the creation of a special subcommittee to handle authors' complaints about Wizards of the Coast.
The announcement of the subcommittee's creation reads as follows:
*Grievance Committee & the Wizards of the Coast
Special News from Griefcom -- a new situation, a new structure, and a call for volunteers: Historically the Grievance Committee has proceeded behind a curtain because most of the cases are resolved quietly, since the science fiction and fantasy community is small, and usually both the offender and the complainant prefer that matters be kept private. Furthermore, we have been able to use the threat of publicity to good effect against offending parties because they needed or wanted to maintain a reputation in the community. As a result, most of the times when we've been able to get justice for our members, it has been because we negotiated quietly with the prospect of publicity as our final gun behind the door.
We are now faced with a new situation, and I think I owe you all some explanation for why we are changing how we work for this case -- and perhaps for others in the future. The purpose is always the same: justice for the writer. But things have changed and how we go about getting it is changing as well.
Griefcom has gradually become aware that there are some sizable number of unfortunate situations surrounding the Wizards of the Coast (WotC) subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., many of which will clearly rise to the level of a formal grievance. WotC's practices in the areas of intellectual property, royalty reporting and payment, required author approvals, and several other areas all seem to be questionable. Until now, Grievance Committee has assigned grievances to particular "desks" -- one for short stories, one for work made for hire, one for novels, etc. -- because this allowed each individual Griefcommer to develop an area of expertise, and because most desks, except the ever-busy short story and work made for hire, would have only one case every few months, a reasonable workload for one volunteer.
In the case of WotC, the potential complaints would fall across the lines between the desks, and they are far too numerous and require far too much research for any one person to handle them all, let alone to form a coherent picture of the problem. After consultation with the President and the Board, therefore, and with their consent, Grievance Committee is creating a Task Force -- a subcommittee under Griefcom --to investigate and handle all cases arising from writer relations with Wizards of the Coast, including those deriving from its purchase of TSR, and with its parent company Hasbro Inc.
Paul Melko has been appointed to head up the Task Force.
The first order of business for the Task Force is to determine the scope of the problem, so I'm asking that if you have published with TSR, WotC, or any other Hasbro subsidiary, and you've had problems --even if they haven't quite risen to the level you'd call Griefcom about -- please tell Paul about it, right away. In particular, please look over your royalty statements and see if there are irregularities or things that look suspicious (very round numbers for sales time after time, no sales at all except for occasional large numbers, or any other pattern that just doesn't feel like accurate reporting), and please check Amazon or other worldwide online services for unreported foreign editions (i.e. you can buy a foreign translation but no numbers for it have been reported on your royalty statements) . We need to hear about your other complaints as well, but those are places to look if you're suddenly wondering if everything is as all right as it should be.
Just to find out how numerous and how bad the problems are, we have to break our traditional silence this much. We think the number of writers being harmed may be very large, and we hope to be able to locate as many of them as possible, and to take steps to secure their rights and quite possibly their money. If you've written for WotC --and many of our writers have, they're one of the major markets out there -- and you think there's something rotten at WotC, you should contact Paul at once. He and his Task Force need to know about it. We are more than willing to hear complaints in confidence, if that is your choice.
Also, this is a call for volunteers. We need more staff for the Task Force.
Any member willing to do the sort of pure nuts and bolts Griefcom work of plowing through contracts, royalty statements, correspondence and so forth to establish the what-when-where is very welcome, and no experience is necessary for that, though attention to detail and willingness to learn are helpful; we would be especially happy to have volunteers who have been on the other side of the desk in the publishing industry, and who have worked in the areas of publishing law, accounting, licensing, or rights & permissions. If you'd like to volunteer, please contact Paul or me at the addresses below.
John Barnes Chair, Griefcom, SFWA 3505 E 13th Ave Denver CO 80206 barnesjohn@mac.com
Paul Melko 8039 Chateau Lane Westerville OH 43082 melko@sff.net
http://www.sfwa.org
Actual Link (http://www.gamingreport.com/article.php?sid=22365&mode=thread&order=0)
I don't know what to think of this...is this a reaction to some older issues (the law moving real slow) or are there current problems with WotC?
