This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

New Alternity RPG?

Started by Spinachcat, April 29, 2017, 02:34:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Omega

Quote from: Dumarest;959975Okay, present the evidence. Writing "from Jackson himself" isn't evidence. Provide the links showing Steve Jackson is one of the forgotten creators of Star Frontiers.

Um. I did not say he wrote anything for SF. I noted that he Reed tried to get the SF site taken down despite the site having permission, and Jackson backed him on it.

estar

Quote from: Omega;960173Um. I did not say he wrote anything for SF. I noted that he Reed tried to get the SF site taken down despite the site having permission, and Jackson backed him on it.

The chain of events was basically

1) In the early 90s the site got permission from TSR to host copies of the original Star Frontiers products
2) A decade later people noticed this including Jackson, Reed, etc. An effort was mounted to make Wizards aware and to shut it down. Looking at the site at archive.org it definitely wasn't clear that they had permission to host this stuff.
3) During the discussion between the site and Wizards it turned out that the original permission was made by people who not authorized to do so.
4) But because the individuals had positions of authority and acted as representatives of TSR, the site was off the hook as far being in trouble for hosting the files.
5) After further discussion a new agreement was forged between the site and Wizards that allowed them to continue to host the original products. Some of it features were that it had to be non-commercial and that they had to take anything down that Wizards put up for on-line distribution.

Omega

Quote from: estar;960183The chain of events was basically

2) Looking at the site at archive.org it definitely wasn't clear that they had permission to host this stuff.

1: pretty much thats how it went down.

2: they originally had it posted on the site that they had permission. Reed and Jackson called them liars and pirates. Things were sorted out with WOTC. WOTC asked the site to change some wording on their permissions. Not sure what. Its been a while.