This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Class creation rules in AD&D 2nd ed

Started by RunningLaser, February 24, 2014, 04:57:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

RunningLaser

February 24, 2014, 04:57:43 PM
Just ran across these the other day in the 2e DMG.  Anyone ever use them?  They seem really simple, which I like.

Silverlion

#1
February 24, 2014, 05:45:00 PM
Quote from: RunningLaser;732963Just ran across these the other day in the 2e DMG.  Anyone ever use them?  They seem really simple, which I like.

I've used them a few times. They were actually based on a Dragon Magazine article designed for class-making in BECMI D&D. Very very similar in fact. I used them to fashion a shapeshifter class. (Could mostly do animals, but also every few levels picked up a "powered" form.)
High Valor REVISED: A fantasy Dark Age RPG. Available NOW!
Hearts & Souls 2E Coming in 2019

Gabriel2

#2
February 24, 2014, 06:02:38 PM
I've used them.  They work.  Characters made with those rules tend to need more experience than they probably should require.  It's part of the trade-off for the flexibility.  The whole thing works well enough in a minimalistic way.

That said, I came to the personal conclusion that if I was messing with trying to create my own custom D&D classes, that I was better off playing another game with greater mechanical character customization.  YMMV.
 

Sacrosanct

#3
February 24, 2014, 06:23:44 PM
In both 1e and 2e, when I did custom character classes, I sort of just threw those guidelines away and created something that just felt right, from a balance standpoint.  If you're objective and don't let your biases get in the way ("My ninja class uses the fighter's THAC0, all the thief abilities, d12 for hp, and can cast spells!"), then it works just doing it on the fly.
D&D is not an "everyone gets a ribbon" game.  If you\'re stupid, your PC will die.  If you\'re an asshole, your PC will die (probably from the other PCs).  If you\'re unlucky, your PC may die.  Point?  PC\'s die.  Get over it and roll up a new one.

JeremyR

#4
February 24, 2014, 06:50:50 PM
I actually made a computer program that automated it. Visual Basic, so probably doesn't run on modern computers...

I've found doing it on the fly can produce really bad results. That's my main complaint with Blood & Treasure, the classes are really unbalanced because he just went by feel.

But really, by whatever method, the only way is playtesting...

Votan

#5
February 24, 2014, 07:20:43 PM
Definitely agree with the sentiment that these rules can work out poorly.  The same is true of the Player's Options character class customization rules.  They work fine for some purposes but you can end up in odd corners if you are not careful.

Exploderwizard

#6
February 24, 2014, 07:49:07 PM
To me they failed because the existing classes couldn't be created with them.
Quote from: JonWakeGamers, as a whole, are much like primitive cavemen when confronted with a new game. Rather than \'oh, neat, what\'s this do?\', the reaction is to decide if it\'s a sex hole, then hit it with a rock.

Quote from: Old Geezer;724252At some point it seems like D&D is going to disappear up its own ass.

Quote from: Kyle Aaron;766997In the randomness of the dice lies the seed for the great oak of creativity and fun. The great virtue of the dice is that they come without boxed text.

Warthur

#7
February 24, 2014, 07:50:53 PM
Quote from: Exploderwizard;732991To me they failed because the existing classes couldn't be created with them.
Why would you need to create the existing classes? You already have them.

Also I'm fairly sure you could create the existing classes, but at a premium in terms of XP/level, but I personally have no qualms about levying a special snowflake tax.
I am no longer posting here or reading this forum because Pundit has regularly claimed credit for keeping this community active. I am sick of his bullshit for reasons I explain here and I don\'t want to contribute to anything he considers to be a personal success on his part.

I recommend The RPG Pub as a friendly place where RPGs can be discussed and where the guiding principles of moderation are "be kind to each other" and "no politics". It\'s pretty chill so far.

David Johansen

#8
February 24, 2014, 08:07:54 PM
I actually designed a system based on it and used it to design the classes in Dark Passages.  It's one of the bits I've never really released or showed, that and the spell creation system.
Fantasy Adventure Comic, games, and more http://www.uncouthsavage.com

Angry_Douchebag

#9
February 24, 2014, 08:47:00 PM
It's been ages, but we actually played a campaign where everyone made their characters using that table.  I think the logic at the time was that everyone would face the same xp premium as everyone else.  If I remember correctly, it made spell caster progression quite costly.

Warthur

#10
February 24, 2014, 09:16:45 PM
Flippancy aside, I think the XP premium is useful because its a solid way to make players stop and really think about whether one of the established classes wouldn't meet their needs instead.
I am no longer posting here or reading this forum because Pundit has regularly claimed credit for keeping this community active. I am sick of his bullshit for reasons I explain here and I don\'t want to contribute to anything he considers to be a personal success on his part.

I recommend The RPG Pub as a friendly place where RPGs can be discussed and where the guiding principles of moderation are "be kind to each other" and "no politics". It\'s pretty chill so far.

Doughdee222

#11
February 24, 2014, 10:16:55 PM
Huh, interesting. I wasn't aware AD&D 2nd had such a section. I skipped over that edition as my friends and I had moved on to other games and we hadn't read much good about it anyway.

Makes me recall that back in the late 80's, back when the Internet was green text on a black screen, I used to post to an early game forum. One of my larger posts was designing a new AD&D class: Dune's Bene Gesserit as fantasy characters. Primarily meant to be an NPC class although it could be used for PCs too. They came out as a modified Monk class with a different set of level bonus advantages.

I've long wondered what happened to that old forum. Swallowed up by the electrons of time I guess.

Omega

#12
February 25, 2014, 02:37:45 AM
Quote from: Doughdee222;733009Huh, interesting. I wasn't aware AD&D 2nd had such a section. I skipped over that edition as my friends and I had moved on to other games and we hadn't read much good about it anyway.

Makes me recall that back in the late 80's, back when the Internet was green text on a black screen, I used to post to an early game forum. One of my larger posts was designing a new AD&D class: Dune's Bene Gesserit as fantasy characters. Primarily meant to be an NPC class although it could be used for PCs too. They came out as a modified Monk class with a different set of level bonus advantages.

I've long wondered what happened to that old forum. Swallowed up by the electrons of time I guess.

Its fun to play around with as long as you do not have a player who likes to game the system.

In the wrong hands it was possible to create some potentially broken custom classes. Wasnt easy. But could be done from personal experience. Ive heard others report players who created really broken customs somehow.

Used as it was intended though its fine.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions