SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Battle of the 4th Edition Predictions

Started by RPGPundit, April 21, 2006, 01:46:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

ColonelHardisson

Quote from: Name LipsI don't think it would be a "rebuilt" edition. I think it would just be a bloated, cumbersome book. Who needs 4000 spells 2000 feats, and 300 PrCs?

Christ, if that's what I was proposing, then I'd agree. But that's NOT what I was proposing. Give me some credit. I said put in the stuff - as in, rules that speed up play and other stuff like the new stat block - that has been proven to work and get rid of the stuff that doesn't. I didn't say add in every single fucking spell and prestige class ever made. Keep the core spells as they are, essentially. Same with Prestige Classes. Maybe add in a few that fit an archetype that hasn't been covered before, and that's it. There's been a helluva lot more stuff done out there than just spells and prestige classes.
"Illegitimis non carborundum." - General Joseph "Vinegar Joe" Stilwell

4e definitely has an Old School feel. If you disagree, cool. I won\'t throw any hyperbole out to prove the point.

Nikchick

Quote from: RPGPunditAnyways, have any other industry sorts made predictions about 4th edition?


Matthew Sprange from Mongoose thinks 2007:

http://forum.rpg.net/showpost.php?p=5627397&postcount=42
 

kanegrundar

Quote from: NikchickMatthew Sprange from Mongoose thinks 2007:

http://forum.rpg.net/showpost.php?p=5627397&postcount=42
BTW, anyone know when the new edition of Runequest is supposed to be out?
My blog: The development of a Runebound-style D&D boardgame.
http://www.nutkinland.com/blog/49

ColonelHardisson

Quote from: kanegrundarBTW, anyone know when the new edition of Runequest is supposed to be out?

Mongoose's website says mid-2006.
"Illegitimis non carborundum." - General Joseph "Vinegar Joe" Stilwell

4e definitely has an Old School feel. If you disagree, cool. I won\'t throw any hyperbole out to prove the point.

gleichman

Quote from: kanegrundarBTW, anyone know when the new edition of Runequest is supposed to be out?

Looks like it's going to be using yet another game system if I'm reading the info on the website right.
Whitehall Paraindustries- A blog about RPG Theory and Design

"The purpose of an open mind is to close it, on particular subjects. If you never do — you\'ve simply abdicated the responsibility to think." - William F. Buckley.

kanegrundar

Quote from: gleichmanLooks like it's going to be using yet another game system if I'm reading the info on the website right.
That's alright by me.  I only played Runequest once a long time ago.  

Mid 2006?  So it could be out in a couple of months then.  Cool!
My blog: The development of a Runebound-style D&D boardgame.
http://www.nutkinland.com/blog/49

Phantom Stranger

Quote from: gleichmanLooks like it's going to be using yet another game system if I'm reading the info on the website right.
Well looks like that kills my want and desire for it...:(
All you know, is alone, you see a, Phantom Stranger!
Down you go, all alone, you love my, Phantom Stranger!

ColonelHardisson

Quote from: gleichmanLooks like it's going to be using yet another game system if I'm reading the info on the website right.

Not necessarily. It says that it builds upon previous editions, and that Stafford is involved. My guess is that it'll be a real revamp of the game along the lines of what was done with Warhammer.
"Illegitimis non carborundum." - General Joseph "Vinegar Joe" Stilwell

4e definitely has an Old School feel. If you disagree, cool. I won\'t throw any hyperbole out to prove the point.

ColonelHardisson

Quote from: Phantom StrangerWell looks like that kills my want and desire for it...:(

I wouldn't jump to that conclusion just yet. It can be read more than one way.
"Illegitimis non carborundum." - General Joseph "Vinegar Joe" Stilwell

4e definitely has an Old School feel. If you disagree, cool. I won\'t throw any hyperbole out to prove the point.

gleichman

Quote from: ColonelHardissonNot necessarily. It says that it builds upon previous editions, and that Stafford is involved. My guess is that it'll be a real revamp of the game along the lines of what was done with Warhammer.

Maybe. However it does say specifically "new system". Not that I consider that either a positive or negative. Just something I noticed.

The only edition of Runequest I've ever played was the first.
Whitehall Paraindustries- A blog about RPG Theory and Design

"The purpose of an open mind is to close it, on particular subjects. If you never do — you\'ve simply abdicated the responsibility to think." - William F. Buckley.

Cyberzombie

Quote from: AkrasiaIMO, the differences between 1e AD&D and 2e AD&D were, overall, no more significant than the differences between 3e D&D and 3.5 D&D.  (In both cases, material for either 'edition' could be used with little difficulty with the other 'edition'.)  Indeed, AFAICT, the differences between 3e and 3.5 are greater than those between 1e and 2e.

Whilst I think you have a valid point for the PHB and DMG, that was NOT true for the changes from the 1e MM to the 2e Monstrous Compendium.  THAT was a whole 'nother game.  Take any 1e module and throw in the 2e monsters and you have a whole different, much tougher adventure.

I think people ignore that too much when they compare editions.  2e really was different, just for that.
 

Dacke

Depends on which monsters. The dragons and giants sure got toughened up, but I'm not so sure about the rest.
 

Cyberzombie

Quote from: DackeDepends on which monsters. The dragons and giants sure got toughened up, but I'm not so sure about the rest.
...and powerful undead, and outsiders.  At least.  A large section of the iconic monsters got a big power boost.
 

Dr_Avalanche

I think making a 4th edition not OGL would be close to killing it - all the companies that support 3.5 today would keep supporting that edition but not be allowed to publish material for 4th ed - the incentive for players to switch to the new edition would be very weak.

Unless 4th edition is so similar to 3.5 that you could use 3.5 material with the new edition, that is.