SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

I think I'm a dying breed

Started by Sacrosanct, August 24, 2013, 12:13:02 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Piestrio

Quote from: Nexus;685443Quick, someone make a comment about her sexist, objectifying boobplate or the world won't make sense!

She's twisting to the side to excentuate her boobs for a male audience. He shield is also placed to be out of the way of the male gaze, subcounciously inviting the viewer to see her as a sexual object.

And don't even mention the giant phallic object she's presenting.
Disclaimer: I attach no moral weight to the way you choose to pretend to be an elf.

Currently running: The Great Pendragon Campaign & DC Adventures - Timberline
Currently Playing: AD&D

estar

Quote from: Haffrung;685435The difference is that in pre-WotC D&D, the players had no means or motive to engage in char op between sessions by adding bits and pieces, feats, and multi-classes, from commercial products that were written for that purpose. You picked a race, picked a class, assigned some stats. Character done. The rest of the challenge is in the gameplay.

True there wasn't char op but there was item op. The drive behind char ops is nothing new. You are woefully looking at the past with rose colored glasses.

If anything it was worse because circa 1980 D&D was it. So you had killers, char ops, roleplayers, etc, etc all throw into one big heap. Then as new forms of gaming arose these groups began to peel off and play the medium best suited for their interests.

Ladybird

Quote from: Nexus;685443Quick, someone make a comment about her sexist, objectifying boobplate or the world won't make sense!

Boobplate may or may not be sexist, but it is fucking retarded.
one two FUCK YOU

Nexus

#123
Quote from: Ladybird;685458Boobplate may or may not be sexist, but it is fucking retarded.

Quote from: Piestrio;685449She's twisting to the side to accentuate her boobs for a male audience. He shield is also placed to be out of the way of the male gaze, subconsciously inviting the viewer to see her as a sexual object.

And don't even mention the giant phallic object she's presenting.

Now I feel better.
Remember when Illinois Nazis where a joke in the Blue Brothers movie?

Democracy, meh? (538)

 "The salient fact of American politics is that there are fifty to seventy million voters each of whom will volunteer to live, with his family, in a cardboard box under an overpass, and cook sparrows on an old curtain rod, if someone would only guarantee that the black, gay, Hispanic, liberal, whatever, in the next box over doesn't even have a curtain rod, or a sparrow to put on it."

TristramEvans

#124
Quote from: Nexus;685443Quick, someone make a comment about her sexist, objectifying boobplate or the world won't make sense!

"remember girls you have to be careful that your male DM doesn't slip narcotics into your coffee"


flyerfan1991

Quote from: Piestrio;685449She's twisting to the side to excentuate her boobs for a male audience. He shield is also placed to be out of the way of the male gaze, subcounciously inviting the viewer to see her as a sexual object.

And don't even mention the giant phallic object she's presenting.

Where does the six-pack on her boob plate fall into?  Wishful thinking?

Piestrio

Quote from: flyerfan1991;685471Where does the six-pack on her boob plate fall into?  Wishful thinking?

Unrealistic standards of beauty perpetuated by the patriarchy to oppress women.
Disclaimer: I attach no moral weight to the way you choose to pretend to be an elf.

Currently running: The Great Pendragon Campaign & DC Adventures - Timberline
Currently Playing: AD&D

TristramEvans

Quote from: flyerfan1991;685471Where does the six-pack on her boob plate fall into?  Wishful thinking?

Signs of repressed violence from an abusive relationship.


danbuter

Thanks for derailing an interesting thread, Tangencites!
Sword and Board - My blog about BFRPG, S&W, Hi/Lo Heroes, and other games.
Sword & Board: BFRPG Supplement Free pdf. Cheap print version.
Bushi D6  Samurai and D6!
Bushi setting map


Black Vulmea

Quote from: danbuter;685495Thanks for derailing a[strike]n interesting[/strike] thread, Tangencites!
theRPGsite: the Big Purple of radical Rightists.
"Of course five generic Kobolds in a plain room is going to be dull. Making it potentially not dull is kinda the GM\'s job." - #Ladybird, theRPGsite

Really Bad Eggs - swashbuckling roleplaying games blog  | Promise City - Boot Hill campaign blog

ACS

flyerfan1991

Quote from: Piestrio;685478Unrealistic standards of beauty perpetuated by the patriarchy to oppress women.

And here I thought it was the artist projecting how they'd like their own gut to look like if they didn't drink a six pack a day.

And, you know, exercise.

Mistwell

Quote from: TristramEvans;685285My reading of it and subsequent exposure to it on forums, was that the game achieves 'balance' in that its possible to min-max every character to the exact same level of combat effectiveness through any class.

Well, I entirely disagree with that.  It is not built that way, that is not a design goal of 5e, that idea was raised directly by Mearls and he said they are trying to stay away from that.  So, I strongly disagree.

QuoteThis went along with players who did not invest into a detailed learning of the rules would not end up with a character at the same peak of effectiveness as those players who achieved (their words, by way of Gygax) "system mastery".

This sounds like a 3e quote.  In fact, it was, from Monte Cook.  I have seen no such quote on 5e, and they've repudiated that idea.

So, I gotta ask, WHERE did you read that about 5e?

Mistwell

Quote from: Sacrosanct;685161Rolling 4d6 take lowest is a min maxer?

Quote from: soviet;6853784d6 drop lowest and arrange to taste has been the expected method in all the AD&D games I've been involved in as well.

There seems to be some confusion over what we're talking about here...