This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Handling offscreened PCs?

Started by mAcular Chaotic, September 26, 2017, 04:35:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Voros

I didn't say it was the majority, I said I was surprised to see anyone advocate it.

The Exploited.

Quote from: Voros;997682I didn't say it was the majority, I said I was surprised to see anyone advocate it.

Me too! It would be something that I'd never do... Unless the PC specifically wanted me to wack his character so he could start back with a new one (or something like that).
https://www.instagram.com/robnecronomicon/

\'Attack minded and dangerously so.\' - W. E. Fairbairn.

Bren

Quote from: Voros;997682I didn't say it was the majority, I said I was surprised to see anyone advocate it.
It's the internet. Someone is going to be in favor of anything. Literally anything. :D
Currently running: Runequest in Glorantha + Call of Cthulhu   Currently playing: D&D 5E + RQ
My Blog: For Honor...and Intrigue
I have a gold medal from Ravenswing and Gronan owes me bee

Gronan of Simmerya

Quote from: Bren;997713It's the internet. Someone is going to be in favor of anything. Literally anything. :D

And now there's porn about it.
You should go to GaryCon.  Period.

The rules can\'t cure stupid, and the rules can\'t cure asshole.

TJS

I'd negotiate something with the player.  The PC can be alive, but not without some kind of consequence.  Something bad happened in the escape from the jungle which can provide further plothooks.  Maybe the PC got bitten by a Were-jaguar and is now a Lycanthrope and needs to find a cure.  Or the PC survived but lost his faith due to some terrible things he saw and is now a fighter.  Or maybe they're just horribly scarred from a fight they barely got through.  I'd let the player ultimately decide but it would have to be something serious enough that survival doesn't feel like a cop-out.

Dumarest

Never negotiate with player! Do you see refs on the sidelines asking the ballplayer whether he thinks it was a foul?

Bren

Quote from: Dumarest;997944Never negotiate with player! Do you see refs on the sidelines asking the ballplayer whether he thinks it was a foul?
Sometime back in the last century I recall playing pickup basketball and football and people did in fact ask other players if something was or was not a foul.
Currently running: Runequest in Glorantha + Call of Cthulhu   Currently playing: D&D 5E + RQ
My Blog: For Honor...and Intrigue
I have a gold medal from Ravenswing and Gronan owes me bee

mAcular Chaotic

Quote from: Dumarest;997944Never negotiate with player! Do you see refs on the sidelines asking the ballplayer whether he thinks it was a foul?

But you need the player to buy-in to whatever you're doing. If you get their thoughts and they're OK with it, it gives you extra freedom to act.
Battle doesn\'t need a purpose; the battle is its own purpose. You don\'t ask why a plague spreads or a field burns. Don\'t ask why I fight.

Dumarest

Quote from: Bren;997946Sometime back in the last century I recall playing pickup basketball and football and people did in fact ask other players if something was or was not a foul.

People, not refs. Everyone knows refs aren't people.

Dumarest

Quote from: mAcular Chaotic;997948But you need the player to buy-in to whatever you're doing. If you get their thoughts and they're OK with it, it gives you extra freedom to act.

It's cool if the player is okay with it, but the ref doesn't need their agreement is all I'm saying. Besides, the best solution is still what I wrote way back on page one.

TJS

Exactly.  It's just basic people handling skills.

DM: Ok.  I'll say you're PC survived but his face now is horribly scarred from being mauled by a Jaguar.  Small children scream and run away when they see him coming.
Player: What?  Fuck you!

Or

DM: DM: Ok. I'll say you're PC survived but the other character's went through hell and really your character shouldn't have survived.  There's needs to be some consequence to show how tough it was.  How do you feel about your character being horribly scarred after a fight with a Jaguar?
Player:  Cool.  That makes him more badass.
DM: There's be some penalties in social situations.
Player: That's fine.  Hey, does that mean mean I'll get a bonus to intimidate people.
DM: Sure, seems logical.

TJS


TJS

Exactly, the best way to screw over the PC is to get the player to agree to it.  Or better yet come up with it.

Dumarest

Quote from: TJS;997985Exactly, the best way to screw over the PC is to get the player to agree to it.  Or better yet come up with it.

Okay, that I will agree to. Well done. Truly, players are the best at screwing their PCs.

Gronan of Simmerya

"I will not kill your character, I will sit here and laugh hysterically as your own stupidity kills your character."
You should go to GaryCon.  Period.

The rules can\'t cure stupid, and the rules can\'t cure asshole.