This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Do you prefer Appearance or Charisma stats? Or both?

Started by Trond, May 28, 2018, 05:20:13 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Steven Mitchell

You need charisma to get and hold peoples' attention.  What you do with that attention then decides whether that is an example of leadership or something else.

Eric Diaz

Quote from: AsenRG;1044664That I agree with.
The question with Charisma is how to handle the edge cases that want the other Charisma-based stuff, but not the leadership. And to me, it's not a theoretical question.

Presumably, make leadership a skill, or based on level, etc, instead of charisma. In old school D&D you gained followers if you're level 9 despite you charisma, but OTOH charisma affected hirelings (or something like that).
Chaos Factory Books  - Dark fantasy RPGs and more!

Methods & Madness - my  D&D 5e / Old School / Game design blog.

Eric Diaz

To me Appearance is a SECONDARY stat at best, and I like to see it based on Con as well as Cha. But, realistically, I do't care about the PCs or NPCs looking pretty most of the times.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]2559[/ATTACH]
Chaos Factory Books  - Dark fantasy RPGs and more!

Methods & Madness - my  D&D 5e / Old School / Game design blog.

Christopher Brady

Quote from: Eric Diaz;1044884To me Appearance is a SECONDARY stat at best, and I like to see it based on Con as well as Cha. But, realistically, I do't care about the PCs or NPCs looking pretty most of the times.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]2559[/ATTACH]

I would have to disagree.  For men it's Strength and Charisma, because no matter what women claim, they like a nice sculpted body (on average.)
"And now, my friends, a Dragon\'s toast!  To life\'s little blessings:  wars, plagues and all forms of evil.  Their presence keeps us alert --- and their absence makes us grateful." -T.A. Barron[/SIZE]

Mike the Mage

Perhaps, but if you think that good Con makes you age slower, have better teeth, smell nice and have an air of generall virility, I would go with Con.
When change threatens to rule, then the rules are changed

crkrueger

Quote from: Christopher Brady;1044946I would have to disagree.  For men it's Strength and Charisma, because no matter what women claim, they like a nice sculpted body (on average.)

But sculpted isn't necessarily big.  Bruce Lee and The Rock are both sculpted, but one is much stronger.  Someone who has an excellent Con I consider to be in good shape, ie. Healthy.  Sure, some women prefer lean athletes, some women prefer big muscles, but the key shared by both is Health.  That's why I think Con is a much better contender for the "Glamour" alluded to above.
Even the the "cutting edge" storygamers for all their talk of narrative, plot, and drama are fucking obsessed with the god damned rules they use. - Estar

Yes, Sean Connery\'s thumb does indeed do megadamage. - Spinachcat

Isuldur is a badass because he stopped Sauron with a broken sword, but Iluvatar is the badass because he stopped Sauron with a hobbit. -Malleus Arianorum

"Tangency Edition" D&D would have no classes or races, but 17 genders to choose from. -TristramEvans

AsenRG

Quote from: Eric Diaz;1044884To me Appearance is a SECONDARY stat at best, and I like to see it based on Con as well as Cha. But, realistically, I do't care about the PCs or NPCs looking pretty most of the times.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]2559[/ATTACH]

Quote from: Eric Diaz;1044884To me Appearance is a SECONDARY stat at best, and I like to see it based on Con as well as Cha. But, realistically, I do't care about the PCs or NPCs looking pretty most of the times.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]2559[/ATTACH]
That really fails to explain the success of the "dark, brooding, sickly poet" type;).
What Do You Do In Tekumel? See examples!
"Life is not fair. If the campaign setting is somewhat like life then the setting also is sometimes not fair." - Bren

Mike the Mage

That success is well overrated. Invented by Goths and hypochondriacs. (-tautology?)
When change threatens to rule, then the rules are changed

AsenRG

Quote from: Mike the Mage;1045009That success is well overrated. Invented by Goths and hypochondriacs. (-tautology?)

I know a few guys who definitely wouldn't agree with you, and have the experience to back it up;)!
What Do You Do In Tekumel? See examples!
"Life is not fair. If the campaign setting is somewhat like life then the setting also is sometimes not fair." - Bren

Mike the Mage

When change threatens to rule, then the rules are changed

Trond

#55
Quote from: RPGPundit;1043864Charisma IS leadership.

This is exactly why I sometimes think more stats work better. As I mentioned, having just a "charisma" stat can't tell the difference between Hitler and Salma Hayek. :D

Trond

Quote from: Christopher Brady;1044946I would have to disagree.  For men it's Strength and Charisma, because no matter what women claim, they like a nice sculpted body (on average.)

Women looking at men actually also tend to put a lot of emphasis on a vague thing you can describe as "resourcefulness" or "resources", probably more so than overall looks. That's why men often like to impress women with their new fancy car (and it actually works a bit better than women tend to admit), while you will rarely see women trying to woo a man with the same type of thing.

Christopher Brady

Quote from: Mike the Mage;1044952Perhaps, but if you think that good Con makes you age slower, have better teeth, smell nice and have an air of generall virility, I would go with Con.

I guess part of the issue is that Strength and Constitution are pretty interlinked and are inseparable in terms of actual biology.  If you don't have good health, you can't really use or gain strength.
"And now, my friends, a Dragon\'s toast!  To life\'s little blessings:  wars, plagues and all forms of evil.  Their presence keeps us alert --- and their absence makes us grateful." -T.A. Barron[/SIZE]

AsenRG

Quote from: Mike the Mage;1045014Fake sickly, I betcha!:rolleyes::D

Only some of them, the others were legit:D!
What Do You Do In Tekumel? See examples!
"Life is not fair. If the campaign setting is somewhat like life then the setting also is sometimes not fair." - Bren

RPGPundit

LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you\'ve played \'medieval fantasy\' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.