This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Games Utterly Different Talked About Online vs. Played By the Majority

Started by RPGPundit, June 05, 2009, 06:26:21 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Helmsman

Okay to throw my two bits in...

The game of Exalted I ran for 2 years was a bit like how Pundit sees the RPG net guys describe it.  I had some setting revisals I wanted to do to the game so I thought "Hey why not let the players carry out the epic setting changes themselves so they feel cool about themselves."  That was the story, so admittedly I was a bit light on them, but we all had fun and it was a nice epic game.

A good friend of mine runs Exalted like new World of Darkness + Call of Cthulhu blended with the most extreme golden railroad philosophy I've ever seen.  Hers is a game of true horror where you watch helplessly as demons tear apart your girlfriend, and if you step out and use your powers in any obvious way you better have a ticket out of town ready because everything and their dire hound will be on your trail 15 seconds later.

Ultimately there's no one way to play it just like any RPG.  I can do power gaming just fine in most games, but ran by a couple of my friends that just doesn't work.  It's the way they run.