This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Pathfinder 2e - or Will pundit be proven right?

Started by Jaeger, January 21, 2019, 04:07:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

RPGPundit

Paizo will eventually be remembered as basically an opportunistic parasite on a weakened hobby.
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you\'ve played \'medieval fantasy\' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

Rhedyn

Quote from: RPGPundit;1080373Paizo will eventually be remembered as basically an opportunistic parasite on a weakened hobby.

That's a funny way of saying "the only reason D&D 4e wasn't the dominant game".

A lot had to go wrong for 4e to fail, Paizo making Pathfinder was an essential element.

Some argument could be made that OSR would have been bigger if 4e was the only other option for 3e players who like new books, but it can also be said that OSR really benefited from Paizo's dominance as "real D&D" so that OSR could fill the niche of "playable real D&D".

Because 4e wasn't actually bad and it's pretty easy to learn and play. I suspect most of the 3e diehards would have converted over eventually without something like Pathfinder. And then you do not get a 5e D&D that looks like this.

Christopher Brady

Quote from: RPGPundit;1080373Paizo will eventually be remembered as basically an opportunistic parasite on a weakened hobby.

So you hope.  But evidence suggests otherwise.  But I don't disagree with your premise that PFRPG2 will not be as 'good' or as popular as the first edition.
"And now, my friends, a Dragon\'s toast!  To life\'s little blessings:  wars, plagues and all forms of evil.  Their presence keeps us alert --- and their absence makes us grateful." -T.A. Barron[/SIZE]

S'mon

Quote from: Christopher Brady;1080425So you hope.  But evidence suggests otherwise.  But I don't disagree with your premise that PFRPG2 will not be as 'good' or as popular as the first edition.

What evidence?

Christopher Brady

Quote from: S'mon;1080433What evidence?

The fact that their storefront is still going strong?
"And now, my friends, a Dragon\'s toast!  To life\'s little blessings:  wars, plagues and all forms of evil.  Their presence keeps us alert --- and their absence makes us grateful." -T.A. Barron[/SIZE]

S'mon

Quote from: Christopher Brady;1080449The fact that their storefront is still going strong?

So their retail business is not an 'opportunistic parasite on a weakened hobby'?  I agree, but I'm sure Pundit was referring specifically to their Pathfinder RPG.

Daztur

Quote from: Rhedyn;1080375That's a funny way of saying "the only reason D&D 4e wasn't the dominant game".

A lot had to go wrong for 4e to fail, Paizo making Pathfinder was an essential element.

Some argument could be made that OSR would have been bigger if 4e was the only other option for 3e players who like new books, but it can also be said that OSR really benefited from Paizo's dominance as "real D&D" so that OSR could fill the niche of "playable real D&D".

Because 4e wasn't actually bad and it's pretty easy to learn and play. I suspect most of the 3e diehards would have converted over eventually without something like Pathfinder. And then you do not get a 5e D&D that looks like this.

Well there would've been something like Pathfinder. There was a pretty obvious market for 3.75ed that wasn't beeing filled so SOMEONE would've filled PF's shoes. Maybe the PF substitute wouldn't have been as popular or the market would be fragmented into a bunch of 3ed clones kind of like the OSR but 3ed clones were inevitable.

Christopher Brady

Quote from: S'mon;1080454So their retail business is not an 'opportunistic parasite on a weakened hobby'?  I agree, but I'm sure Pundit was referring specifically to their Pathfinder RPG.

He said Paizo, I assumed he believes that the company would burn if PFRPG fails.

He is incorrect.  Paizo have good business sense.  After all, while PFRPG was their baby, they STILL sold 4e stuff JUST IN CASE the bottom dropped out of their RPG business.  Personally, 2e is not gonna fly, it's clear that Paizo has no idea how to make RPGs, but them even taking a financial hit on this?  No.
"And now, my friends, a Dragon\'s toast!  To life\'s little blessings:  wars, plagues and all forms of evil.  Their presence keeps us alert --- and their absence makes us grateful." -T.A. Barron[/SIZE]

kythri

Quote from: Christopher Brady;1080478He said Paizo, I assumed he believes that the company would burn if PFRPG fails.

He is incorrect.  Paizo have good business sense.  After all, while PFRPG was their baby, they STILL sold 4e stuff JUST IN CASE the bottom dropped out of their RPG business.  Personally, 2e is not gonna fly, it's clear that Paizo has no idea how to make RPGs, but them even taking a financial hit on this?  No.

You're kidding, right?

Paizo's marketplace of 3rd-party products isn't anywhere near the income that their sales of their Pathfinder products are.

Haffrung

Unlikely PF2 will be as popular as PF1. But I'm pretty confident it will still be the second most popular fantasy RPG in the hobby. There's space in the market for a more crunchy D&D variant, and PF2 will certainly be more accessible for new players than the frankenstein system of PF1. The pissing and moaning about it on forums is the usual grognard response to any new edition.
 

Christopher Brady

Quote from: kythri;1080480You're kidding, right?

Paizo's marketplace of 3rd-party products isn't anywhere near the income that their sales of their Pathfinder products are.

Citation needed.
"And now, my friends, a Dragon\'s toast!  To life\'s little blessings:  wars, plagues and all forms of evil.  Their presence keeps us alert --- and their absence makes us grateful." -T.A. Barron[/SIZE]

kythri

Quote from: Christopher Brady;1080546Citation needed.

Nah, not this time.  Anyone who has paid attention to anything Paizo has said since the Dragon/Dungeon transition is aware of this.

The Adventure Path was, and now the RPG is, their bread and butter.

I'm not saying they make an inconsequential amount of money from the webstore, but the majority of that is from subscribers to their various PF products who use it for convenience.

The only reason Paizo's PDF marketplace is a viable market for 3rd-parties is because it's the only place to legally acquire Paizo's PF content.  That's specifically what it was created for, and they opened it up later to 3rd-party products.  If it had to compete with DTRPG on it's own merits, and not be the exclusive source for the Paizo content, it wouldn't survive.

If Paizo stops publishing, their webstore really won't be something that keeps them afloat.

Shasarak

Quote from: RPGPundit;1080373Paizo will eventually be remembered as basically an opportunistic parasite on a weakened hobby.

Gawd they saved us from Cthulhu, what do you want a gold plated PHB?
Who da Drow?  U da drow! - hedgehobbit

There will be poor always,
pathetically struggling,
look at the good things you've got! -  Jesus

James Gillen

If they'd made this a bit more like Starfinder (with the fixed hit points and building-block steps of character generation) combined with some of the 4E/5E concepts (like proficiency bonus independent of class and bounded accuracy) they could have gotten somewhere.  As it is you have all the crunch of PF/3.5 (that turns some people off) without the straightforward system that makes the crunch work.

JG
-My own opinion is enough for me, and I claim the right to have it defended against any consensus, any majority, anywhere, any place, any time. And anyone who disagrees with this can pick a number, get in line and kiss my ass.
 -Christopher Hitchens
-Be very very careful with any argument that calls for hurting specific people right now in order to theoretically help abstract people later.
-Daztur

Omega

Quote from: RPGPundit;1080373Paizo will eventually be remembered as basically an opportunistic parasite on a weakened hobby.

The whole of the OSR may end up remembered as that too. Parasites.