This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

rpg.net forums down

Started by kregmosier, February 01, 2007, 01:16:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

JamesV

Quote from: James McMurrayAnything actually RPG related?

To be honest, while the name on the forum has the letters 'R', 'P', and even 'G' the proper sequence on it, it's maybe half about them anymore. The other half is completely generic, idle chitchat.
Running: Dogs of WAR - Beer & Pretzels & Bullets
Planning to Run: Godbound or Stars Without Number
Playing: Star Wars D20 Rev.

A lack of moderation doesn\'t mean saying every asshole thing that pops into your head.

Ian Absentia

Quote from: BalbinusThat's the issue.  Guys like Mr A getting tempbanned for saying that reading Dr'lizzt novels or however you spell it is a waste of your life.  That got him banned for a bit for a group attack on readers of those novels.
Or the fellow whose thread was locked by Darren because he accused people who illegally downloaded copyrighted material of being thieves and called them "scumbags".  Darren actually had the temerity to defend his decision as a group attack against thieves.  Of course, in reality, he just didn't like the combative tone the fellow was using, but he fell back on "group attack against thieves" for justification.

!i!

James McMurray

Cool, I'd prefer to actually test the waters on RPg stuff if possible. Tangency doesn't really do it for me, I'd rather run the risk of accidentally learning something from my fellow posters about games. :)

fonkaygarry

Without tangency an entire generation of self-aggrandizing shutins would be unable to talk about what they had for breakfast!  There would be no way for frustrated geeks to set up experimental gay sex in the bathrooms at GenCon!

It would be tragedy of the highest order.
teamchimp: I'm doing problem sets concerning inbreeding and effective population size.....I absolutely know this will get me the hot bitches.

My jiujitsu is no match for sharks, ninjas with uzis, and hot lava. Somehow I persist. -Fat Cat

"I do believe; help my unbelief!" -Mark 9:24

Zachary The First

Next GenCon, I am now officially holding it until I get home.
RPG Blog 2

Currently Prepping: Castles & Crusades
Currently Reading/Brainstorming: Mythras
Currently Revisiting: Napoleonic/Age of Sail in Space

fonkaygarry

Quote from: Zachary The FirstNext GenCon, I am now officially holding it until I get home.
:haw:
teamchimp: I'm doing problem sets concerning inbreeding and effective population size.....I absolutely know this will get me the hot bitches.

My jiujitsu is no match for sharks, ninjas with uzis, and hot lava. Somehow I persist. -Fat Cat

"I do believe; help my unbelief!" -Mark 9:24

Ian Absentia

Your jizz?  Good idea in general.  Not your other effluences, though.  Just choose your restrooms carefully, and watch your step. :)

!i!

Zachary The First

Quote from: Ian AbsentiaYour jizz?  Good idea in general.  Not your other effluences, though.  Just choose your restrooms carefully, and watch your step. :)

!i!
Sound advice, sir, sound advice indeed.

EDIT:  Fonkaygary, I hope that wasn't inspired by an actual RPGnet thread. :eek:
RPG Blog 2

Currently Prepping: Castles & Crusades
Currently Reading/Brainstorming: Mythras
Currently Revisiting: Napoleonic/Age of Sail in Space

Tom B

Quote from: JamesVTo be honest, while the name on the forum has the letters 'R', 'P', and even 'G' the proper sequence on it, it's maybe half about them anymore. The other half is completely generic, idle chitchat.
True...but that half is still very substantial and still out-traffics most pure RPG websites.
Tom B.

-----------------------------------------------
"All that we say or seem is but a dream within a dream." -Edgar Allen Poe

fonkaygarry

Quote from: Zachary The FirstFonkaygary, I hope that wasn't inspired by an actual RPGnet thread. :eek:
Not a big purple thread, no.
teamchimp: I'm doing problem sets concerning inbreeding and effective population size.....I absolutely know this will get me the hot bitches.

My jiujitsu is no match for sharks, ninjas with uzis, and hot lava. Somehow I persist. -Fat Cat

"I do believe; help my unbelief!" -Mark 9:24

arminius

Since someone was looking for an example of how someone got banned for little more than expressing an unpopular opinion (probably with the wrong people present), this thread might be worth a look.

Christmas Ape

I skimmed the thread looking for red text, but I assume I missed a banning for disagreement with a popular opinion.

'cause that Zoran dude apparently felt that if he explained the benefits patronizingly enough the mods would let him piss all over their shoes. There's "disagreement" and there's "blaze of ego". I'm not gonna even pretend to be a fan of their moderation, and maybe the initial warning was shitty - I'm more than willing to believe it when those two get involved - but everything after that was antagonistic. It may be bad policy to ban for antagonism, but it's not unexpected that bad mods would do so when blatantly antagonized, ya know?
Heroism is no more than a chapter in a tale of submission.
"There is a general risk that those who flock together, on the Internet or elsewhere, will end up both confident and wrong [..]. They may even think of their fellow citizens as opponents or adversaries in some kind of 'war'." - Cass R. Sunstein
The internet recognizes only five forms of self-expression: bragging, talking shit, ass kissing, bullshitting, and moaning about how pathetic you are. Combine one with your favorite hobby and get out there!

jrients

Quote from: Elliot WilenSince someone was looking for an example of how someone got banned for little more than expressing an unpopular opinion (probably with the wrong people present), this thread might be worth a look.

Z.B.* is one weird cat.  Maybe his problem is similar in some way to Brian Gleichman's issues with internet communication.  I'm not saying the ban was justified, but at the same time I'm not surprised he quickly alienated folks.

*I'm not gonna type his name because I know he searches for his own name to join in conversations about himself.**  This happened on my blog a while back.

**I do that too, BTW.
Jeff Rients
My gameblog

James McMurray

Are you talking about the Zoran banning on the last page? It looks to me like he engaged in belittling a mod, was warned, and then banned when he didn't stop. Perhaps his intended tone when worrying if there were too many "big words" for others to comprehend wasn't meant to be denigrating, but that's when you should explain yourself instead of calling people liars, uncivil, and full of crap.

C'mon folks! Surely with a demon as evil as the RPG.net mods and so many claims of topics that get you banned somebody should be able to give me at least one to try on for size. :)

David R

It's pretty dodgy when the mods come into a thread, throw some snark at the about to be banned poster (not in red type off course) and a little later another mod comes along all in red type and bans said poster. And I could do without the so-called wit (from some mods) that comes with the banning.

Regards,
David R