This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Looking for alpha playtesters for Easy20, my "Design a RPG in a thread" RPG

Started by Narf the Mouse, March 01, 2010, 10:41:18 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Narf the Mouse

As long as I get feedback, you'll get your name in the credits and a .pdf copy of the final game, when it's finished.

Easy20 takes the best of each edition, adds in some ingrediants of my own design and makes a tasty stew of them. It is intended to be simple to learn, interesting to play and have meaningful actions possible at all levels and styles of play.

Look for the addition of the Sorcery sub-System, coming soon.

Must be willing to work with rules that are in flux and additions, give meaningful feedback and test the rules till they break.

PM me or post here and I will send you a copy of the current rules, plus an update every two or three days.

"Dry" (Play-less) testing is accepted, so long as you make it clear that is what you are going to do.
The main problem with government is the difficulty of pressing charges against its directors.

Given a choice of two out of three M&Ms, the human brain subconsciously tries to justify the two M&Ms chosen as being superior to the M&M not chosen.

Silverlion

Heh, wonder if it will look like my Path's of Glory Game? (My "Free 20" project that evolved into its own thing.)

I wish I could playtest, best I could is comment, as I've got much of my own testing to do as well as another promised playtest to try out. Maybe in a few months?
High Valor REVISED: A fantasy Dark Age RPG. Available NOW!
Hearts & Souls 2E Coming in 2019

Narf the Mouse

Thanks for the thought. I'll see where it is in a few months. :)
The main problem with government is the difficulty of pressing charges against its directors.

Given a choice of two out of three M&Ms, the human brain subconsciously tries to justify the two M&Ms chosen as being superior to the M&M not chosen.

winkingbishop

I'd be happy to volunteer, but you have to let me know if this will work: I live a couple of hours from my primary gaming group.  We're starting a 3.5 D&D game virtually quite soon.  However, I periodically visit with them and we use that time for "pick-up" sessions of RC D&D, Descent, that sort of thing.  If your game can be played and enjoyed in an episodic way, I'd bring it to the table.  Also, my campus has a pretty good sized gaming club.  They host "mini-cons" every now and then.
"I presume, my boy, you are the keeper of this oracular pig." -The Horned King

Friar Othos - [Ptolus/AD&D pbp]

Narf the Mouse

That will certainly work - I'll PM you the rules tonight, after the latest update.

In the meantime, the design thread can give you an idea of the current direction of the rules.
The main problem with government is the difficulty of pressing charges against its directors.

Given a choice of two out of three M&Ms, the human brain subconsciously tries to justify the two M&Ms chosen as being superior to the M&M not chosen.

Narf the Mouse

Update: As there is no way to attach something to a PM, I'll need volunteers to PM one of their e-mail addresses. A temporary address is fine, so long as you tell me before you stop playtesting.
The main problem with government is the difficulty of pressing charges against its directors.

Given a choice of two out of three M&Ms, the human brain subconsciously tries to justify the two M&Ms chosen as being superior to the M&M not chosen.