This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

do rpgs still have some thing to learn from war games ?????

Started by kosmos1214, April 24, 2016, 12:38:22 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

daniel_ream

Quote from: Doom;896931I'm inclined to agree: tooooooo  many systems.

I think it would be more accurate to say we have too many iterations of the same handful of basic ideas.
D&D is becoming Self-Referential.  It is no longer Setting Referential, where it takes references outside of itself. It is becoming like Ouroboros in its self-gleaning for tropes, no longer attached, let alone needing outside context.
~ Opaopajr

Ravenswing

Quote from: hedgehobbit;895845I've noticed that wargamer and wargame designers are far more open to new and interesting mechanics than RPGers.
Depends on your outlook.  I'd suggest that they were far more prone to inventing new and bizarre mechanics because nothing new or bizarre had been bolted on to the system in a while.
This was a cool site, until it became an echo chamber for whiners screeching about how the "Evul SJWs are TAKING OVAH!!!" every time any RPG book included a non-"traditional" NPC or concept, or their MAGA peeners got in a twist. You're in luck, drama queens: the Taliban is hiring.