Quote from: SHARK;1075674Greetings!

What? Snowman needs to *prove* that SJW's dogpile people online that dares to disagree with the SJW ideology? Really, Rhedyn? Come on, man. You gotta be fucking kidding me!

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

I guess it is cruel to dismiss the claims of victims when what happens to them is so commonly done by the demographic.

Quote from: Rhedyn;1075684I guess it is cruel to dismiss the claims of victims when what happens to them is so commonly done by the demographic.

Greetings!

Oh, well, I believe that victims should report crimes perpetrated against them to Law Enforcement. Furthermore, retaining an attorney to supervise and process the case. A professional investigation by Law Enforcement, prosecution, and trial, where the criminal is judged, and punished diligently. That is what justice is in our civilization.

I have actually experienced this judicial process first hand. I was a member of a jury for a capital offense trial every day, all day, for over three months. A man was convicted for his murdering an innocent woman. I then agreed to sentence the vicious criminal to be executed.

That is what justice looks like, and the proper--and lawful--process for it. The victim gains some measure of justice, and the criminal is punished.

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

Quote from: Rhedyn;1075673Why do you think you don't need proof for accusations?

You can disbelieve me all you want then.  I don't have have the evidence.  Just keep in mind you need to ask Simlasa for links too if you want to keep it fair.

Edit:  Not like any laws were broken, or I was threaten.  I just had a shitty experience and a story to tell.

Quote from: Snowman0147;1075703You can disbelieve me all you want then.  I don't have have the evidence.  Just keep in mind you need to ask Simlasa for links too if you want to keep it fair.

Greetings!

No worries, my friend. I don't need to see "Links" to SJW's dogpiling on you or anyone else that disagrees with them. I know exactly what liberals are like. I've seen them do their mob-fest right in front of me in numerous classes at my university. The crying, the shrieking, the hysterical accusations that someone that disagrees with them is a warmonger, a nazi, a misogynist, a homophobe, a racist, and on and on. I've seen them do this in classes of 50 students, 100 students, as well as at university debates with 1,000 and more people present. This is and has been the liberal playbook for many years, in person. I've also seen them behave this way online, at other websites, years ago. Again, standard emotionally manipulative, immature, intellectually disingenuous behavior. It's all the behaviour of degenerate, SJW demagogues, my friend.

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

So will they be removing all the consultant credits from the next print run of the 5e books?

I checked and the latest version of Basic has no consultant credits. But that may be a change from last year so this Beyond removal may be just copying the Basics removal?

But.

I can see no indicator of when this latest Basic was last edited. Soooo. Who knows? My older copies from prior to 2018 still have the credits. But those were not one consolidated file like this new Basic is?

Also this is up on the WOTC site and no mention of removing anyone else so curiouser and curiouser.

http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/news/dndstatement

Eh with all the "Sage Advice" and Errata, it's a different game than when it started. Not to mention all the splats and unearthed arcana. This is basically Jeremy Crawford's version of the original 5e now.

Quote from: SHARK;1075572Greetings!

Thanks, Sammy. Well, unfortunately, as Pundit mentioned, WOTC is in the clear by simply removing the entire Consultant Credit.

Apparently, Daniel Fox is also entirely free to go about the public square spreading lies, maliciously slandering Pundit, besmirching Pundit's character at every opportunity, while he promotes lists of hated people to be targeted on a constant basis by the ever-increasing mobs of SJW fanatics that Fox gleefully encourages. All such activity contributing to the public disparagement of Pundit's reputation, and furthermore damaging Pundit's present and future business and commercial opportunities.

Personally, I am dismayed that such behaviour is legal, and that Pundit has no legal recourse to adress such terrible behaviour by Daniel "Zweihander" Fox.

That is not merely sad, but tragic. It is unjust. I hope that Pundit prevails and thrives in great success.

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

I think it's hilarious that every time Fox has posted a link to one of my blogs claiming "RPGPundit is X" and quoting a single line from it, the blog itself directly contradicts his point.

Of course, I'm guessing Fox is gambling on the fact that a lot of people never actually click through to the source material.

Quote from: Simlasa;1075605I tangled with him once when I ran across him declaring Pundit a racist. I'm no fan of Pundit but I stopped to ask what evidence they had... little did I know that asking for evidence/proof would make me immediately suspect. So he and his posse dogpiled me... declaring no proof was necessary and it was somehow 'victim blaming' to ask.

