This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Is history repeating itself with Paizo?

Started by Libertad, August 13, 2013, 09:39:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Bill

Quote from: jeff37923;685781They do, just ask Paizo. Hell, just ask a bunch of 3PP that have made a profit off of good modules like the Dungeon Crawl Classics line or Necromancer Games.

I personally have bought more modules than any other type of game book.

hamstertamer

Quote from: Mistwell;685739It's absolutely relevant.  For WOTC, adventurers/modules DIDN'T sell.  And so examining the way of that is highly relevant.


Um nope, you're still wrong.  There's no truth to the rumor that "modules/adventures don't sell."  Put out a high quality product and people will buy it, put a bad quality and people won't buy it.  You admitted this yourself already.
Gary Gygax - "It is suggested that you urge your players to provide painted figures representing their characters, henchmen, and hirelings involved in play."

Mistwell

Quote from: hamstertamer;685825Um nope, you're still wrong.  There's no truth to the rumor that "modules/adventures don't sell."  Put out a high quality product and people will buy it, put a bad quality and people won't buy it.  You admitted this yourself already.

Holy fuck are you being obtuse.  Except no, you intentionally cut the part of my post that made it clear that's not what I am talking about.  So, it's not you being obtuse, just a dick.

I'll repeat: If company X puts out 3 good modules in a row, and then 6 bad ones in a row, it seems that people stop buying modules from company X, even if the 10th module turns out to be good.  Because, at some point, people stop taking it on faith that it will be good, and they simply don't buy them anymore.  THAT is my point.

So yeah, modules/adventures don't sell well AFTER A COMPANY GETS A REPUTATION FOR MAKING BAD MODULES/ADVENTURES, even if they eventually do produce a good module/adventure again.