SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

GaryCom just removed Frank Mentzer from the guest list

Started by Grognard101, February 19, 2019, 12:59:17 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Koltar

Quote from: TooBoCoup;1099645Put your tampon back in young lady

You never left Junior high it seems.

Do you have any actual thoughts about Mr Mentzer or gaming?

- Ed C.
The return of \'You can\'t take the Sky From me!\'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUn-eN8mkDw&feature=rec-fresh+div

This is what a really cool FANTASY RPG should be like :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-WnjVUBDbs

Still here, still alive, at least Seven years now...

deadDMwalking

Quote from: deadDMwalking;1099640their own hateful speech

Quote from: Ratman_tf;1099646What do you mean by hate speech?

hateĀ·ful
 
adjective
arousing, deserving of, or filled with hatred.
"hateful letters of abuse that had come unsigned"
INFORMAL
very unpleasant.
"I don't have to stay in this hateful place"
synonyms:   detestable, horrible, horrid, unpleasant, awful, nasty, disagreeable, despicable, objectionable, insufferable, revolting, rotten, loathsome, abhorrent, abominable, damnable, execrable, odious, repugnant, repellent, repulsive, disgusting, distasteful, obnoxious, offensive, foul, vile, heinous; informal ghastly; informalbeastly, godawful, yucky; vulgar slangshitty; archaicloathly, disgustful
"that hateful arrogant old woman"
When I say objectively, I mean \'subjectively\'.  When I say literally, I mean \'figuratively\'.  
And when I say that you are a horse\'s ass, I mean that the objective truth is that you are a literal horse\'s ass.

There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all. - Peter Drucker

Brendan

Quote from: Ratman_tf;1099518Shark driving a shark mecha!



I just wanted a flimsy excuse to post that pic.

How did you get a pic of SHARK at work?

rgalex

Quote from: deadDMwalking;1099640Sure.  Everyone can call for 'unpersoning' people they don't like.  It just tends not to be a popular sentiment here, regardless of which side of the aisle you're on.  I find it amusing that I keep hearing people on the right explaining that it is only people on the left who do that, and that's why their own hateful speech needs to be tolerated, but coming from the other side it's immediately clear that a defense of free speech is only a charade to demand a platform.  

What, exactly, is his bannable offense?

Closest I would guess would be:

Quote from: The Rules"While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW)."

That said, I don't want him banned.  I just wish he'd actually start contributing something useful to the site.  You know, post about gaming instead of tossing internet tough-guy insults at Doc.  The entirety of his brief time here has been shit-posting in a thread that hadn't been touched in 2 months.  If he wants to waste time shooting fish in a barrel that's fine but I'd rather he start a thread and tell me why game X sucks or something.

HappyDaze

Quote from: Ratman_tf;1099639Doesn't that mean that people can also express their opinion that troll boy should be banned? Anyone can put Sammy on Ignore as well.

Sure, but banning someone impacts the other person's ability to express themself while putting someone on Ignore only impacts yourself. It's the difference between putting noise-cancelling headphones on your own ears vs forcefully gagging someone when you don't like what they are saying. Sure, there might be an impulse for the latter, but the former doesn't step on anyone's expression (especially since, with Ignore, these are effectively invisible headphones so the other can keep screeching away at you while you blissfully go on not hearing their nonsense).

And yes, anyone can Ignore Sammy too. I admit I have been tempted to do so, but he occasionally posts some things I find interesting.

deadDMwalking

Quote from: rgalex;1099657Closest I would guess would be: disrupting topics without contributing to them

Quote from: rgalex;1099657The entirety of his brief time here has been shit-posting in a thread that hadn't been touched in 2 months.

If you consider the topic to have been dead, I don't think he can also be accused of disrupting the conversation.
When I say objectively, I mean \'subjectively\'.  When I say literally, I mean \'figuratively\'.  
And when I say that you are a horse\'s ass, I mean that the objective truth is that you are a literal horse\'s ass.

There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all. - Peter Drucker

Mordred Pendragon

Quote from: HappyDaze;1099661Sure, but banning someone impacts the other person's ability to express themself while putting someone on Ignore only impacts yourself. It's the difference between putting noise-cancelling headphones on your own ears vs forcefully gagging someone when you don't like what they are saying. Sure, there might be an impulse for the latter, but the former doesn't step on anyone's expression (especially since, with Ignore, these are effectively invisible headphones so the other can keep screeching away at you while you blissfully go on not hearing their nonsense).

And yes, anyone can Ignore Sammy too. I admit I have been tempted to do so, but he occasionally posts some things I find interesting.

Pretty much what this guy said.

And HappyDaze, I do apologize for my past indiscretions. I do want to post more interesting things and be more of an actually productive poster.
Sic Semper Tyrannis

TooBoCoup

Quote from: deadDMwalking;1099631Bad form.

It's not difficult to add an end quote tag and respond to one piece, then add a new start quote tag to answer the other.  

It makes it more difficult to read your responses and it appears to credit them to someone else.

