This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

pendragon - which edition?

Started by beeber, October 22, 2007, 06:09:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

beeber

all i'm really interested in are the seasonal rules i've heard so much about.  the whole arthurian thing doesn't do it for me.  

so, in that regard, which edition is best?  any particular one to specifically avoid?

Balbinus

5th, it's cleanest and best laid out.

I use 5th and have 4th in pdf form as it has the magic rules and tons more setting and chargen optional stuff, none of which sounds like it would interest you anyway.

Warthur

5th is beautiful, shiny, well-laid out, and has the Great Pendragon Campaign supplement (previously editions only had The Boy King, a tiny fraction of what the GPdC was meant to be - it's Stafford's glorious magnum opus and a must-have). That's all the Pendragon anybody could possibly want, although the magic rules and rules for characters from alternate cultures in 4th may be handy to have in PDF form.
I am no longer posting here or reading this forum because Pundit has regularly claimed credit for keeping this community active. I am sick of his bullshit for reasons I explain here and I don\'t want to contribute to anything he considers to be a personal success on his part.

I recommend The RPG Pub as a friendly place where RPGs can be discussed and where the guiding principles of moderation are "be kind to each other" and "no politics". It\'s pretty chill so far.

Ian Absentia

Balbinus and Warthur already gave my answer.  In many ways I still enjoy my old copy of 1st edition best, but the 5th edition captures just about everything I love from it.  The 5th is also very complete, very polished, and clearly laid out.

Spring for the .PDF of the 4th edition for alternate starting homelands (and detailed magic, if you must).

It's truly a fabulous game.

!i!

RPGPundit

The newest edition, without a doubt.
Along with the Great Pendragon Campaign; easily the best book of 2007.

RPGPundit
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you\'ve played \'medieval fantasy\' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

beeber

i thought that's what folks had said (use the 5th ed) in some earlier thread.  if the pdf of 4th is cheap i may get that too.  it's all brp-derivative, right?  so i can adapt it to my weirdo fantasy-prehistory-europe thing i'm trying to get going.  system is going to start with MRQ slaine and then sprinkle in others to taste.  available spices include possible earlier RQ versions, BRP/CoC, and a brief translation of 'drakar och demoner'.

Ian Absentia

It is, indeed, largely compatible with BRP games.  Here's an example of how David Dunham adapted the emotional trait rules to RuneQuest -- PenDragon Pass.  Nifty stuff.

!i!

[Edit: Upon reading the site after a good, long time, I realise that it was basically adapting RQ magic to Pendragon.]

droog

Quote from: Ian Absentia[Edit: Upon reading the site after a good, long time, I realise that it was basically adapting RQ magic to Pendragon.]
Yes, indeed. I ran a twenty-session game of that, with 8-12 guys playing. You could smell the testosterone from a block away. The male rivalry killed it in the end.
The past lives on in your front room
The poor still weak the rich still rule
History lives in the books at home
The books at home

Gang of Four
[/size]

Ian Absentia

Was that a good thing, or a bad thing, though?  Well, obviously not the killing off the game part.

!i!

droog

Well, it was just a thing, really.
The past lives on in your front room
The poor still weak the rich still rule
History lives in the books at home
The books at home

Gang of Four
[/size]

Ian Absentia

Ah.  A gentleman never asks and a lady never tells.  Gotcha.

!i!

droog

The past lives on in your front room
The poor still weak the rich still rule
History lives in the books at home
The books at home

Gang of Four
[/size]

Ian Absentia

The manly testosterone thingie.  I believe I'm reading too much into this. :deflated:

Anyway, yes, Pendragon and other BRP games can cross-pollinate quite handily if the mood strikes.

!i!

SunBoy

I'll add a vote. 5th is great. Passion botches are great. Hehe.
"Real randomness, I\'ve discovered, is the result of two or more role-players interacting"

Erick Wujcik, 2007

flyingmice

5th is excellent. WW did a superb job with it.

-clash
clash bowley * Flying Mice Games - an Imprint of Better Mousetrap Games
Flying Mice home page: http://jalan.flyingmice.com/flyingmice.html
Currently Designing: StarCluster 4 - Wavefront Empire
Last Releases: SC4 - Dark Orbital, SC4 - Out of the Ruins,  SC4 - Sabre & World
Blog: I FLY BY NIGHT