They specifically mention "writer relations with Wizards of the Coast, including those deriving from its purchase of TSR", so at least some of the complaints are probably unresolved issues from the bad ol' days of Lorraine Williams.
Just a guess, but the letter makes it sound like the biggest issue is serious sloppiness on WOTCs end in keeping track of who is owed what so they've been fudging it.
Based on accounts of the TSR buyout difficulties in sorting out the state of the company, TSRs account records might have been mess. It's very possible that many authors slipped through the cracks.
Wow...
Well I'm glad that someone's taking the time to shine a light into the games industry because from where I'm sitting it doesn't look like they treat their writers particularly well.
Quote from: Mr. AnalyticalWow...
Well I'm glad that someone's taking the time to shine a light into the games industry because from where I'm sitting it doesn't look like they treat their writers particularly well.
That's kinda what I thought about it.
Look at Ron Edwards' diatribe against the industy (http://www.indie-rpgs.com/articles/13/). His primary reason for the Forge was to combat this kind of thing.
My opinions on this can be seen in today's blog entry.
RPGPundit
My response to "today's blog entry:"
The SFWA is actually a pretty legitimate and powerful organization in the USA. Enough that they have taken substantial amounts out of major publishing houses for this kind of thing. We're talking millions here, their lawyers are pissed off sci-fi fanatic volunteers for chrissakes! Nothing is scarier than an attorney who really BELIEVES what he/she is doing.
Some of this anger on the SFWA's part may still be holdover from the whole Dragon Magazine CD screw up where WoTC put a s**tload of stuff on the cd that they didn't have the rights to. (a mess which lost us the Dragon CD ever being repressed/reprinted on the downside, and on the upside gave Kenzer & Co. the rights to the AD&D ruleset to modify for Hackmaster, to make Kalamar an official D&D world, and the rights to do the D&D comic for awhile.)
Quote from: RPGPunditMy opinions on this can be seen in today's blog entry.
The height of narcissism is to assume that everyone knows were to go to find such a creature.
How about a link, Mr. Mega Ego? :D
Quote from: VellorianThe height of narcissism is to assume that everyone knows were to go to find such a creature.
How about a link, Mr. Mega Ego? :D
You must have sig files turned off.
http://www.xanga.com/rpgpundit
Quote from: VellorianThe height of narcissism is to assume that everyone knows were to go to find such a creature.
How about a link, Mr. Mega Ego? :D
Its in my .sig.
RPGPundit
What I've noticed is that despite this article, WotC is not mentioned in SFWA's Writers Beware page, nor did they make Writer Beware's top 20 worst agencies list.
Hmm.. Curious.
RPGpundit
The thing that annoys me about that blog entry, Mr. Pundit, is the implication that "hack" writers don't deserve to be paid what they're due
Edit: I don't know if it still does, but Dragon used to include fiction. That fiction would have appeared on the CD
Also, WotC used to have free pdfs of old TSR stuff on their website. I know I picked up the Maztica and Al-whatsit boxed sets, plus a pile of Undermountain stuff. I wonder if they had the rights to that
Quote from: Hastur T. FannonThe thing that annoys me about that blog entry, Mr. Pundit, is the implication that "hack" writers don't deserve to be paid what they're due
Edit: I don't know if it still does, but Dragon used to include fiction. That fiction would have appeared on the CD
Also, WotC used to have free pdfs of old TSR stuff on their website. I know I picked up the Maztica and Al-whatsit boxed sets, plus a pile of Undermountain stuff. I wonder if they had the rights to that
Dragon still does run fiction pieces regularly and if my understanding is correct, the fiction on the cd was a large part of the issue, along with some of the comic strips. (such as Knights of the Dinner Table in particular) I believe that they own the articles outright, not sure on reprint rights.
I know that Ben Bova has has some of his Orion stories in Dragon over the years, and I don't know that I'd call him a hack.
Quote from: Hastur T. FannonThe thing that annoys me about that blog entry, Mr. Pundit, is the implication that "hack" writers don't deserve to be paid what they're due
Oh no, they deserve to be paid what they're due, if it was a question of a contract where they have not received an agreed upon amount,etc.
What hacks don't deserve is to be paid more than what they're really due because they want to THINK they're due more, because they think they're something other than hacks.
RPGPundit