This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

D&D: Have you used the Duskblade from the PHB II?

Started by hgjs, August 30, 2006, 11:55:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

hgjs

So I've skimmed the PBH II, and I like the idea of the Duskblade: a fighter/wizard who is viable from level 1.  The problem (from my perspective) is, at first reading the Duskblade seems to emphasize "fighter" far more than "wizard."  My question is, to anyone who's played in a game with a Duskblade or just given this more thought than I have, how "wizard-y" does the Duskblade feel in play?  Also, is the class able to carry its weight in a party, or is it underpowered?  Any other general comments would also be appreciated.
 

Mechnomancer

It's great at low levels, but you'll wish you had better spells later in the game.
 

Zachary The First

Quote from: MechnomancerIt's great at low levels, but you'll wish you had better spells later in the game.

So it still suffers from the old syndrome of a fighter losing the power battle to casters at higher level?s  Would he be any closer to closing the gap between wizard and fighter, say, at Level 20?
RPG Blog 2

Currently Prepping: Castles & Crusades
Currently Reading/Brainstorming: Mythras
Currently Revisiting: Napoleonic/Age of Sail in Space