This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

But at What Cost

Started by PencilBoy99, March 20, 2025, 04:04:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

PencilBoy99

March 20, 2025, 04:04:38 PM
Really interesting essay. I think the author likes these clock mechanisms but I still found this quote delightful

A recurring joke of the event, based on a plurality of entries, was "you will win... but at what cost?" So many of the entries were meant to evoke a sense of loss over fictional things your character, and ideally the player, care about. It's how lots of heroic fiction plays out, yeah? The hero always wins, and the audience appreciates their heroism more because of all they gave up along the way.

The desire to model this well-trod fictional arc has resulted in an entire generation of "you will win but at what cost?" games. New games where you don't know if you even can win are in short supply these days. And if "you will succeed" isn't baked right into the system (like Inevitable almost is), it shows up in lots of GMing. Because losing makes players sad, I guess? It's not "how fiction works?"
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions