Quote from: I run with scissors;583461I have never used the words "cock" "dick" or "cunt."


IRWS

ORLY?

Quote from: youI mean, for fuck sake, we should be only more than happy to fund these "creative" cut and paste scam artists circle jerk of dick measuring.

Quote from: Sacrosanct;583466ORLY?

Ok, I was wrong. I did not realize I used the word dick.

Way to go, you really got me.

Asshat.

IRWS

Quote from: I run with scissors;583465As for making things clear for me, there is no need to. I understand what you are saying, I am just sadden that you and others of your ilk rather be angry at the messenger than the message.

IRWS

:banghead:


Jesus, you just don't get it, do you?  The whole point of what me and Mistwell have been saying is that people in general will not focus on your message, no matter how valid it might be, when you're acting like a 12 year old who just discovered how to swear.  This is totally on you and how you choose to behave, not on everyone else.

Wow.

Quote from: Sacrosanct;583468:banghead:


Jesus, you just don't get it, do you?  The whole point of what me and Mistwell have been saying is that people in general will not focus on your message, no matter how valid it might be, when you're acting like a 12 year old who just discovered how to swear.  This is totally on you and how you choose to behave, not on everyone else.

Wow.

Hasn't the continued dialog about this issue (not the discussion about the discussion, but the actual subject of the project delays and communication) proven that you're wrong about that?

Quote from: Sacrosanct;583468:banghead:


Jesus, you just don't get it, do you?  The whole point of what me and Mistwell have been saying is that people in general will not focus on your message, no matter how valid it might be, when you're acting like a 12 year old who just discovered how to swear.  This is totally on you and how you choose to behave, not on everyone else.

Wow.

Wow, I get it.

What I do not get is why you cannot answer any questions direct at you, or why you cannot discuss the issue at hand, instead of focusing on minutia of how one person chooses to post.

I mean, hell, even when I do not use naught words, and try to engage you in a real discussion, you still result in posting animated emoticons, and calling me names.

It is obvious, you would rather engage in this attack, and not answer real questions.

Its cool. A bit dishonest, but hey, I will not stop you.

IRWS

Quote from: kythri;583469Hasn't the continued dialog about this issue (not the discussion about the discussion, but the actual subject of the project delays and communication) proven that you're wrong about that?

Looking at the posts in this thread and how it started, I'd say that discussion happened in spite of IRWS, not because of him.

Quote from: I run with scissors;583471Wow, I get it.

What I do not get is why you cannot answer any questions direct at you, or why you cannot discuss the issue at hand, instead of focusing on minutia of how one person chooses to post.

I mean, hell, even when I do not use naught words, and try to engage you in a real discussion, you still result in posting animated emoticons, and calling me names.

It is obvious, you would rather engage in this attack, and not answer real questions.

Its cool. A bit dishonest, but hey, I will not stop you.

IRWS

What questions?  I already said I don't care about this Dwimmermount because I'm not involved.  What questions do you want me to answer?

Quote from: Sacrosanct;583472Looking at the posts in this thread and how it started, I'd say that discussion happened in spite of IRWS, not because of him.

I am done with talking to you. You are dishonest.

IRWS

:rolleyes:

"Y U no answer my questions?"

"What questions?"

"I'm done talking to you."

Quote from: Sacrosanct;583473What questions?  I already said I don't care about this Dwimmermount because I'm not involved.  What questions do you want me to answer?

Questions have been asked, and you still choose to focuse on me.

Ok:

1. What do you think about a publisher who bullies a person who gives them a bad review (http://www.boardgamegeek.com/thread/624137/the-assholes-have-won-goodbye-bgg)

2. Is Jim a scam artist?

IRWS

Quote from: I run with scissors;583476Questions have been asked, and you still choose to focuse on me.

Ok:

1. What do you think about a publisher who bullies a person who gives them a bad review (http://www.boardgamegeek.com/thread/624137/the-assholes-have-won-goodbye-bgg)

Any form of cyber harassment is pretty pathetic.

Quote2. Is Jim a scam artist?

IRWS

I don't care.  I don't know him, and am not associated with him.

Quote from: Sacrosanct;583468:banghead:


Jesus, you just don't get it, do you?  The whole point of what me and Mistwell have been saying is that people in general will not focus on your message, no matter how valid it might be, when you're acting like a 12 year old who just discovered how to swear.  This is totally on you and how you choose to behave, not on everyone else.

Wow.

I wouldn't say that's true. I've read the whole thing, and enjoyed his summaries, complete with dates/links.

Rather, he may have gotten MORE attention by posting in such a flamboyant manner. It shows how angry he is.

If he had posted in a pedestrian manner, I may not have bothered. Can't read everything on the internet. Gotta vie for attention.

Good on IRWS for bringing this to the attention of the community.

I had been reading James' blog, but had no idea that this scandal was underfoot.

Quote from: Sacrosanct;583475:rolleyes:

"Y U no answer my questions?"

"What questions?"

"I'm done talking to you."

More like "Potty mouth bad."

"What about what my fucking points [edit: SAY] about the hobby?"

"Potty mouth bad."

YDIS has become as vain and egotistical as JMal and Zak S ever were. Satire, however foul, works when at its core there is honesty but ydis is a Liar. His nation of retards, his commenters, were always off kilter and off message which made the place funny because he would would make his point and a crowd of half-wits would arrive venting in a sort of pidgin cock-argot, never fully understanding what was going on.

I enjoyed mocking them until it felt like a game of whack-a-mole, humiliate one and a sock-puppet appears with full hit points. At some point though these lunatics, for whom thought, anger and faeces are the one concept, took over and ydis aligned himself with them for the FAME. So like I said he is no longer a satirist but an egotist and a Liar.

Quote from: _kent_;583504YDIS has become as vain and egotistical as JMal and Zak S ever were. Satire, however foul, works when at its core there is honesty but ydis is a Liar. His nation of retards, his commenters, were always off kilter and off message which made the place funny because he would would make his point and a crowd of half-wits would arrive venting in a sort of pidgin cock-argot, never fully understanding what was going on.

I enjoyed mocking them until it felt like a game of whack-a-mole, humiliate one and a sock-puppet appears with full hit points. At some point though these lunatics, for whom thought, anger and faeces are the one concept, took over and ydis aligned himself with them for the FAME. So like I said he is no longer a satirist but an egotist and a Liar.

You really are pissed no one reads your blog, aren't you?