This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

maybe they are exaggerating

Started by antonioGUAK, December 31, 2024, 10:45:05 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ratman_tf

Quote from: Zenoguy3 on December 31, 2024, 12:26:24 PM
Quote from: a_wanderer on December 31, 2024, 11:25:28 AMEven from a pragmatic angle, what's there to gain?

Control. The inclusion of this gives mentally and emotionally stunted aspiring karens the ability to control the DMs game, no questions asked.

↑↑↑

This. This is a case of socially maldajusted people trying to get on the top of the socially maladjusted hierarchy.
The notion of an exclusionary and hostile RPG community is a fever dream of zealots who view all social dynamics through a narrow keyhole of structural oppression.
-Haffrung

David Johansen

You know, it's not so bad, my group's been doing just that for years and I just never put two and two together.  Our signal phase is, "Fuck You Dave."
Fantasy Adventure Comic, games, and more http://www.uncouthsavage.com

Wisithir

Quote from: https://theangrygm.com/office-hours-personal-boundaries/There is strong, documented evidence that giving people an implied promise of safety from discomfort combined with the idea that exposure to discomfort constitutes actual, tangible harm, does deep psychological damage to people. It turns them brittle. It renders them delicate and unable to cope with stressors.

Zenoguy3

Quote from: David Johansen on December 31, 2024, 01:32:47 PMYou know, it's not so bad, my group's been doing just that for years and I just never put two and two together.  Our signal phase is, "Fuck You Dave."

Many such cases. as it should be

RPGPundit

LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you\'ve played \'medieval fantasy\' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

Neoplatonist1

Quote from: Ratman_tf on December 31, 2024, 01:26:33 PM
Quote from: antonioGUAK on December 31, 2024, 10:45:05 AM

what do you think?

I'll be the first to say that more than a few D&D players can be socially deaf and awkward. Having said that, this is the socially deaf and awkward solution. X cards and hand signals are passive aggressive nonsense, and I hear come from sexual bondage terminology.
The only thing I agree with is that if a player is uncomfortable they should let the group know. Be a friggin adult and actually communicate with the group.
And accept that the group may not want to cater to your particular quirk, and you may be asked to deal with it or leave. I'm not put on this earth to play Therapist at the gaming table.

I agree, BDSM came to mind immediately when I read that quote.

This is the type of thing people do when they're not friends. I only play RPGs with my friends.

GhostNinja

Quote from: antonioGUAK on December 31, 2024, 10:45:05 AMwhat do you think?

If someone in my game makes a gesture like an X or say "Stop" because they cannot handle the material I am going to make a gesture of my own.

Its the gesture of me poiting to the door and me telling them to get lost.
Ghostninja

GhostNinja

Quote from: Brad on December 31, 2024, 12:43:27 PMNot this crap again...if you're so weak that you can't handle a typical D&D session, you should probably seek help and get some medication.

This.   It would be great if everyone could play games but the reality is, some people simply can't handle them.
Ghostninja

GhostNinja

Quote from: RPGPundit on December 31, 2024, 04:51:03 PMMillennials are so fucking weak.

No Shit.   I saw someone on the big purple complaining about the tomb of horrors saying that it is unfair and it is only playable if the DM gives the players a break and make it less leathal.   I saw someone talking about playing Tomb or Horror using 5e  and they said while characters died, they were able to be reserected and that there were no "permanent deaths".

Players these days are soft.
Ghostninja

Ratman_tf

Quote from: GhostNinja on December 31, 2024, 05:29:37 PM
Quote from: RPGPundit on December 31, 2024, 04:51:03 PMMillennials are so fucking weak.

No Shit.   I saw someone on the big purple complaining about the tomb of horrors saying that it is unfair and it is only playable if the DM gives the players a break and make it less leathal.   I saw someone talking about playing Tomb or Horror using 5e  and they said while characters died, they were able to be reserected and that there were no "permanent deaths".

Players these days are soft.

Heh.

The Tomb of Temporary Setbacks
The notion of an exclusionary and hostile RPG community is a fever dream of zealots who view all social dynamics through a narrow keyhole of structural oppression.
-Haffrung

trechriron

The biggest problem with "safety tools" is that they are not safe at all.

If you triggered someone at the table, the damage is already done. Stopping the game ruins everyone's experience. It's disruptive and stinks of attention-grabbing derailment.

I've seen people bring this shit to a con game and it never gets used. No one is going to cause a scene in pubic with strangers. Well, most people won't anyways.

The only thing that works is having a discussion before play. Better yet, have some idea of what terrible things will be in the game and just be upfront about it. Then players can decide to exit stage left and save everyone the fucking agony of turning a game into a high-drama tv show.

If you're triggered by violence, or a drunk dwarf trying to pick up a barmaid, or monsters, or blood, or dark confined spaces, what in the fucking hell are you doing playing D&D?
Trentin C Bergeron (trechriron)
Bard, Creative & RPG Enthusiast

----------------------------------------------------------------------
D.O.N.G. Black-Belt (Thanks tenbones!)

jhkim

Quote from: Wisithir on December 31, 2024, 01:34:38 PM
Quote from: https://theangrygm.com/office-hours-personal-boundaries/There is strong, documented evidence that giving people an implied promise of safety from discomfort combined with the idea that exposure to discomfort constitutes actual, tangible harm, does deep psychological damage to people. It turns them brittle. It renders them delicate and unable to cope with stressors.

The bolded part is the key problem.

There's nothing wrong with making a game comfortable (i.e. free from discomfort). It's a fucking game, not therapy or military training. I have no problem with people playing horror games of confronting deep fears, but I also have no problem with playing a game that's just easy happy fun.

The converse is this:


Quote from: GhostNinja on December 31, 2024, 05:29:37 PM
Quote from: RPGPundit on December 31, 2024, 04:51:03 PMMillennials are so fucking weak.

No Shit.  I saw someone on the big purple complaining about the tomb of horrors saying that it is unfair and it is only playable if the DM gives the players a break and make it less leathal.  I saw someone talking about playing Tomb or Horror using 5e  and they said while characters died, they were able to be reserected and that there were no "permanent deaths".

Players these days are soft.

So, they're wrong to say that it's not playable - but they're also not wrong to prefer a lower-lethality D&D.

I play high-lethality Call of Cthulhu, but that doesn't mean that I'm tougher than someone who plays a different RPG. It's just a different preference of how to have fun. Just like watching action movies doesn't mean that someone is really a tough guy.

Ruprecht

I used to think such things would be useful at a convention but really they should have special non offensive games available for fragile people. Don't force normal people to comply.
Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing. ~Robert E. Howard

Neoplatonist1

Quote from: Ratman_tf on December 31, 2024, 06:53:57 PMThe Tomb of Temporary Setbacks

So this is the future we have arrived at: all games are now variants of Toon?

Neoplatonist1

Quote from: jhkim on December 31, 2024, 08:49:37 PMSo, they're wrong to say that it's not playable - but they're also not wrong to prefer a lower-lethality D&D.

I play high-lethality Call of Cthulhu, but that doesn't mean that I'm tougher than someone who plays a different RPG. It's just a different preference of how to have fun. Just like watching action movies doesn't mean that someone is really a tough guy.

Someone who can't bear to watch action movies because it will traumatise him is certainly not a tough guy.