Quote from: Svenhelgrim on July 11, 2023, 01:40:40 PM
I remember in the original Baldur's Gate game that beads were a real problem when you encountered them,

Oh My.

Quote from: Svenhelgrim on July 11, 2023, 01:40:40 PM
I remember in the original Baldur's Gate game that beads were a real problem when you encountered them, especially at low levels since they were not immediately hostile and would turn hostile at random, usually catching your party off guard.

Now it seems the game provides an alternative to combat for dealing with bears...

I think the artist who did the fucked up eye look for Dorian from Dragon Age Inquisition when he was going to bugger you is the same guy who did the same shit eating grin and fucked up "I'm gonna ream you boy" eyes on the bear are one in the same.  Creepy as fuck.  I wonder if there is a cut scene where mid thrust you can slit the bears throat for XP and bear pelt?  I swear the more shit WotC puts out the more they are making me think Chaotic Evil is a valid game style for cooperative game play now.

Quote from: Anon Adderlan on July 11, 2023, 02:41:30 PM

Quote from: Svenhelgrim on July 11, 2023, 01:40:40 PM
I remember in the original Baldur's Gate game that beads were a real problem when you encountered them,

Oh My.

Well on Taco Tuesday night in Faerun when Bhall pulls out those beads and throws them at you to fight, its a shitty fight.

I never thought I'd see the day when gay sex was so vanilla and boring you'd have to make one of the participants an animal just to make the Christians react.

And honestly, that's all this is. Regular old gay romance options don't make the religious people lose their shit anymore, so now everyone has to try harder to be edgy.

Quote from: Svenhelgrim on July 11, 2023, 01:40:40 PM
I remember in the original Baldur's Gate game that beads were a real problem when you encountered them

Given the content of this thread, this mis-type had me do a double take! 

I wonder how long it will take before they resort to making violent tentacle hentai the default standard for sex scenes in video games.

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on July 12, 2023, 04:41:09 PM
I wonder how long it will take before they resort to making violent tentacle hentai the default standard for sex scenes in video games.

Violent tentacle hentai with foxboys, ofc.

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on July 12, 2023, 04:41:09 PM
I wonder how long it will take before they resort to making violent tentacle hentai the default standard for sex scenes in video games.

Given the mind flayer theme, I would have been less surprised to see that. Anyway we've kind of passed that point. I would have thought most people considered depicting a character in flagrante with a real-world animal was considerably more degenerate than depicting one with a made up fantasy creature. Guess I overestimated the general public

The irony is that they probably would have gotten more heat if they had shown a female getting "surprised" by tentacles. Their target audience is so twisted up they'll defend anything as long as they can hold up the "consent" shield. Also, I'm pretty sure that making this a gay scene was a calculated choice. Most people these days are well conditioned to be less critical of sexual practices if its two (or more) men doing it.

I'm not really phased by tentacle sex anymore. It's pure fantasy. What I'm afraid of is the normalization of violent torture porn as "normal" sex, as is the case for current porn. Something like 50% of sexual encounters now involve the man asphyxiating the woman. https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/dec/08/sexual-choking-is-now-so-common-that-many-young-people-dont-think-it-even-requires-consent-thats-a-problem

Another thing about the clip is that it's not meant to be titillating. It's specifically making fun of the characters involved. You're supposed to point and laugh, not approve and endorse.

Quote from: BoxCrayonTales on July 12, 2023, 08:30:50 PM
What I'm afraid of is the normalization of violent torture porn as "normal" sex, as is the case for current porn. Something like 50% of sexual encounters now involve the man asphyxiating the woman. https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/dec/08/sexual-choking-is-now-so-common-that-many-young-people-dont-think-it-even-requires-consent-thats-a-problem

That's horrifying. However I can say from experience that this is a far more common kink than most realize, and sometimes asking for consent isn't even required as the woman will tell you outright.

Quote from: Anon Adderlan on July 12, 2023, 09:59:13 PM
Another thing about the clip is that it's not meant to be titillating. It's specifically making fun of the characters involved. You're supposed to point and laugh, not approve and endorse.

A: SJWs are notoroius prudes. They never accept "X is supposed to be a joke" as a reasonable explanation for a behaviour they dislike, ESPECIALLY for sexual content.
B: If this was a "thousand year old" person that looked like a ten year old (in dem anime style) this game would be banned or that scene would be removed. Well primarily if they where a girl. If it where a boy it might be risque and brave (or only a joke we swear).
C: SJWs often parade their fetishes/social desires as "jokes" until they can declare them as what they wanted.
D: Still not a great joke. "Its bestiality! Get it?" is a dull punchline. Same would be for necrophelia or pedophelia or whatever other phelia.

So yeah for all those reasons I press X to doubt.

The terminally humorless don't get to say "it's just a joke, bro."

Whether or not they get "just a joke" depends entirely on the perceived politics of the person making the joke.

Fuck it. Now I want to see Ocelot Kirk and furry Star Trek.

But Paramount is as woketarded as Disney, so I'll just watch old episodes of Pigs in Space.



Glad to see the D&D brand commit to more self-destruction.

Quote from: S'mon on July 12, 2023, 01:58:17 PM

Quote from: Svenhelgrim on July 11, 2023, 01:40:40 PM
I remember in the original Baldur's Gate game that beads were a real problem when you encountered them

Given the content of this thread, this mis-type had me do a double take! 

I came back to see my mistake, and the effect it had , and I decided not to correct it.

The perils of big thumbs and a small phone.