This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

The War Against Desborough and Mongoose Publishing

Started by jeff37923, June 23, 2012, 01:35:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

The Yann Waters

Quote from: Spike;555980Likewise, I've never seen a White Wolf thread removed, despite the Pundit's undying hatred for their creators.  Hell, I'm pretty sure Noblis is still an RPG section game... (countdown until Grimgent post in 5....4....)
Nobilis and the Wolf Wolf games may phrase their advice for the GM and players in narrative terms, but they're still "traditional" as far as the actual gameplay is concerned. I don't think there's ever been any real doubt on whether they count as RPGs or not: merely talking about "stories" instead of "scenarios" isn't quite enough for dismissal.
Previously known by the name of "GrimGent".

jeff37923

Quote from: Ghost Whistler;555993Arguing over inane self imposed private definitions seems to be complete intellectual masturbation.

Yet it seems to be exactly what you are doing.
"Meh."

Spike

Yer slacking, Grimgent. I posted about Noblis like...an hour ago, at least.
For you the day you found a minor error in a Post by Spike and forced him to admit it, it was the greatest day of your internet life.  For me it was... Tuesday.

For the curious: Apparently, in person, I sound exactly like the Youtube Character The Nostalgia Critic.   I have no words.

[URL=https:

Marleycat

Quote from: GrimGent;555996Nobilis and the Wolf Wolf games may phrase their advice for the GM and players in narrative terms, but they're still "traditional" as far as the actual gameplay is concerned. I don't think there's ever been any real doubt on whether they count as RPGs or not: merely talking about "stories" instead of "scenarios" isn't quite enough for dismissal.

I concur.
Don\'t mess with cats we kill wizards in one blow.;)

DKChannelBoredom

Quote from: Benoist;555986It's alright though. You can still talk about role playing games if you want to. Unless you're not interested in RPGs themselves, in which case, maybe you ought to register to story-games.com instead?

yeah yeah, no need to go all passive-aggressive. It's not a big thing for me and yes, I'm interested in rpg's and discussing them here, from Call over LotFP to Over the Edge and Ars Magica. Really. It's just the beaten dead horse of "this and that isn't an rpg, 'cause we said so" that bugs me. But as it has been thoroughly beaten, I'll leave it at that.
Running: Call of Cthulhu
Playing: Mainly boardgames
Quote from: Cranewings;410955Cocain is more popular than rp so there is bound to be some crossover.

The Traveller

Quote from: J Arcane;555994The storygamers have been given their chances, on site after site, and this was the result every fucking time.

The policy exists for that reason.  It has nothing to do with the Pundit's grudge, it has to do with the fact that even on this site, they were once allowed free reign of the main form, and they did exactly what I just fucking described, just like they do everywhere else.
This. They can't even keep it out of this unrelated thread. These folks ain't right.
"These children are playing with dark and dangerous powers!"
"What else are you meant to do with dark and dangerous powers?"
A concise overview of GNS theory.
Quote from: that muppet vince baker on RPGsIf you care about character arcs or any, any, any lit 101 stuff, I\'d choose a different game.

Spike

Quote from: Marleycat;555999I concur.

You obviously missed where I actually summoned a particular poster... like a wizard.

I swear to only use my power for evil.
For you the day you found a minor error in a Post by Spike and forced him to admit it, it was the greatest day of your internet life.  For me it was... Tuesday.

For the curious: Apparently, in person, I sound exactly like the Youtube Character The Nostalgia Critic.   I have no words.

