This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

D&D Next vs Pathfinder

Started by Dodger, April 04, 2012, 01:58:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Halloween Jack

Quote from: Orpheo;534030To be fair, and I'm only going to make this one post on this particular PF/4E issue, as someone who quit 4E and took up Pathfinder I would argue that I definitely see elements of Pathfinder that could be inspired by elements of 4E. Not so much in the core, more in the subsequent splat books. The  new combat maneouvres in the APG that cause forced movement, for instance. I know about Bullrush and all that, but the maneouvres introduced in the APG expand forced movement to a similar range to 4E. The rules are definitely 3.5 though, complete with attacks of opportunity to deter you from actually doing them.
Pretty much that, yeah.
Quote from: James Gillen;534033Not to mention the fact that anything that does 4W sure as hell ain't gonna be an At-Will power.  ;)

JG
Definitely not. 4e instead gives you at-wills that scale to 2[W] at high level, and after that you rely on your encounter powers. But 4e and Pathfinder could never have straight-across comparisons in weapon damage, because 4e doesn't stick its foot in the cowpie of iterative attacks. (Instead, it sticks its foot in the cowpie of too many static mods to juggle, and assuming feat taxes and charge/combat advantage to achieve a reliable to-hit rate.)

jeff37923

Quote from: Halloween Jack-Off;534084Fap. Fap. Fap.
:rolleyes:
"Meh."

Koltar

In many ways it won't really be a " VS " situation between the two.

Both games will feature adventurers going into strange places on a quest or looking for 'loot' - in a variety of places like 'dungeons', haunted forests, ruins of past civilizations ..etc.

PAIZO will still win the 'PR Battle' tho - because their maps will work with both game systems, the same with their pre-painted minis for PATHFINDER.  The miniatures are the same scale as D&D has traditionally used.

- Ed C.
The return of \'You can\'t take the Sky From me!\'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUn-eN8mkDw&feature=rec-fresh+div

This is what a really cool FANTASY RPG should be like :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-WnjVUBDbs

Still here, still alive, at least Seven years now...

B.T.

Quote from: Halloween Jack;534018If Paizo was outright copying 4e, their design wouldn't suck shit through a hose.
I think the new animal companion system is very good.  The revamped paladin is good also.  Unfortunately, the quality of Paizo mechanics  vary...considerably even within a book.
Quote from: Black Vulmea;530561Y\'know, I\'ve learned something from this thread. Both B.T. and Koltar are idiots, but whereas B.T. possesses a malign intelligence, Koltar is just a drooling fuckwit.

So, that\'s something, I guess.

Marleycat

Quote from: B.T.;534276I think the new animal companion system is very good.  The revamped paladin is good also.  Unfortunately, the quality of Paizo mechanics  vary...considerably even within a book.

That's true I think that the one thing Wotc has going for it is that once they work the kinks out they build mechanically solid games.  4e is a example of this. Problem is it's a mini's skirmish game not a traditional rpg.
Don\'t mess with cats we kill wizards in one blow.;)