This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Explain Hackmaster to me

Started by Settembrini, September 05, 2006, 07:07:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

ColonelHardisson

HackMaster is basically 1e AD&D with some of the best or most popular aspects of 2e, with a number of new systems integrated into it. Most notable among these new systems is the critical hit system, which uses a d10,000 (!), the Honor system, which could be used in other iterations of D&D, and the "kicker," which is an extra 20 hit points every creature gets (except for, as I recall, small creatures, which get 10).

I like the Fraim Brothers' artwork, a lot. To me, they define the look of HackMaster.

HackMaster is a parody and satire of D&D and its players circa the heyday of AD&D - the early to mid 1980s. This grew from the Knights of the Dinner Table comic, created by Jolly Blackburn. The KotDT comic can take a while to warm up to, given the crudity of the artwork. I know I hated it for a long time, but after the RPG was released, it gave me a new appreciation for the comic, and I love it now. It's often brilliantly written, and I find it spot-on in its depiction of how gamers can be (maybe exaggerated...a little bit).

The game is complex. Armor has hit points, characters will be perpetually scrambling to get the money to pay for training so they can go up in level, the splat books are considered official additions to the game, etc. If all the rules were used as written, the game would come close to collapsing under its own weight. But there seems to be a fanbase for the game which insists it plays the game as written, and I don't doubt that's true.

The HackMaster GameMaster Shield is, without a doubt, the largest, most comprehensive DM screen ever made for a RPG. It's very impressive, and has artwork that parodies that of the classic 1e DM screen. There is also a combat wheel for HM that can be used to speed up combat. I love HackMaster's accessories.

The modules are, except for 2, "hacked" versions of 1e classics. They've been injected with humor and wackiness, but I don't feel it's too overbearing. Some feel the opposite, though.

The Hacklopedias number eight or nine. I bought them back when they were released, one a month for $20/month, so it wasn't that expensive for me. There is a "Field Manual" which is a one-volume monster book that gathers many of the "staple" monsters together for those who don't want to buy the whole set. Some complained that many of the monsters in the Field Manual were modified per the Monster Matrix, which is something like a book of templates for HackMaster monsters. I don't feel it really hurts the book, but many complained. One could simply take the old Monster Manuals and add the "kicker" to each monster and use them as-is for HackMaster.

By the way, I love the writing style of the Players Handbook and GameMasters Guide, which retain much of Gygax's original writing, and expands upon it in his style. The books are genuinely fun to read.
"Illegitimis non carborundum." - General Joseph "Vinegar Joe" Stilwell

4e definitely has an Old School feel. If you disagree, cool. I won\'t throw any hyperbole out to prove the point.

cnath.rm

Quote from: ColonelHardissonThe HackMaster GameMaster Shield is, without a doubt, the largest, most comprehensive DM screen ever made for a RPG. It's very impressive, and has artwork that parodies that of the classic 1e DM screen. There is also a combat wheel for HM that can be used to speed up combat. I love HackMaster's accessories.
They made a  version of the screen for D&D as well, and it is just amazing. You have to check it out to understand how cool it is. One of the only (if not the only) screens that was actually worth the $19.99 list price. http://www.kenzerco.com/Orpg/kalamar/dmstour/dmstour01.php

Any idea how hard the honor system would be to port to regular 3rd ed play offhand Colonel?
"Dr.Who and CoC are, on the level of what the characters in it do, unbelievably freaking similar. The main difference is that in Dr. Who, Nyarlathotep is on your side, in the form of the Doctor."
-RPGPundit, discovering how BRP could be perfect for a DR Who campaign.

Take care Nothingland. You were always one of the most ridiculously good-looking sites on the internets, and the web too. I\'ll miss you.  -"Derek Zoolander MD" at a site long gone.

ColonelHardisson

Quote from: cnath.rmThey made a  version of the screen for D&D as well, and it is just amazing. You have to check it out to understand how cool it is. One of the only (if not the only) screens that was actually worth the $19.99 list price. http://www.kenzerco.com/Orpg/kalamar/dmstour/dmstour01.php

Any idea how hard the honor system would be to port to regular 3rd ed play offhand Colonel?

I haven't looked at it lately, but I don't think it'd be all that tough at all to port to 3e.

The D&D version of that screen is nifty, true, but it's smaller, contains Kalamar-specific maps, and has some really crappy artwork.
"Illegitimis non carborundum." - General Joseph "Vinegar Joe" Stilwell

4e definitely has an Old School feel. If you disagree, cool. I won\'t throw any hyperbole out to prove the point.

cnath.rm

Quote from: ColonelHardissonI haven't looked at it lately, but I don't think it'd be all that tough at all to port to 3e.

The D&D version of that screen is nifty, true, but it's smaller, contains Kalamar-specific maps, and has some really crappy artwork.
I'll agree with all of that, (particularly about the artwork) but still think it's a better value for the money then the ones that WotC put out. (aside from the one that came free with Dungeon or Dragon, can't remember which it was)
"Dr.Who and CoC are, on the level of what the characters in it do, unbelievably freaking similar. The main difference is that in Dr. Who, Nyarlathotep is on your side, in the form of the Doctor."
-RPGPundit, discovering how BRP could be perfect for a DR Who campaign.

Take care Nothingland. You were always one of the most ridiculously good-looking sites on the internets, and the web too. I\'ll miss you.  -"Derek Zoolander MD" at a site long gone.