This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

[D&D Next playtest #3] Multi-classing gone?

Started by Sacrosanct, September 08, 2012, 10:48:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

beejazz

Quote from: Bloody Stupid Johnson;583164I have misgivings about this.
 
While front-loading can be a problem with 3E type multiclassing, I think splitting your second classes' basic abilities across several levels is something that's dangerous because unless they're very careful, they'll wind up creating a setup where certain classes can only be multiclassed in a particular order - like how in 3.5 the Fighter1/Rogue1 who started as a fighter got a quarter of the skill points of the Rogue1/Fighter1 who started as a rogue. The idea could work, but only if its not possible to pick up the key ability of a second class by multiclassing straight into it, and not impossible to get some key features as a secondary class.

I really really would have preferred the themes/backgrounds method, and the themes/backgrounds broken down into (optional) featlike chunks to handle dabbling for groups that want it.

Also I'm really wondering how 3x multiclassing would interact with themes/backgrounds. I'm assuming those stay the same no matter what class you dip into?