[URL=https:

crkrueger

Quote from: DKChannelBoredom;556000"this and that isn't an rpg, 'cause we said so" that bugs me.
Good then you shouldn't have a problem with most of the games moved there as their mechanics clearly identify them as a different class of game. :D
Even the the "cutting edge" storygamers for all their talk of narrative, plot, and drama are fucking obsessed with the god damned rules they use. - Estar

Yes, Sean Connery\'s thumb does indeed do megadamage. - Spinachcat

Isuldur is a badass because he stopped Sauron with a broken sword, but Iluvatar is the badass because he stopped Sauron with a hobbit. -Malleus Arianorum

"Tangency Edition" D&D would have no classes or races, but 17 genders to choose from. -TristramEvans

One Horse Town

For what it's worth i think the 'no agendas' thing is nonsense as well. I also think it was a reaction to what this thread was originally about rather than a description of the site as a whole.

crkrueger

Well, no political or social agendas is closer to the mark.  This whole site is one big gaming agenda, really.
Even the the "cutting edge" storygamers for all their talk of narrative, plot, and drama are fucking obsessed with the god damned rules they use. - Estar

Yes, Sean Connery\'s thumb does indeed do megadamage. - Spinachcat

Isuldur is a badass because he stopped Sauron with a broken sword, but Iluvatar is the badass because he stopped Sauron with a hobbit. -Malleus Arianorum

"Tangency Edition" D&D would have no classes or races, but 17 genders to choose from. -TristramEvans

DKChannelBoredom

Quote from: CRKrueger;556006Good then you shouldn't have a problem with most of the games moved there as their mechanics clearly identify them as a different class of game. :D

Heh - true, and it's not that I don't think that there's games that belong there, story-games or whatever. But Dogs in the Vineyard fx, not only has it got characters, missions, a GM (called a GM!), character creation and the use of all the classic rpg dice, but it also has "A role-playing game" written on the cover. But hey - it's ok - I'm not a big fan of it.
Running: Call of Cthulhu
Playing: Mainly boardgames
Quote from: Cranewings;410955Cocain is more popular than rp so there is bound to be some crossover.

Benoist

Quote from: DKChannelBoredom;556009Heh - true, and it's not that I don't think that there's games that belong there, story-games or whatever. But Dogs in the Vineyard fx, not only has it got characters, missions, a GM (called a GM!), character creation and the use of all the classic rpg dice, but it also has "A role-playing game" written on the cover. But hey - it's ok - I'm not a big fan of it.

OD&D used inches for movement, dice and the like, even had a default hex map for its wilderness, talked about "campaigns" (called campaigns!), had a referee (called a referee!) and talked about men-at-arms and objectives, and had "Rules for fantastic medieval wargames; campaigns playable with paper and pencil and miniatures figures" on its cover! Obviously a wargame.

DKChannelBoredom

Quote from: Benoist;556010OD&D used inches for movement, dice and the like, even had a default hex map for its wilderness, talked about "campaigns" (called campaigns!), had a referee (called a referee!) and talked about men-at-arms and objectives, and had "Rules for fantastic medieval wargames; campaigns playable with paper and pencil and miniatures figures" on its cover! Obviously a wargame.

If you say so, I'm not a very old wargamer.
Running: Call of Cthulhu
Playing: Mainly boardgames
Quote from: Cranewings;410955Cocain is more popular than rp so there is bound to be some crossover.

jeff37923

Quote from: DKChannelBoredom;556012If you say so, I'm not a very old wargamer.

But this is a very old arguement.
"Meh."

jhkim

Quote from: Benoist;555986If the fact that a storygame ought to be talked about in the Other Games section of the site stops you from talking about it at all, then maybe you aren't that interested in talking about the game in the first place?

It's alright though. You can still talk about role playing games if you want to. Unless you're not interested in RPGs themselves, in which case, maybe you ought to register to story-games.com instead?
I'm registered on both story-games.com and here.  I play a fairly wide range of RPGs.  I comment sometimes in the Other Games section here, but being shunted off to a lower-traffic side forum does discourage discussion.  I don't check the Other Games forum that often, and story games discussions there don't go very far.  

It's pretty obvious to me that shunting certain games off into a side forum discourages discussion.  Pundit commented about this a while ago when RPGnet folded out D&D and Fantasy D20 into a separate forum, calling it an anti-D&D move.