This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Game art: What do you want?

Started by Dominus Nox, September 06, 2006, 04:04:45 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Dominus Nox

Ok, here's a thread that can't possibly go volatile. :footinmouth:

What do want when it comes to art in your game books?

As a long time OG, I actually like B&W art on flat paper. I think that B&W art actually is appropriate to game books as the idea of gaming is that the game designer/publisher hands you the basics, you color it in with your own stories and ideas. B&W art seems so natural for gaming material, it was about the only art we had back when i got into gaming, and it worked.

I also like 'art' that serves a purpose, like illustrating devices, races and so forth. This is very useful in cases where an unusual piece of gear is being described.

Color art is Ok for covers, of course, but I don't need or want it for internal art.

I want art that is functional, helping me visualize some of the more esoteric elements of a game. Beauty is Ok as a secondary feature, but generally I think the gamers should add the 'color' to the game themselves.

many game books are going to slick paper, color art and high prices, like GURPS did in 4e. Some still remain with B&W art on flat paper, like battlelords of the 23rd century.

Color, B&W, functional or decorative, what do you want from game book art?
RPGPundit is a fucking fascist asshole and a hypocritial megadouche.

S. John Ross

Quote from: Dominus NoxWhat do want when it comes to art in your game books?

Art that conveys the character and tone of the game. Art that highlights distinctive things about the setting (if your world has Regular Dwarves and special "Ice Dwarves" with beards and eyebrows of living frost and translucent white skin that shows the veins, I'd rather see the latter illustrated if it comes down to a budget-choice, since I've already got pictures of the former).

I like art that serves, rather than distracts from, the text. Even very good art can distract, if the style is jarring or the graphic designer has overplayed the flash.

And of course, I want naked or nearly-naked elf chicks, regardless of setting or genre.
S. John Ross
"The GM is not God ... God is one of my little NPCs."
//www.cumberlandgames.com

T-Willard

I want art that fits the setting/genre of the game.

If you want to blow $2000 on a cool picture of a woman getting anally plundered by a red dragon, more power too you.

If you want to use Stick Figure Death in your book, as long as it fits, I'll deal with it.

I'm a grownup. I don't need pictures in a book to understand it.
I am becoming more and more hollow, and am not sure how much of the man I was remains.

Abyssal Maw

No black ink silhouettes.
No clip art.
Download Secret Santicore! (10MB). I painted the cover :)

Mr. Analytical

Stuff that is evocative of the mood of the game.

Take Runequest for example.  The old editions had characters that looked like Greek warriors and that added to the idea that the game was less about medievel fantasy and more about Bronze age fantasy.  Compare that to the art in the Mongoose edition and not only is it extremely ugly but it's all bog standard fantasy artwork.

One of Exalted's only redeeming features in my eyes is the art work, which does a fantastic job setting the tone and the feel of the game.  This is despite the fact that the prose frequently lets the game down.

Also everyone has loads of body piercings so that makes it more realistic.

Dr Rotwang!

Vibrancy and life.  Spirit.  Inspiration.  Technical competence helps, but evocative work will trump.  

It can be epic or it can be subtle, as long as it presses the "Wow!" button.  Remember the illo in Mage 1st Ed. of the 4-dimensional beasties that looked like living creatures of jagged stone with pieces missing between the elbow and forearm?  

There you go.
Dr Rotwang!
...never blogs faster than he can see.
FONZITUDE RATING: 1985
[/font]

Balbinus

Quote from: Mr. AnalyticalStuff that is evocative of the mood of the game.

Take Runequest for example.  The old editions had characters that looked like Greek warriors and that added to the idea that the game was less about medievel fantasy and more about Bronze age fantasy.  Compare that to the art in the Mongoose edition and not only is it extremely ugly but it's all bog standard fantasy artwork.


I think that the old Runequest has an ancient world vibe precisely because of the art, the actual rules are not that ancient world and include stuff like Arbalests, but the art got it right.

Similarly, the art in Delta Green looked like desperate government guys fighting terrible things.  Very evocative.

So, the art should evoke the setting, show me what weird stuff looks like, reflect the setting and I'll come back to that and actually be competent and not done by your mate's younger brother.

On reflecting the setting, The Riddle of Steel has a gameworld in which non-humans are vanishingly rare.  Almost all the art is elves in chainmail, it's not particularly great art anyway but it really doesn't help that the art reflects something actually quite different to the game world.  Worst of all though is the Christopher Shy artwork for Spacecraft of the Solar System for THS, in which he draws a bunch of spaceships that don't exist in the setting and doesn't draw a single one that does.  Fuckwitted is too kind, the book's art not only doesn't support the game, it actually undermines it.

The Yann Waters

Quote from: Dr Rotwang!It can be epic or it can be subtle, as long as it presses the "Wow!" button.  Remember the illo in Mage 1st Ed. of the 4-dimensional beasties that looked like living creatures of jagged stone with pieces missing between the elbow and forearm?
Or the "drowning in the ceiling" illustration on page ten of the second edition. Actually explaining what's going on in there in terms of the game would take a bit of effort, but it manages to get the mood just right.
Previously known by the name of "GrimGent".

Mcrow

as far as art goes, I'm not real picky.
My rules:

#1: All races in the game should have atleast one piece of art showing what they look like.

