This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

How to Fix Gurps

Started by KrakaJak, July 10, 2011, 07:23:41 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

1989

Quote from: FrankTrollman;467542It's 2011, and if you're still on the roll-under wagon that is fucking pathetic.

-Frank

You're pathetic.

RPGPundit

I don't think roll under has any particular inferiority to roll over, except for possibly a psychological element.

RPGPundit
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you\'ve played \'medieval fantasy\' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

The Butcher

Quote from: 1989;532859You're pathetic.

Wow, that's old. ;)

Frank's a smart guy, but he gets way caught up in minutiae which, IME, aren't always relevant to people's actual enjoyment of the game.

I stand by my previous assesment, BTW:

Quote from: The Butcher;467548I agree that adding comes easier to most people, than subtracting. I just think you're overblowing the relevance of this, in typical theRPGsite style.

Straight-up roll-under is just as easy as roll-over. The trick is applying modifiers to the target number, before rolling, rather than to the roll's results.

Claudius

Quote from: The Butcher;533164Frank's a smart guy, but he gets way caught up in minutiae which, IME, aren't always relevant to people's actual enjoyment of the game.
Is he? After all he has said in this very thread about roll-over and roll-under, well, I don't want to call names, but frankly... :confused: . I may not be a genius, and haven't studied maths for a long time, and yet, I know that roll-under and roll-over are mathematically THE SAME FUCKING THING. It's like saying that 6+3 is better than 3+6. :confused:
Grając zaś w grę komputerową, być może zdarzyło się wam zapragnąć zejść z wyznaczonej przez autorów ścieżki i, miast zabić smoka i ożenić się z księżniczką, zabić księżniczkę i ożenić się ze smokiem.

Nihil sine magno labore vita dedit mortalibus.

And by your sword shall you live and serve thy brother, and it shall come to pass when you have dominion, you will break Jacob's yoke from your neck.

Dios, que buen vasallo, si tuviese buen señor!

Imperator

Quote from: Claudius;533186Is he? After all he has said in this very thread about roll-over and roll-under, well, I don't want to call names, but frankly... :confused: . I may not be a genius, and haven't studied maths for a long time, and yet, I know that roll-under and roll-over are mathematically THE SAME FUCKING THING. It's like saying that 6+3 is better than 3+6. :confused:

But they are not exactly the same from the point of view of cognitive operations.

Particularly, I have used and keep using Frank's suggestions about making Cthulhu a roll-over system and it's been a complete success.
My name is Ramón Nogueras. Running now Vampire: the Masquerade (Giovanni Chronicles IV for just 3 players), and itching to resume my Call of Cthulhu campaign (The Sense of the Sleight-of-Hand Man).

Claudius

Quote from: Imperator;533192But they are not exactly the same from the point of view of cognitive operations.
Please elaborate.

QuoteParticularly, I have used and keep using Frank's suggestions about making Cthulhu a roll-over system and it's been a complete success.
I'm not surprised, as I said mathematically there is no difference.
Grając zaś w grę komputerową, być może zdarzyło się wam zapragnąć zejść z wyznaczonej przez autorów ścieżki i, miast zabić smoka i ożenić się z księżniczką, zabić księżniczkę i ożenić się ze smokiem.

Nihil sine magno labore vita dedit mortalibus.

And by your sword shall you live and serve thy brother, and it shall come to pass when you have dominion, you will break Jacob's yoke from your neck.

Dios, que buen vasallo, si tuviese buen señor!

Rincewind1

Roll - over is just a serious game. Roll - under is for children.
Furthermore, I consider that  This is Why We Don\'t Like You thread should be closed

The Butcher

Quote from: Imperator;533192But they are not exactly the same from the point of view of cognitive operations.

Particularly, I have used and keep using Frank's suggestions about making Cthulhu a roll-over system and it's been a complete success.

I get that, man, and more power to you. I just don't buy into the anti-roll-under crusade, and the "objectively better" line of argument. It makes Frank look like an idiot savant of RPG rules-tinkering.

Géza Echs

Quote from: Rincewind1;533222Roll - over is just a serious game. Roll - under is for children.

Honestly, no offence meant, but this has to be the most nonsensical argument I've heard yet since joining this board.

misterguignol

Quote from: Géza Echs;533238Honestly, no offence meant, but this has to be the most nonsensical argument I've heard yet since joining this board.

I'm pretty sure Rince was kidding.  He's a WFRP fan, after all.

Rincewind1

Quote from: misterguignol;533242I'm pretty sure Rince was kidding.  He's a WFRP fan, after all.

And I even used a cursive this time, in hope that a ":rolleyes:" would be unnecessary at the end of that post.
Furthermore, I consider that  This is Why We Don\'t Like You thread should be closed

Géza Echs

Quote from: misterguignol;533242I'm pretty sure Rince was kidding.  He's a WFRP fan, after all.

I sure hope he was kidding! Still, my comment stands for the rest of the "argument" on roll-under versus roll-over throughout the thread.

Rincewind1

Quote from: Géza Echs;533245I sure hope he was kidding! Still, my comment stands for the rest of the "argument" on roll-under versus roll-over throughout the thread.

Preference of mechanic, is, generally speaking, a purely subjective matter of opinion. And opinions are like assholes - everybody has one. Claiming "objective superiority" is ridiculous and both logically and in fact, philosophically flawed on so many levels, that it makes me wonder sometimes how people manage to get their shoelaces tied.

Then again, apparently some do have a problem with them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBBwKWSxoMI
Furthermore, I consider that  This is Why We Don\'t Like You thread should be closed

J Arcane

Hulks and Horrors is roll-under and proud of it.
Bedroom Wall Press - Games that make you feel like a kid again.

Arcana Rising - An Urban Fantasy Roleplaying Game, powered by Hulks and Horrors.
Hulks and Horrors - A Sci-Fi Roleplaying game of Exploration and Dungeon Adventure
Heaven\'s Shadow - A Roleplaying Game of Faith and Assassination

Géza Echs

Quote from: Rincewind1;533246Preference of mechanic, is, generally speaking, a purely subjective matter of opinion. And opinions are like assholes - everybody has one. Claiming "objective superiority" is ridiculous and both logically and in fact, philosophically flawed on so many levels, that it makes me wonder sometimes how people manage to get their shoelaces tied.

I have no problem if somebody were to argue that a particular mechanic were their personal favourite - that's cool. But claiming that one is objectively better than the other is flat-out dumb. Particularly, as someone pointed out upthread, that the difference is that of 3+6 versus 6+3.

QuoteThen again, apparently some do have a problem with them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBBwKWSxoMI

Rolfe's just being a comedian, though, which is cool. Love his work, for the most part.