I don't think Hill declaring themselves transgender is all that relevant. But stuff like this IS relevant.  Not to mention that Hill was among those who CHEERED the people making Mandy's life utterly miserable, sending her death threats and accosting her (as she mentions in her facebook post) and treated Mandy as if she were absolute scum, right up to the last second of thinking Mandy was on "the other side".

It tells me that Hill doesn't give a fuck about women, or the abuse of women.

Today Wizards made a statement on twitter that they were not going to include Zak's name in the credits of the next printing of the PHB. They gave no indication of whether they were going to still include the rest of us who were Consultants.

Again, if Wizards removes all the Consultant credits, it's a bitch move but there's not much to be done about it. But if they should remove mine along with Zak's just to placate these fucking Stalinists, there will be hell to pay.

Starting with my pushing the nuclear button and publishing the Mearls Emails.

Quote from: RPGPundit;1075769I think it's hilarious that every time Fox has posted a link to one of my blogs claiming "RPGPundit is X" and quoting a single line from it, the blog itself directly contradicts his point.

Of course, I'm guessing Fox is gambling on the fact that a lot of people never actually click through to the source material.

Greetings!

LOL! Yeah, Pundit! That made me laugh. But yes, I imagine quite clearly that you're right. Most people are entirely lazy, and *won't* click the links that Fox provides under his hateful declarations. So, they just go away, assuming that Fox "proved" or "documented" Pundit being X.

And yes, I followed a link, read your blog post, watched your blog video thing; and you contradicted everything that Fox was claiming. There wasn't even a close connection. It struck me as such bold lying, blatant disregard for the content of what you actually said, and what you were actually discussing, it really made me angry towards Fox. His swarmy, fake cheerfulness, and his blatant attempt at character assassination towards you is just so, *dishonourable*. I became disgusted with his stupid game book, his company, his online posts, and him as a person. Sometimes, Pundit, people accuse you of being extreme, exagerating, or being hyperbolic. You really are quite justified in hating Daniel Fox. He is a terrible, dishonourable human being.

Semper Fidelis,

SHARK

Quote from: RPGPundit;1075769I think it's hilarious that every time Fox has posted a link to one of my blogs claiming "RPGPundit is X" and quoting a single line from it, the blog itself directly contradicts his point.

Of course, I'm guessing Fox is gambling on the fact that a lot of people never actually click through to the source material.

That's because they don't give a rat's ass about the "truth". They don't give a rat's ass about "justice". They don't give a rat's ass about anyone on this forum. They're willing to do whatever they can to destroy you and anyone remotely associated with you. Including anyone from this forum that has ever remotely agreed with you on any topic.

But you know this.

Quote from: RPGPundit;1075770I don't think Hill declaring themselves transgender is all that relevant. But stuff like this IS relevant.  Not to mention that Hill was among those who CHEERED the people making Mandy's life utterly miserable, sending her death threats and accosting her (as she mentions in her facebook post) and treated Mandy as if she were absolute scum, right up to the last second of thinking Mandy was on "the other side".

It tells me that Hill doesn't give a fuck about women, or the abuse of women.

Wait Hill is backing up Mandy?  Is there a link?

So Daniel just claimed me defending my right not to have my name dragged through the mud and associated with an abuser I had no connection to (but, let's all remember, Daniel Fox did have a personal and business relationship with!) is "blackmail". How funny. Hi, Daniel!

Quote from: Grognard101;1075404WOW - this is crazy amount of fall out. Wizards must have given in to the SJWs on Twitter to deplatform consultants.

URGGGG

D&D Beyond just sounds gay to me.

Quote from: Rhedyn;1075750Eh with all the "Sage Advice" and Errata, it's a different game than when it started. Not to mention all the splats and unearthed arcana. This is basically Jeremy Crawford's version of the original 5e now.

Nope. They issued errata saying only errata counts and statements from people who work for WOTC (including Crawford, and including sage advice and UA) don't count as official content.

So errata yes (and there is very little of that) and splats yes (though it's hard to apply the term splat to the very small number of expansion books none of which are in a splat format) and the rest of it is not "official" content.