This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Another Survey. Can You Help Me?

Started by Bobpool, June 20, 2013, 12:15:02 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Bobpool

Based on the results of my last survey.  I wanted to drill down a little further.

It sounds like people are really struggling with finding players, complicated rules, and extremely long combats.  Am I right here?

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/7ZQ9PMD

Thanks!

Amalgam

Point 5 was hard to answer. I enjoy fights, but i want them to be meaningful.

Point 6 was also a little hard, as i'm currently working on my own homebrew system, and i haven't tested it very widespread yet, but my gaming group has been using AD&D, so i'm not sure which one to answer with. So answered that one twice. I consider AD&D to be a somewhat hard character creation, and my own to be somewhat easy.

Question 8 applies to our group in both ways. Right now our group is on hiatus due to vacations and things, but when we do get together there's usually 2-3 players looking at cat pictures on their phones while another player will occasionally go on for almost 15 minutes about random idiosyncrasies of his character and himself...

Not sure how you're defining source book, i'm assuming that isn't one of the core books? I think the rules to cover as many different issues as possible should occur within the core books, and the settings should be in the supplements/source books. If this is still going to be about trans-dimensional and time travel, trying to fit all your settings in one is going to be a migraine and a half, but unless you have a setting that breaks specific rules of physics that apply generally, rules that apply only to that single setting, you won't need additional rules in the sourcebooks.

That said, i answered classless and levelless because that's my current homebrew project, though i'm perfectly fine with class and level based gameplay. I think going with less definition allows for more creation flexibility and personalizing of one's own characters, rather than working from a template, though a template might be given to offer some suggestions and examples of how characters might look when completed.

LordVreeg

glad to help, but I did feel a few times that the exact answer was not available to me.
Currently running 1 live groups and two online group in my 30+ year old campaign setting.  
http://celtricia.pbworks.com/
Setting of the Year, 08 Campaign Builders Guild awards.
\'Orbis non sufficit\'

My current Collegium Arcana online game, a test for any ruleset.

RandallS

Quote from: Bobpool;664123It sounds like people are really struggling with finding players, complicated rules, and extremely long combats.  Am I right here?

I have no trouble finding players, don't run games with complex rules, and think a very long combat is one that runs more than 10-15 minutes. I would struggle to have any interest in a game with lots of complicated rules or long combats, however. :)

BTW, "other" does not work on your survey. The software requires you to select one of the standard options even if you fill out the "Other" blank. :(
Randall
Rules Light RPGs: Home of Microlite20 and Other Rules-Lite Tabletop RPGs

Brad J. Murray

Quote from: Bobpool;664123Based on the results of my last survey.  I wanted to drill down a little further.

It sounds like people are really struggling with finding players, complicated rules, and extremely long combats.  Am I right here?

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/7ZQ9PMD

Thanks!

There seems to be an underlying assumption buried in this: the (bizarre, to me) idea that I have one system I use. I can't answer most of those questions because sometimes I want eggs and sometimes I want waffles.

LordVreeg

Quote from: Brad J. Murray;664842There seems to be an underlying assumption buried in this: the (bizarre, to me) idea that I have one system I use. I can't answer most of those questions because sometimes I want eggs and sometimes I want waffles.

I always homebrew a system before starting a game.  So I actually have the same issues, only I always want to make them from scratch.
Currently running 1 live groups and two online group in my 30+ year old campaign setting.  
http://celtricia.pbworks.com/
Setting of the Year, 08 Campaign Builders Guild awards.
\'Orbis non sufficit\'

My current Collegium Arcana online game, a test for any ruleset.

Bobpool

Sorry guys.  I asked some of the questions based on some of the questions based on my last survey.  http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/7ZQ9PMD I'm thinking about starting a podcast and a blog before doing anything and was just trying to find what people are most interested in beforehand.

I know the people who answered here may have different experiences with many aspects such as how difficult is it to create a new character for your players.  On my previous survey, it seemed like the two areas people complained the greatest were character creation and combat.  Mostly being it was too complicated, so I thought I'd ask how people felt beyond what people wrote in open ended questions.

Ratman_tf

Quote from: LordVreeg;664775glad to help, but I did feel a few times that the exact answer was not available to me.

Yeah. I quit out because the questions and answers weren't relevant to my games.
The notion of an exclusionary and hostile RPG community is a fever dream of zealots who view all social dynamics through a narrow keyhole of structural oppression.
-Haffrung

LordVreeg

Quote from: Bobpool;665080Sorry guys.  I asked some of the questions based on some of the questions based on my last survey.  http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/7ZQ9PMD I'm thinking about starting a podcast and a blog before doing anything and was just trying to find what people are most interested in beforehand.

I know the people who answered here may have different experiences with many aspects such as how difficult is it to create a new character for your players.  On my previous survey, it seemed like the two areas people complained the greatest were character creation and combat.  Mostly being it was too complicated, so I thought I'd ask how people felt beyond what people wrote in open ended questions.

I prefer systems that have an easy default and advanced options.
Currently running 1 live groups and two online group in my 30+ year old campaign setting.  
http://celtricia.pbworks.com/
Setting of the Year, 08 Campaign Builders Guild awards.
\'Orbis non sufficit\'

My current Collegium Arcana online game, a test for any ruleset.

Opaopajr

The survey is too binary to be meaningful. Also the wording could be construed as push-polling. But I understand, survey creation is a wholly different skill that most of us haven't trained for.

Might I suggest more gradations: "from a 5 point range of most like to most hate", etc.
Just make your fuckin\' guy and roll the dice, you pricks. Focus on what\'s interesting, not what gives you the biggest randomly generated virtual penis.  -- J Arcane
 
You know, people keep comparing non-TSR D&D to deck-building in Magic: the Gathering. But maybe it\'s more like Katamari Damacy. You keep sticking shit on your characters until they are big enough to be a star.
-- talysman

flyingmice

Quote from: LordVreeg;664775glad to help, but I did feel a few times that the exact answer was not available to me.

I tried to make out a survey, but this same thing hit me, so I dropped out. Sometimes it was a "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" feeling. I'm not going to give you a wrong answer.

-clash
clash bowley * Flying Mice Games - an Imprint of Better Mousetrap Games
Flying Mice home page: http://jalan.flyingmice.com/flyingmice.html
Currently Designing: StarCluster 4 - Wavefront Empire
Last Releases: SC4 - Dark Orbital, SC4 - Out of the Ruins,  SC4 - Sabre & World
Blog: I FLY BY NIGHT

Zachary The First

Quote from: Opaopajr;665277The survey is too binary to be meaningful. Also the wording could be construed as push-polling. But I understand, survey creation is a wholly different skill that most of us haven't trained for.

Might I suggest more gradations: "from a 5 point range of most like to most hate", etc.

I would second this. I answered, though, and did my best.
RPG Blog 2

Currently Prepping: Castles & Crusades
Currently Reading/Brainstorming: Mythras
Currently Revisiting: Napoleonic/Age of Sail in Space