Agreed, but I wasnt sure how to do it otherwise. Cheers for the tip!

TooBoCoup

Quote from: Koltar;1099653You never left Junior high it seems.

Do you have any actual thoughts about Mr Mentzer or gaming?

- Ed C.


I do but not to an obvious asshole. If you had asked in a different manner then perhaps I do.

TooBoCoup

Quote from: Doc Sammy;1099634Let's be real here, does anybody actually care what this guy thinks?

If you think an openly gay Vietnamese-American is a Neo-Nazi and you talk like a fourteen-year old brat on Call of Duty while claiming to be a professor, your opinion is worth jack shit.

You have the right to express your opinion though, just as I have the right to call you an idiot for it.

I don't know about anyone else here, but I'm definitely getting some major incel vibes from TooBoCoup.

He's apparently very misogynistic despite being an avowed left-winger and thinks that calling someone a virgin is the most hurtful insult in the book.

Maybe he's one of those creepy male feminist hipster types who claim to be for gender equality but really just want to prey on women?

Or he's just some idiotic troll wanting attention. Or maybe he's both an idiot troll and a retarded Antifa punk?

I mean, nothing says that being an internet troll and being a commie chud are mutually exclusive.

You know, I haven't heard from Daniel Fox or David "Olivia" Hill in a while...


Clearly you care very much or you wouldnt spend so much time and butt hurt trying to report me to the hall monitor, ban me, outclass me, projecting your own obvious shortcomings on me, etc. i know the truth hurts which is why you have such an outsized reaction compared to the other alt right ladies here.

TooBoCoup

Quote from: deadDMwalking;1099640Sure.  Everyone can call for 'unpersoning' people they don't like.  It just tends not to be a popular sentiment here, regardless of which side of the aisle you're on.  I find it amusing that I keep hearing people on the right explaining that it is only people on the left who do that, and that's why their own hateful speech needs to be tolerated, but coming from the other side it's immediately clear that a defense of free speech is only a charade to demand a platform.  

What, exactly, is his bannable offense?

This^

Mordred Pendragon

#341
Quote from: TooBoCoup;1099669Fap Fap Fap Fap

Grown-ups are trying to have an actual conversation here. If you want to fantasize about being a professor while masturbating to pictures of Brie Larson, do it in your bedroom.

And for God's sake, close the goddamn door this time!
Sic Semper Tyrannis

deadDMwalking

Quote from: TooBoCoup;1099667Agreed, but I wasnt sure how to do it otherwise. Cheers for the tip!

Quote from: TooBoCoup;1099668I do but not to an obvious asshole. If you had asked in a different manner then perhaps I do.

Quote from: TooBoCoup;1099669Clearly you care very much or you wouldnt spend so much time and butt hurt trying to report me to the hall monitor, ban me, outclass me, projecting your own obvious shortcomings on me, etc. i know the truth hurts which is why you have such an outsized reaction compared to the other alt right ladies here.

Quote from: TooBoCoup;1099670This^

To the right of the 'reply with quote' button there is another button that looks like a quote with the plus sign (+).  This is 'multi-quote'.  You can click on multiple responses that you wish you respond to and they'll all be included in your response.  Each time you select one, a check will appear next to the post.  When you've selected all of the ones you wish to respond to, you can click 'reply with quote' and they'll all appear in your response (as yours do here).
When I say objectively, I mean \'subjectively\'.  When I say literally, I mean \'figuratively\'.  
And when I say that you are a horse\'s ass, I mean that the objective truth is that you are a literal horse\'s ass.

There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all. - Peter Drucker

deadDMwalking

Quote from: Doc Sammy;1099672Grown-ups are trying to have an actual conversation here. If you want to fantasize about being a professor while masturbating to pictures of Brie Larson, do it in your bedroom.

And for God's sake, close the goddamn door!

I thought you were going to avoid taking the bait?  Restating someone's position as a direct quote (ie, fap fap fap fap) is uncalled for and beneath even you.

(Sorry for the double post; Doc Sammy responded while I was writing my other response).
When I say objectively, I mean \'subjectively\'.  When I say literally, I mean \'figuratively\'.  
And when I say that you are a horse\'s ass, I mean that the objective truth is that you are a literal horse\'s ass.

There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all. - Peter Drucker

Mordred Pendragon

Quote from: deadDMwalking;1099676I thought you were going to avoid taking the bait?  Restating someone's position as a direct quote (ie, fap fap fap fap) is uncalled for and beneath even you.

(Sorry for the double post; Doc Sammy responded while I was writing my other response).

Hey, at this point I think we should take the bait and fight fire with fire.

It's obvious by now he has no interest in being an actual productive poster on this forum. If he's gonna try to post his low quality bait, I say let's have fun with it and fuck with him back.

Either he will get frustrated and fuck off, or Pundit will step in and lock this now irrelevant and meaningless thread

If there was a possibility he may have had interest in being an actual forum member, I would have slacked off for good earlier.
Sic Semper Tyrannis