SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

"Generic" Dungeon Question

Started by Werekoala, March 06, 2007, 05:49:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Werekoala

Could you design and publish a dungeon or adventure to be generic or multi-system and have the creatures for each encounter be referenced by a series of book/page number from other products? i.e. not stats or a stat block for any one system, just a listing like "Monster Manual 2, page 25; GURPS Bestiary, page 6" etc? What kind of legal requirements might their be? If you're not using any actual work from another product, just referencing it, would that be a viable way to go?
Lan Astaslem


"It's rpg.net The population there would call the Second Coming of Jesus Christ a hate crime." - thedungeondelver

James McMurray

That should be ok, as long as you provide proper trademark and/or copyright info for the books you cite. I'd probably call each company up and ask them if they mind. I don't know if legally you need permission, but it seems like the polite thing to do. Not to mention if you happen to piss the wrong company off, it doesn't have to be illegal for court costs to eat you alive.

One Horse Town

As far as i know, referencing other works shouldn't be a problem. It's a common thing after all to list references in books that have served as inspiration. However, using the distinct names present in some systems, such as Gelatinous Cube or Otilukes Freezing Sphere, from d&d in a published work and then giving a product reference, may be problematic.

If you really wish to publish a systemless resource, i personally think that you'd be better off by describing things such as beasts, spell effects etc in generic terms. This leaves it up to the reader to convert the descriptions to the system that they are using and also relieves you of any worries about legal responsibility.

James J Skach

Or pick one to three systems that are fairly well known to have conversion to and from, and provide stats accordingly.  That way, people could convert using existing information based on the system information you provide.

perhaps...
The rules are my slave, not my master. - Old Geezer

The RPG Haven - Talking About RPGs

Mcrow

I can't imagine an RPG company that would have a problem with that if you asked first.

HinterWelt

Quote from: WerekoalaCould you design and publish a dungeon or adventure to be generic or multi-system and have the creatures for each encounter be referenced by a series of book/page number from other products? i.e. not stats or a stat block for any one system, just a listing like "Monster Manual 2, page 25; GURPS Bestiary, page 6" etc? What kind of legal requirements might their be? If you're not using any actual work from another product, just referencing it, would that be a viable way to go?
The item you would run afoul of most often would be trademarks. If Mosnter Manual is a TM of WOTC then you cannot use it. Most game titles are so you need to have express permission of the holder to use it.

Also, you woul dnot be able to say "Comapatible with the Monster Manual!" in your ad copy since you would be using their TM.

Those are the big ones I can think of. I do not believe it would fall under a Fair Use clause.

Bill

Edit: Addendum: The key to remember also, is that they need to defend it. So, if you use it, you might get away with it but you open yourself up for litigation.
The RPG Haven - Talking about RPGs
My Site
Oh...the HinterBlog
Lord Protector of the Cult of Clash was Right
When you look around you have to wonder,
Do you play to win or are you just a bad loser?

Werekoala

Thanks for all the tips so far. Do you think the Trademark issue could be skirted by saying "MM" rather than Monster Manual?
Lan Astaslem


"It's rpg.net The population there would call the Second Coming of Jesus Christ a hate crime." - thedungeondelver

Calithena

I think I remember from my d20 days that the abbreviations were more frowned on than the book titles. I'm pretty sure "DMG" was forbidden frex.

But, I thought we were allowed to refer to the books somehow - maybe the full titles were OK? Hmm.
Looking for your old-school fantasy roleplaying fix? Don't despair...Fight On!