This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Not bad for a bunch of wargamers

Started by Pseudoephedrine, August 05, 2008, 07:31:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Pseudoephedrine

http://www.motherjones.com/news/featurex/2008/07/military-advantage-in-history.pdf

The authors are a bunch of wargamers (who also happen to work for the US military). It was written for the US military as a report on how to maintain its great power status over the long run. Interesting on its own, and neat as an example of how one can use wargames IRL.
Running
The Pernicious Light, or The Wreckers of Sword Island;
A Goblin\'s Progress, or Of Cannons and Canons;
An Oration on the Dignity of Tash, or On the Elves and Their Lies
All for S&W Complete
Playing: Dark Heresy, WFRP 2e

"Elves don\'t want you cutting down trees but they sell wood items, they don\'t care about the forests, they\'\'re the fuckin\' wood mafia." -Anonymous

KenHR

Mark Herman has long been a consultant for the military.  His games are top-notch.  Empire of the Sun is a masterpiece of recent vintage.

Thanks for sharing this!
For fuck\'s sake, these are games, people.

And no one gives a fuck about your ignore list.


Gompan
band - other music

Narf the Mouse

...Why are most technical .pdfs hard to read, visually?
The main problem with government is the difficulty of pressing charges against its directors.

Given a choice of two out of three M&Ms, the human brain subconsciously tries to justify the two M&Ms chosen as being superior to the M&M not chosen.