#2: Art should complement the feel of the games setting.

#3: Color is nice, but not needed


I like to look @ art, but for me I'm buying the game mostly for the setting and rules.

Vellorian

I want art that is evocative and shows me what I can do in the world.  I prefer b&w line drawings.  I despise avante-garde "smears" of color.  I want to see cool characters doing cool things with cool equipment against cool enemies set in a cool backdrop just oozing with cool.

Did I mention I want it to be cool? :D

Cover art should be in color.  

I'd rather that the company pay the artists, writers and other contributors more and put less color in the interior.  Color costs too much to print.  I'd rather that money was better spent on the creative talent.

A color cover is nice, as long as it doesn't feature a group of adventurers posed for the picture.  I lean toward the iconic for cover art.  I don't like "busy" covers.

I also like the actual use of color, instead of a vaguely dark, dreary, black cover with vibrant red letters.  As much as I despise Exalted, it has a very striking cover that definitely stands out in the sea of black.

There should be a picture on nearly every flip of the page.  Equipment should be illustrated profusely.  Anything specifically astounding should be illustrated and featured in the background of many different pictures.  (If playing Ringworld, I would expect to see the "Fist of God" mountain in the background of several images in the book as well as detailed in its own right.)

If the book uses a "journal" style of conveying information, it's even acceptable to have sketches and draft artwork throughout.  Otherwise, however, go for completed and finished works.

As for style, I like many different styles of artwork in the same book.  I despise the books that have a single style, though I think the styles should be compilimentary.  Having something anime next to something more realitistic just won't cut it.  In fact, any style that is so definitive (like anime) should probably be excluded, unless it is the sole or overriding style for the book.

Wow.  I had no idea I was so particular!
Ian Vellore
"Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" -- Patrick Henry

S. John Ross

Quote from: Abyssal MawNo black ink silhouettes.

Oh, man, I love silhouettes :) They feel so Chaosium to me, and I love things that feel Chaosium (especially old-school Chaosium). I keep meaning to do a design that uses them prominently. Maybe FFE, dunno. Someday.
S. John Ross
"The GM is not God ... God is one of my little NPCs."
//www.cumberlandgames.com

S. John Ross

Quote from: VellorianIf the book uses a "journal" style of conveying information, it's even acceptable to have sketches and draft artwork throughout.

Again, it's fascinating how things I love can be things other people want to see avoided. In Uresia2, I'm going with all sketches for warmth ... and to echo the "refusal to commit to the facts" philosophy of the setting. I've already rejected one piece for coming in "too finished."
S. John Ross
"The GM is not God ... God is one of my little NPCs."
//www.cumberlandgames.com

flyingmice

I don't particularly care about game illustrations, so long as they illustrate what the world is like!

Mr. Shy I'm looking at you! :O

Stick figures are cool with me - yes, I love Risus - so long as they illustrate.

-mice
clash bowley * Flying Mice Games - an Imprint of Better Mousetrap Games
Flying Mice home page: http://jalan.flyingmice.com/flyingmice.html
Currently Designing: StarCluster 4 - Wavefront Empire
Last Releases: SC4 - Dark Orbital, SC4 - Out of the Ruins,  SC4 - Sabre & World
Blog: I FLY BY NIGHT

Caesar Slaad

I really don't want to see any more public domain woodcuts. Really. None.

Some of the "cheap reusable art" that seems to be getting around in the PDF trade is an alright way for small publishers to get decent art on the cheap, but I think it needs to be refreshed. The third or fourth time I see the same picture reused will get a bit tired.
The Secret Volcano Base: my intermittently updated RPG blog.

Running: Pathfinder Scarred Lands, Mutants & Masterminds, Masks, Starfinder, Bulldogs!
Playing: Sigh. Nothing.
Planning: Some Cyberpunk thing, system TBD.

John Morrow

Quote from: Dominus NoxWhat do want when it comes to art in your game books?

I like art that depicts what look like typical characters doing what look like typical things you might see happening in an adventure (not necessarily combat, either).  I like art that depicts typical setting scenes.  Staged shot artwork is fine for things like a single piece of art depicting all of the races in the setting side-by-side (like D&D 3.5 does).  I prefer realistic art over more abstract art like a lot of the stuff in Tribe 8, which I generally don't like.  I prefer art that's tasteful and not embarassing to read in public (Does every Mongoose Conan RPG book really need a topless woman on every other page?).  I don't like scenes of people gleefully killing other people in horrible ways (e.g., the original D6 System book).  

Quote from: Dominus NoxColor, B&W, functional or decorative, what do you want from game book art?

Color or B&W line drawings designed to be printed in B&W (not grayscale versions of color art, which almost always looks awful).  Functional, though decorative borders can be OK so long as they don't take up too much of the page.  After the Secret of Zir'An fiasco, I'm tempted to say no art behind the text, but will simply say that if you put any art behind the text, it should be incredibly light, should never use metallic inks, and should never include anything that looks like letters or writing.
Robin Laws\' Game Styles Quiz Results:
Method Actor 100%, Butt-Kicker 75%, Tactician 42%, Storyteller 33%, Power Gamer 33%, Casual Gamer 33%, Specialist 17%