This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Big Sword small Hallway.

Started by Headless, August 25, 2017, 08:01:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

DavetheLost

To avoid confusion my games now use the following "official" definitions of swords:

Short Sword: It's kind of short, but really too long to be a dagger.

Long Sword: It's longer than a short sword.

Broadsword: A sword used by women.

Greatsword: A really, really good sword.

Philotomy Jurament

The problem is not that power corrupts, but that the corruptible are irresistibly drawn to the pursuit of power. Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.

Armchair Gamer

Quote from: Philotomy Jurament;991304Just to avoid potential confusion, it's worth noting that when Easton talks about "longswords" he's not talking about what is called a "longsword" in (A)D&D. When he talks about "longswords" or "bastard swords" the (A)D&D equivalent would be the (A)D&D bastard sword. When he talks about "arming swords" the (A)D&D equivalent would be the (A)D&D longsword.

It's things like this that make you think Basic D&D was on the right track with 'short/normal/two-handed' swords. :)

Philotomy Jurament

For the level of abstraction in most D&D games, I think broad categories like that are fine.

If a DM wants some additional detail, it's available for those interested in such things. (And different editions of D&D have various rules that can be used with that kind of detail, if desired.) You just have to be aware that real-world sword nomenclature isn't consistent or precise, and the common terminology that's used, today, doesn't always line up with the terminology used in the game rules. I happen to be interested in stuff like this, so I enjoy looking into the details and figuring out what kind of historical weapons best fit certain D&D weapons, but it certainly isn't necessary or something for everyone.
The problem is not that power corrupts, but that the corruptible are irresistibly drawn to the pursuit of power. Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.

Bren

Quote from: Philotomy Jurament;991330You just have to be aware that real-world sword nomenclature isn't consistent or precise, and the common terminology that's used, today, doesn't always line up with the terminology used in the game rules.
And the current expert nomenclature doesn't match up with the nomenclature from a different decade or century or expert. Nor does it match all that well with the terminology used by the people from the time periods where those weapons originated or were used in deadly earnest. And that's not even considering that what information we do have of original nomenclature comes from a limited number of literary sources. That number is extremely limited if we look at the period prior to the widespread adoption of printing and moveable type.
Currently running: Runequest in Glorantha + Call of Cthulhu   Currently playing: D&D 5E + RQ
My Blog: For Honor...and Intrigue
I have a gold medal from Ravenswing and Gronan owes me bee

Philotomy Jurament

Quote from: Bren;991354And the current expert nomenclature doesn't match up with the nomenclature from a different decade or century or expert. Nor does it match all that well with the terminology used by the people from the time periods where those weapons originated or were used in deadly earnest. And that's not even considering that what information we do have of original nomenclature comes from a limited number of literary sources. That number is extremely limited if we look at the period prior to the widespread adoption of printing and moveable type.

Yep. It's all over the place.
The problem is not that power corrupts, but that the corruptible are irresistibly drawn to the pursuit of power. Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.

crkrueger

Quote from: Voros;991155As if you can't see the humour in the dead earnest Wikiexpert talk here Kruger.

Granted, it's hard to take seriously any definition of medieval swords that doesn't refer to Ewart Oakeshott's Typologies, based on actual form.
Even the the "cutting edge" storygamers for all their talk of narrative, plot, and drama are fucking obsessed with the god damned rules they use. - Estar

Yes, Sean Connery\'s thumb does indeed do megadamage. - Spinachcat

Isuldur is a badass because he stopped Sauron with a broken sword, but Iluvatar is the badass because he stopped Sauron with a hobbit. -Malleus Arianorum

"Tangency Edition" D&D would have no classes or races, but 17 genders to choose from. -TristramEvans

Headless

Oh man.  Nerd penis and swords.  I almost forgot.  COLD STEEL

https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DI0S3cjd-emk&ved=0ahUKEwiTy4nlvpzWAhUE7yYKHe9LCX8QtwIIMzAC&usg=AFQjCNH3TKehxc3gjeqa8xoCr-e2ybWHew

I fucking love this guy.  "No one will mess with you if you open the door with 5 feet of steel in your hand, no matter how small your penis is."   I can't remember which vid that was in they are all awesome.

Philotomy Jurament

Quote from: CRKrueger;991374Granted, it's hard to take seriously any definition of medieval swords that doesn't refer to Ewart Oakeshott's Typologies, based on actual form.
Between Oakeshott and the HEMA guys, there seems to be a kind of consensus in some circles, but it isn't really that widespread, from what I can tell.
The problem is not that power corrupts, but that the corruptible are irresistibly drawn to the pursuit of power. Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.

RPGPundit

I'm not a military historian, but from what I researched, the gigantic swords were not really in use in War of the Roses-era England. There were two-handed swords, but not of the obscene lengths that would be found later.  A term apparently used by weapons historians in reference to it were "hand-and-a-half" swords.
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you\'ve played \'medieval fantasy\' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

S'mon

Quote from: Headless;991383Oh man.  Nerd penis and swords.  I almost forgot.  COLD STEEL

https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DI0S3cjd-emk&ved=0ahUKEwiTy4nlvpzWAhUE7yYKHe9LCX8QtwIIMzAC&usg=AFQjCNH3TKehxc3gjeqa8xoCr-e2ybWHew

I fucking love this guy.  "No one will mess with you if you open the door with 5 feet of steel in your hand, no matter how small your penis is."   I can't remember which vid that was in they are all awesome.

Massive Zweihander hilt on a moderate sized longsword blade? That's a weird sword.

DavetheLost

Quote from: Headless;991383I fucking love this guy.  "No one will mess with you if you open the door with 5 feet of steel in your hand, no matter how small your penis is."   I can't remember which vid that was in they are all awesome.

Unless it's a small door in a low ceilinged room...or worse, a narrow hallway.  But it is a great quote.