This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Cleric vs Level Drain

Started by Baron Opal, July 03, 2015, 03:08:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Baron Opal

What do you think of a cleric that cannot turn undead, but is immune to level drain? This would include ghoul paralysis, shadow strength drain, &c.

It wouldn't be a blanket immunity, the character would have to make a save (Death) or perhaps succeed in an appropriate turning check. If the check succeeds, the energies are repulsed, and the undead touch just does its basic damage.

rawma

I think that cleric's going to take point in any crypts or graveyards.

Generally, I like it that characters are good in different situations, as it creates some natural role-playing where each character wants to do stuff that they're good at. This character is potentially annoying because what they're good at only benefits them. A cleric who can only do self-healing would be very similar. If they're not ready to step up and be the tank (diverting attacks from other characters because they can handle them better), then I don't like it.

Baron Opal

That's a good point. How about they can shield X number of characters from level drain, dependent on turning check? It couldn't last that long, a turn per use let's say.