This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Official Amber/Erick Wujcik Forum?

Started by RPGPundit, November 23, 2006, 01:54:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 4 5 6
User actions

Ian Absentia

#75
November 28, 2006, 01:32:26 PM
Quote from: James McMurrayLink?
http://gamecraft.7.forumer.com/index.php :D

!i!

Settembrini

#76
November 28, 2006, 01:37:13 PM
QuoteThe irony, of course, is that the real "thin-skinned Swine" want nothing to do with a site run by him, and he's cutting off his nose to spite his face by railing against the people who are here.

There is much truth in there. I´l have to ponder this.
If there can\'t be a TPK against the will of the players it\'s not an RPG.- Pierce Inverarity

Blackleaf

#77
November 28, 2006, 01:46:01 PM
Quote from: James McMurrayNot really. To apply to me I'd have to be trying to show people that crapping isn't tolerated, since that's the group that statement is clearly aimed at. Quite the opposite, I'm acting in the way the board owner encourages me to act by his example. If this were a different board (say RPoL, the Hackmaster boards, or Star Fleet Battles forums) I'd be acting completely differently because the people that run those places know how to show/demonstrate that crapping isn't tolerated.

So you perceive the board owners as acting like asses, and have decided to act like an ass as well.  I guess that means there's little point discussing things with you in other threads. :(

Mcrow

#78
November 28, 2006, 01:47:53 PM
Quote from: StuartSo you perceive the board owners as acting like asses, and have decided to act like an ass as well.  I guess that means there's little point discussing things with you in other threads. :(

slight correction, Pundit is the only owner of this site.

Blackleaf

#79
November 28, 2006, 01:51:19 PM
It might be helpful if the people who thought the Pundit was acting like an ass, and had decided that they were going to do the same, let the rest of us know about it...

James McMurray

#80
November 28, 2006, 03:03:22 PM
Quote from: StuartSo you perceive the board owners as acting like asses, and have decided to act like an ass as well.  I guess that means there's little point discussing things with you in other threads. :(

Not at all. I've certainly tried to be civil with you, even when we disagree. However, there are people (including the owner) who feel it is their right and/or duty to act like an ass. when they do so, I respond in kind. I'm more than happy to have a real conversation with someone, similar to the "swinification" thread's discussion of varied levels of railroading we had (and may still be having, I haven't checked that thread yet).
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 4 5 6
User actions